Limits Notes: Conjugates, Piecewise, and Infinity
Conjugate trick for square-root limits - Target limit (part a):
When you plug in , you get , which means we need to simplify the expression.
To simplify, multiply the top and bottom by the "conjugate" of the square-root part, which is :
Use the difference of squares rule () on the top part. Here, and , so .
This simplifies the expression to:
Now that the problem factor is gone, plug in again:
Key takeaway: If you have a square root expression (like ) in the numerator and direct substitution gives , multiply by its conjugate to help simplify and cancel out the problematic terms.
Target limit (part b):
If you plug in , you also get . So, we need to simplify.
First, combine the two fractions in the numerator into a single fraction. Find a common denominator, which is .
Now, substitute this back into the original expression:
The in the top and bottom cancels out (since in the limit approaching 0):
Finally, plug in to find the limit:
Important note: Be careful when you subtract expressions, especially when a minus sign is involved, like . Make sure the minus sign applies to all terms inside the parentheses.
Piecewise functions: one-sided limits at boundary points
A piecewise function changes its rule (formula) at certain points. We need to check limits at these "boundary points" to see what the function is approaching.
f(x) = \begin{cases}
x+1, & x \le 2, \
2x-1, & 2 4.
\end{cases}Here, the rules change at and .
Boundary at :
Left-hand limit: As approaches 2 from values less than 2 (e.g., 1.9, 1.99), use the rule :
Right-hand limit: As approaches 2 from values greater than 2 (e.g., 2.1, 2.01), use the rule :
Since both the left-hand and right-hand limits are the same (both are 3), the limit at exists:
Boundary at :
Left-hand limit: As approaches 4 from values less than 4 (e.g., 3.9, 3.99), use the rule :
Right-hand limit: As approaches 4 from values greater than 4 (e.g., 4.1, 4.01), use the rule :
Since the left-hand limit (7) and the right-hand limit (40) are not the same, the two-sided limit at does not exist:
Conceptual takeaway:
A limit for a function at a point only exists if the value it approaches from the left is the same as the value it approaches from the right.
When a function changes its definition (rule) at a point, you must check both the left-hand and right-hand limits separately to determine if the overall limit exists.
Quick follow-up example (using given limits of and without knowing their formulas):
Given that when approaches 4, approaches 16, and approaches 9:
a) The limit of a square root is the square root of the limit:
b) The limit of a sum/difference is the sum/difference of the limits, and constants can be pulled out:
Note: We don't need to know the actual formulas for and ; we only use the given values of their limits and standard limit rules.