Notes on Democracy (Week 2): Introduction to Politics and International Relations
Story: United Kingdom of Alison — is it a democracy?
P3: The setup
King Gary, tyrannical ruler of Garyland, dies; his sister Princess Alison takes over and proclaims amnesty for anti-Gary insurrectionists in the north and east, but not in the south and west.
She calls a referendum to rename the state and creates the United Kingdom of Alison.
Question posed: Is the United Kingdom of Alison a democracy?
P4: Constitutional monarchy and institutions
Alison rejects Absolute Monarchy; forms Constitutional Monarchy with Parliament and government.
Queen Alison remains Head of State; Lady Vicky (Duchess of Data) becomes Prime Minister; Parliament members are proposed by Vicky and approved by the Queen.
Question: Is the United Kingdom of Alison a democracy?
P5: Emergence of political parties and electoral rules
Sir Jason pushes for a more representative Parliament; two-party system and general rules proposed: only homeowners aged over and with no criminal record can stand for election; same eligibility to vote.
Parliament passes the plan; governance splits regionally (East/North vs South/West); three parties emerge: “Data is Supreme”, “Running is Brilliant”, and “Justice for Gary”.
Queen Alison signs the Act of Parliament; a general election invites Lady Vicky’s party to form the government; Sir Jason becomes Leader of the Opposition.
Question: Is the United Kingdom of Alison a democracy?
P6: Reform of voting rights and election outcomes
Sir Jason realises his support base is under 30 and/or not homeowners; proposes dropping homeownership and criminal record requirements; lowers voting/standing age to 18; passes after debate; Sir Jason becomes Prime Minister after a landslide for the “Running is Brilliant” party.
Question: Is the United Kingdom of Alison a democracy?
P7: Civil unrest, state power, and democratic rights
Pete and Chris lead protests; misinformation on social media incites violence; protests become polarized between Alison loyalists and anti-monarchists.
Sir Jason uses emergency legislation to ban noisy protests and introduce identity cards; supports no-platforming of pro-Gary activists.
Pro-Jason media label Pete and Chris as “Enemies of the People.”
Question: Is the United Kingdom of Alison a democracy?
P8: Takeaway from the story
Democracy is multifaceted; there is no one-size-fits-all model.
What does this story tell us about democracy?
Democracy is multifaceted and context-dependent; a single country can exhibit democratic features in some areas and undemocratic traits in others.
The story illustrates tensions between popular sovereignty, representation, rule of law, civil liberties, and political pluralism.
It highlights risks of:
measures that restrict participation (age, homeownership, criminal records),
emergency powers limiting protests and civil liberties, and
manipulation of information and media dynamics in shaping democratic outcomes.
It also demonstrates the danger of “tyranny of the majority” if a popular phase suppresses minority rights (reference to De Tocqueville’s warning).
Definitions of democracy
Sorenson (1993): "A FORM OF GOVERNANCE IN WHICH THE PEOPLE RULE".
Schumpeter (1950): "The democratic method is that institutional arrangement for arriving at political decisions in which individuals acquire the power to decide by means of a competitive struggle for the people’s vote".
Held (1996): "Democracy entails a political community in which there is some form of political equality among the people".
De Tocqueville (1835): warns about the risk of the "tyranny of the majority".
Characteristics of democracy (Dahl, 1989)
Control over government is constitutionally vested in elected officials.
Elected officials are chosen in free, fair, and frequent elections.
Practically all adults have the right to vote in elections (universal suffrage).
Practically all adults have the right to run for elected office.
Citizens have the right to express themselves freely on political matters.
Alternative sources of information are legally and freely available.
Everyone has the right to form parties, pressure groups and other associations independent of the state.
Processes of democratisation: revolutions, regime change, and social contract ideas
Examples and revolutions/regime changes:
Swiss consociation founded in 1291; evolved to power-sharing governance.
English Glorious Revolution (1688): move from absolute to constitutional monarchy.
