Study Notes on Albert Beveridge's Defense of U.S. Imperialism

Albert Beveridge Defends U.S. Imperialism, 1900

Introduction

  • Source: Congressional Record (56th Congress, 1st Session, pages 704-712)

  • Context: Albert Beveridge's speech expressing the justification for U.S. imperialism, particularly the annexation and governance of the Philippines.

Key Themes

U.S. Sovereignty Over the Philippines
  • The Philippines are stated to be permanently part of the United States, referred to as "territory belonging to the United States" according to the Constitution.

  • Beveridge asserts that the U.S. will not retreat from its duty regarding the Philippines and emphasizes the importance of American responsibility in the region.

Economic Opportunities in Asia
  • China's Markets:

    • Beveridge highlights China as a market that is immensely valuable and notes that the Philippines position the U.S. as a neighbor to these markets.

    • Markets in China are depicted as "illimitable," providing a significant trade opportunity for the U.S.

  • Importance of the Pacific Ocean:

    • The Pacific is portrayed as the "ocean of the commerce of the future," critical for trade and commerce.

    • The strategic significance of the Philippines is emphasized as a base for American commercial and military power in Asia.

Strategic Military Positioning
  • The Philippines are described as a vital strategic position for naval and military operations in the eastern seas.

    • Beveridge refers to the islands as offering one of the three great ocean possessions of the globe.

    • This location allows the U.S. to convene closer to other significant territories such as India and China.

Racial and Cultural Justifications
  • Beveridge argues that the Filipino people are incapable of self-governance due to their perceived racial and cultural characteristics.

    • He implies that their experience under Spanish rule has ingrained a sense of incompetence regarding self-governance.

    • The speech invokes a hierarchy of races and suggests that only "Anglo-Saxon" people possess the capability for self-governance.

  • Comparison to Other Peoples:

    • He makes a derogatory analogy comparing the common people of the Philippines to "children playing at men’s work" and claims their work ethic is inadequate.

    • Describes the Filipinos as "incurably indolent" and lacking the industrious nature required for significant economic development.

Historical and Philosophical Dimensions
  • Divine Mission of America:

    • Beveridge claims that America has a divine purpose, positioning itself as a "trustee of the world’s progress" and a leader in civilizing efforts globally.

    • He cites providence as a force guiding people to lead the world towards civilization and order, suggesting that failing to take on the role would lead to chaos and barbarism.

Political Implications
  • Beveridge argues against the notion that historical documents like the Declaration of Independence apply to the governance of territories such as the Philippines.

    • He stresses that the founding documents were created by and for self-governing peoples and that the current circumstances differ significantly.

  • Proclamations of constitutional power to govern territories like the Philippines are compared to the governance of regions like Florida, Louisiana, and Alaska.

    • He questions whether geographical distance impacts constitutional authority and grounds his argument in a broader interpretation of American destiny.

Conclusion
  • Beveridge's speech concludes with a bold declaration of America's role as a chosen nation tasked with leading the world toward progress and civility.

    • He invokes a biblical reference about faithfulness and responsibility, framing America's imperial ambitions as a noble and profound duty that ultimately brings both profit and glory.

Citations

  • Fink, Leon, ed. "Major Problems in the Gilded Age and the Progressive Era." New York: Houghton Mifflin Co., 2001.