Hong Kong Legal History and the Path to the Basic Law
Introduction
Hong Kong is presented as a unique jurisdiction under the framework of “one country, two systems.”
The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HK SAR) has existed for over years.
There is no single precise definition of a legal system; it can be described as a body of rules/principles, processes, institutions, and personnel.
To understand the future, we must first look to the past and trace the historical development of the HK legal system.
Learning Aims
Examine the lead-up to the birth of the HK SAR by tracing the historical development of the Hong Kong legal system.
Place the Hong Kong legal system into perspective.
Outline the structure of the course.
Upon Colonialisation (Foundations of HK Law)
In , Hong Kong was a fishing port with a few thousand inhabitants under the Qing Dynasty.
Trade restrictions were in effect: maritime trade only; there was a trade imbalance.
The opium trade was a key consequence of imperial commerce: Britain exchanged tea and silk for opium.
Opium trade growth: from chests in to chests in .
Treaty of Nanking (1842) – Foundations of Territory and Governance
The Treaty of Nanking in forced China to open five ports to British trade, require indemnity, and cede Hong Kong Island to Britain.
British traders and the Superintendent of Trade Captain Charles Elliot moved to Hong Kong’s quiet harbour.
Outcome: Britain gained Hong Kong Island and greater leverage over trade and governance.
Treaty of Nanking – Article III (Key Text in Context)
Article III states that British subjects should have a port to maintain and refit ships and keep stores.
China cedes the Island of Hong-Kong to Her Britannic Majesty, to be possessed in perpetuity, and to be governed by laws/regulations directed by Her Majesty.
This establishes the legal basis for British governance over Hong Kong in the early colonial period.
Convention of Peking (1860) – Kowloon and Stonecutters Island
Hostilities against China continued; China was forced to cede Kowloon and Stonecutters Island.
This expanded British control beyond Hong Kong Island.
Convention of Peking (1860) – Article VI
To maintain law and order in Hong Kong harbour, China agrees to cede to Britain, and to Her Heirs and Successors, the portion of Kowloon with a perpetual lease arrangement for Harry Smith Parkes (on behalf of the British Government).
Second Convention of Peking (1898) – The New Territories Lease(ing)
Expansion of British territory into the New Territories via a lease.
The lease term was set to years, and within the leased territory, Great Britain would have sole jurisdiction.
The boundary and surveys would be fixed later by officials from the two governments.
1997 Deadline: The New Territories Order in Council (1898)
The British government issued an Order in Council declaring the New Territories and Kowloon as integrated into Hong Kong.
The territories would be part and parcel of Her Majesty's Colony of Hongkong for all intents and purposes as if originally part of the Colony.
1997 Deadline – Political Context and Realpolitik
The entire Hong Kong territory needed to be treated as a whole when the time came for transfer.
The Kuomintang and Communist governments did not recognize these treaties, viewing them as “unequal treaties.”
There was a desire to avoid disturbing the status quo while Beijing’s interest in reunification with Taiwan grew in the late .
The Nine-Point Plan aimed to ensure HK’s autonomy while integrating with China under a broader framework.
Law in Colonial Hong Kong (Foundations of Legal System under British Rule)
1841 Proclamations: Local Chinese governed by the laws and customs of China; British subjects/foreigners by the principles and practice of British law.
Letters Patent (1843) and the Governor’s powers: The Governor, with the Legislative Council, could make and enact laws for peace, order, and good government; this laid the groundwork for statutory law in HK.
The Governor acted with the advice and consent of the Legislative Council; supplemented by Royal Instructions.
Supreme Court Ordinances – English Law in Hong Kong
Supreme Court Ordinance (No. 15 of 1844): The Law of England was in full force in Hong Kong, except where inapplicable to local circumstances.
Supreme Court Ordinance (No. 3 of 1873) s. 5: English laws in force at the time the colony obtained a local legislature (i.e., on ) remained in force, except where inapplicable or modified by local laws.
This established the principle of the English legal system being retained (with local adaptations).
Application of English Law (Legal Continuity)
English law continued to apply via specific ordinances; the legal framework was modelled on English statutes.
The law in HK thus reflected a hybrid: imported English law with local modifications.