French and American Revolutions: transfer of power from elites to the masses; birth of citizenship.
End of the Cold War: collapse of communist regimes in Eastern Europe.
Arab Spring.
Social contract theorists: democracy grounded in civil rights via a social contract between the state and citizens (Hobbes; Rousseau).
Processes of democratisation: decolonisation and empire dissolution
Decolonisation: Spanish and Portuguese withdrawal from Central and South America; dissolution of European empires after WWI and WWII.
Important caveat: not all newly independent states became democracies.
Key elements of democratisation
Establishing institutions and procedures to regulate access to power.
Competitive and free elections for all political offices.
Mass suffrage (direct and indirect).
Independent judiciary.
Checks and balances and separation of powers (different branches and levels of governance).
Open and responsive institutions to serve public needs and preferences.
Active and engaged citizenship.
Typologies of democracy
Direct Democracy: direct participation of the electorate beyond voting (e.g., referenda, initiative, recall).
Indirect Democracy: Representative democracy; electorate elects representatives to exercise power on their behalf.
Swiss referenda and recall are classic direct-democracy elements; most modern democracies are indirect.
Activity: Direct democracy vs indirect democracy
What are the relative advantages and constraints of each system?
Democratic backsliding: common causes
Economic inequality.
Culturally conservative reactions to societal changes.
External influence from stronger powers.
States of Emergency.
Promissory coups (incumbent government claims democracy is threatened and is deposed by opponents).
Examples cited: Thailand 2007, Pakistan 1999.
Democratic backsliding: key elements
Restrictions on participation in electoral processes and public sphere.
Reduction in accountability of government to the governed.
Restrictions on civil liberties (e.g., curfews, criminalisation of dissent, banning protests, curtailments on freedom of speech).
Media restrictions.
Cronyism and corruption.
Undermining institutions of justice.
Activity: Can democracies ever be authoritarian?
Prompt for reflection on whether democratic institutions can be co-opted to permit authoritarian practices, or whether erosion always leads to non-democratisation.
Measuring levels of democracy
Economist Democracy Index (EIU) – Our World in Data link: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/democracy-index-eiu
Categories:
Full democracy
Flawed democracy
Hybrid regime
Authoritarian regime
Measures (aspects):
Electoral Process and Pluralism
Functioning of Government
Political Participation
Political Culture
Civil Liberties
Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) – Transparency International: https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2024
Categories: from ‘highly corrupt’ to ‘very clean’
Measures include:
Bribery
Diversion of public funds
Prevalence of officials using public office for private gain
Red tape and bureaucratic burden (which may increase opportunities for corruption)
Meritocratic vs nepotistic appointments in the civil service
Quote from TI chair: corruption as a global threat that undermines development, democracy, stability, and human rights; need for action to address global corruption.
Freedom House (Freedom in the World 2025): https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2025/uphill-battle-to-safeguard-rights
Categories:
Free
Partially Free
Not Free
Measures: Tracks the 30 articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Activity: What do you think the value of such democracy measures might be?
These measures help compare regimes and track changes over time.
They can inform policy, advocacy, and academic research, but may embed biases based on who defines democracy and which elements are weighted more heavily.
Cross-country comparisons must account for context, priority differences, and how elements are scored.
Summary: There is no set template for democracy
Elements vary across countries due to economic, social, and historical factors.
The baseline to be a democracy is relatively low (e.g., competitive elections, suffrage).
Democratisation is variable in order and weight of elements; some elements may appear later or be valued differently across contexts.
Democratic backsliding is a feature of many democracies under stress.
Indices can be useful but watch for biases in who designs and weights them; avoid assuming a single universal template for democracy.
Self-assessment activity (reflective prompts)
Strengths
What are you doing well?
What have you learnt?
What interests you?
Have you identified goals? What are they? How will you pursue them?
Opportunities
What opportunities exist to apply this knowledge?
Weaknesses
What is challenging? What needs improvement? How will you address it for future learning?
Future
How will this learning help you in the future and after this course?