Validation and Qualification in Analytical Laboratories-10-43.docx

1. Introduction

  • The purpose of chemical analytical measurement: to get consistent, reliable, and accurate data.

  • Incorrect measurement results can lead to:

    • Product recalls due to incorrectly measured specifications.

    • Negative health impacts from drugs with undetected impurities.

    • Danger from harmful contaminants in environmental or food samples.

  • Reporting incorrect results leads to loss of confidence in future laboratory results.

  • Importance of validation and qualification:

    • Ensures reliability and accuracy within a known confidence level.

    • Required in regulated or accredited environments despite not being directly specified in regulations like GLP/GMP or ISO 17025.

    • Direct impact on product quality and consumer safety, making analytical test results high-risk records.

  • Addressing validation issues:

    • FDA guides on analytical and bioanalytical method validation.

    • ICH guidelines for the validation of analytical procedures.

    • USP draft chapter on analytical instrument qualification.

    • ISPE good practices guide on the validation of laboratory systems.

    • EPA guidance on methods development and validation.

    • AOAC guidelines on method validation.

    • ISO guides on control charts and qualification of reference material.

    • EU Directive on Validation and Qualification.

  • Historical context of validation in analytical laboratories:

    • Validation has always been performed by good scientists prior to routine analysis.

  • Current challenges in validation and qualification:

    • Lack of documented procedures and results.

    • Partial validation of total analytical procedures.

    • Unqualified accessories and materials for equipment qualification.

    • Unknown operational qualification parameters.

    • Uncertainties in software and computer system validation procedures.

    • One-time validation and qualification, rather than ongoing processes.

    • Incorrect risk-based validation.

    • Confusion over criteria for existing system qualification.

  • The intention of this book:

    • Provide answers to these challenges with common sense recommendations and practical experience.

  • Description of book structure:

    • Covers practical aspects of validation and qualification, including regulations, quality standards, terminology, risk assessment, and qualifications of people.

    • Appendices include practical examples and procedures.

    • Focus on chromatography but applicable to other analytical techniques.

  • Importance of evaluating and documenting recommendations made in the book.

  • The necessity of considering compliance and business risk in validation.

  • Essential goal: generate valid, reliable analytical data.

  • The challenge: optimal validation effort without excessive validation burden.

  • Cost of validation increases exponentially from no validation to complete validation.