Law in Colonial Hong Kong (Continued)
The Application of English Law Ordinance (1966) § 4(1): The law of England, as set out in the Acts listed, was in force in HK, subject to:
(a) applicability to HK circumstances;
(b) any required modifications;
(c) amendments by Orders in Council, Acts applying to HK, or local Ordinances.
This formalized the cross-border adaptation of English common law and equity in HK.
Conclusion: HK’s legislation in the colonial period was heavily modelled on English statutes and common law, with local modifications.
Autonomy and Governance under Colonial Rule
The Japanese occupation disrupted colonial governance and highlighted limits to external control.
Post-WWII decolonization policy affected HK differently; autonomy was pursued but within a colonial framework.
Stereotypes of the Governor as an autocrat were challenged; there were pragmatic reforms.
1958: Period marked by “independence in economic affairs,” signaling a shift toward economic self-sufficiency and policy autonomy.
Lord MacLehose’s New Deal (late 1960s–1970s) emphasized modernization and political reform, contributing to HK’s path toward eventual autonomy under a different framework.
Sino-British Joint Declaration (1984) – The Blueprint for HK after 1997
As 1997 approached, there was concern from the business community about land leases and the smooth handover.
Beijing recognized a pragmatic leadership under Deng Xiaoping, and China agreed to deal with HK first under a framework that would preserve economic and social stability.
The “one country, two systems” formula was to be applied to HK first, guiding the transition.
The Joint Declaration laid down the blueprint for HK as a Special Administrative Region (SAR) after 1997.
Paragraph 3: HK would enjoy a high degree of autonomy (except for defense and foreign affairs), vested executive, legislative, and independent judicial powers; laws in force would largely remain unchanged; the social and economic systems would remain intact; rights and freedoms preserved; HK responsible for public order; the arrangement would remain effectively unchanged for 50 years.
Sino-British Joint Declaration – Ratification and Legalization
The Joint Declaration was formally ratified on .
Paragraph 1: China decided to resume sovereignty over HK with effect from .
Paragraph 2: Britain would restore HK to the People's Republic of China.
Paragraph 3(12): The basic policies regarding HK would be stipulated in the Basic Law, by the National People's Congress (NPC), and would remain unchanged for years; Annex I elaborates these policies.
It is an international treaty setting the stage for constitutional arrangement and long-term guarantees.
Drafting the Basic Law (Transitional Constitutional Framework)
The Basic Law Drafting Committee was established by China’s National People’s Congress.
HK representation: 23 of 59 members came from Hong Kong; Basic Law Consultative Committee comprised 180 HK members; no formal law-making role for the Consultative Committee during drafting.
Provisional Legislative Council (pre-1997) participated in preparatory work.
Adoption of the Basic Law (1990) and the Birth of the HK SAR
The Hong Kong Basic Law was adopted as national law by the NPC on .
HK Special Administrative Region was established and would come into being on .
This marked the legal foundation for the post-1997 framework within which HK would operate as an SAR under Chinese sovereignty.
Conclusion
Timeframe: From to , HK’s legal system evolved from a dual-legal framework to a more integrated arrangement under the framework established by the Joint Declaration and the Basic Law.
Core themes:
Importation and adaptation of English law, creating a mixed legal system.
The Sino-British Joint Declaration provided the overarching framework for “one country, two systems.”
The Basic Law codified autonomy, continuity, and rights protections for HK for a 50-year horizon post-1997.
The course will continue with governance in Hong Kong post-1997, building on the legal foundations outlined above.
Key Dates and Provisions (Reference Quick Guide)
: Colonial foundation in HK as a fishing port under Qing.
: Treaty of Nanking establishes HK Island cession and early governance.
: Convention of Peking expands territory to Kowloon and Stonecutters Island (Article VI).
: Second Convention of Peking – New Territories leased for years; sole jurisdiction for Britain within leased area.
: New Territories Order in Council integrates New Territories and Kowloon into HK Colony (as part of HK, for all intents and purposes).
: Nine-point plan and reforms guiding HK autonomy inside a PRC framework.
: Sino-British Joint Declaration; 12-point plan; HK to retain existing legal system; high degree of autonomy; 50-year continuity principle.
: Joint Declaration formally ratified.
: Transfer of sovereignty to PRC; HK becomes SAR.
: Basic Law adopted by NPC; framework for post-1997 governance.
years: Duration of the autonomy protections under the Joint Declaration/Basic Law (until 2047).