The Psychology of Clothing
ISSN and Publication Details
Print ISSN: 2623-6257
Online ISSN: 2623-6281
Journal Homepage: www.tlr-journal.com
DOI: 10.31881/TLR
Article Citation: Kodzoman D. The Psychology of Clothing: Meaning of Colors, Body Image and Gender Expression in Fashion. Textile & Leather Review. 2019; 2(2):90-103.
Published on: 6 June 2019
License: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Abstract
Purpose of Clothing: Clothing choices reflect the meanings and messages individuals wish to convey.
Psychological Implications: Review of empirical studies focusing on:
Meaning of colors in clothing psychology
Socio-psychological impact of clothing
Gender (in)equality in clothing choices.
Clothing serves as an essential form of social communication and identity expression.
Introduction
Historical Context: In early civilizations, clothing kept individuals warm; modern purposes include:
Protection
Identification
Modesty
Status
Adornment
Clothing as Identity: Dressing communicates personal wealth, taste and is a significant aspect of one’s reputation.
Hemline Index: The theory suggesting that hemlines reflect economic conditions (longer during recession, shorter in prosperity).
Clothing as Social Interface
Social Tool: Clothing serves as a social interface transmitting personal and collective identity.
Mood Influence: Attire can significantly influence an individual’s mood and feelings.
Cognitive Social Psychology: This review merges concepts from social psychology and fashion behavior studies.
The Meaning of Colors in Clothing Psychology
Color Significance: Color affects visual appeal, communication, and social signaling.
Historical Regulations: Medieval sumptuary laws controlled who could wear certain colors, highlighting social status.
Cultural Influences on Color: Preferences vary across individuals and cultures, leading to unique perceptions of color and corresponding feelings.
Notable Studies:
Jastrow’s study (1893) on color preferences found blue and red as popular choices.
Guilford’s study indicated greens and blues were favored in clothing.
Socio-Psychological Impact of Clothing
Body Image and Clothing Preferences: An individual's body image is integral in shaping clothing choices and self-perception.
Dissonance Effects: Misalignment between attire and social context can lead to negative judgments from others.
Perceptions Based on Formality: Formal clothing signals professionalism while casual wear can suggest familiarity.
Sexuality and Professionalism: Women in provocative attire face negative competency judgments, whereas the right attire can enhance personal power.
Gender (In)equality Regarding Clothing
Men’s Fashion Context: Traditional focus on women's fashion has marginalized men’s fashion studies, but modern interest is growing.
Self-Consciousness in Men: Contrary to stereotypes, men may be more self-conscious regarding clothing choices.
Impact of Attire on Professional Setting: Attire influences perceptions of professionalism and authority in roles such as medical practitioners.
Influence of Major Fashion Brands
Psychological Connection to Brands: Clothing choices link to mood, identity, and emotional decision-making.
Notable Brands:
Gucci: Under Alessandro Michele's direction represents eclecticism and vintage aesthetics.
Vetements: Noted for their unique approach to redefining fashion with streetwear aesthetics.
Supreme: Has created a culture of exclusivity and demand through limited releases and collaborations.
Conclusion
Clothing Functions: Protects, adheres to social norms, acts as a personal statement.
Self-Perception and Social Influence: Clothing impacts both personal self-view and how others perceive individuals.
Interdisciplinary Insights: The review provides a comprehensive understanding of the connection between psychology, clothing choices, and the identity they represent.