Chapter 3
Measurement and Measures of Association
Course Details
Course Code: PSYC 385
Course Title: Psychological Test
Semester: Fall 2025
Outline
Measurement and Describing Data
Measures of Central Tendency and Variability
Normal Curve and Standard Scores
Correlation and Inferences
Meta-analysis
Learning Objectives
Objective 1: Be able to interpret the basic descriptions of data and the potential implications of sample characteristics.
Objective 2: Interpret correlational results and the potential implications.
Objective 3: Understand common standardization techniques.
Scales of Measurement
Nominal: Categorization or classification
Example: DSM-5-TR
Ordinal: Classifications but also rank ordered
Example: Level of severity
Interval: Equal intervals between numbers
Examples: Temperature, SAT scores
Ratio: Has a true zero unlike the others
Example: Time
Most psychological tests are often treated as interval levels for statistical purposes.
Describing and Comparing Data Distributions
A set of test scores arrayed from a test or study.
Raw Score: A straightforward numerical accounting of performance.
Frequency Distribution: All scores listed alongside the number of times each score occurred.
Frequency Distributions
May be presented in tabular form.
Grouped Frequency Distribution: Displays scores in class intervals rather than actual test scores.
Example of Grouped Frequency Distribution
Class Interval | Frequency (f) |
|---|---|
95-99 | 1 |
90-94 | 2 |
85-89 | 2 |
80-84 | 3 |
75-79 | 3 |
70-74 | 2 |
65-69 | 0 |
60-64 | 1 |
55-59 | 0 |
50-54 | 2 |
45-49 | 0 |
40-44 | 0 |
Graphical Representations
A Histogram is a graph with vertical lines drawn at the true limits of each test score or class interval, forming a series of contiguous rectangles.
Measures of Central Tendency
Central Tendency: A statistic that indicates the average or midmost score between extreme scores in a distribution.
Mean: Sum of observations divided by the number of observations.
Median: The middle value in a distribution; particularly useful when outliers are present.
Mode: The most frequently occurring score in a distribution.
If two scores occur most frequently, the distribution is termed bimodal.
Visual Representation
Diagrams illustrating median, mean, and mode in various distributions.
Measures of Variability
Variability: An indication of the degree to which scores are scattered or dispersed within a distribution.
Distributions may have the same mean but different variabilities, affecting interpretations.
Key Measures of Variability
Range: The difference between the highest and lowest scores.
Interquartile Range (IQR): Difference between the third (Q3) and first (Q1) quartiles of a distribution.
Variance: The arithmetic mean of the squares of the differences between scores in a distribution and their mean.
Standard Deviation (SD): The square root of the variance, representing typical distances of scores from the mean.
Skewness and Kurtosis
Skewness: The extent of asymmetry in a distribution.
Positive skew: Clustering of scores near the low end.
Negative skew: Clustering of scores near the high end.
Kurtosis: The peakedness of a distribution.
Platykurtic: Relatively flat.
Leptokurtic: Relatively peaked.
Mesokurtic: Intermediate form.
Types of Distributions
Normal Distribution: Bell-shaped curve.
Bimodal Distribution: Two modes present.
Skewed Distributions: Positive or negative skew, differing forms such as J-shaped curve or rectangular distribution.
The Normal Curve
A mathematically defined, smooth bell-shaped curve that is symmetrical and follows a specific frequency distribution pattern.
Area under the normal curve can be divided into sections based on standard deviations.
Standard Scores
Purpose: To compare scores across different distributions or studies and to normalize skewed data.
Z-score: A score indicating how many standard deviations a raw score is above or below the mean; mean = 0.
T-score: A standard score where the mean is set at 50 and the standard deviation at 10.
Application of Standard Scores
Useful for comparing individuals and different studies.
Particularly beneficial for highly skewed data.
Example Study
Study Title: Modifying Instructions on the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for Military Populations Does Not Change Symptom Reporting.
Authors: Lyndon A. Riviere, PhD, Edward N. Edens, PhD, among others.
Objective: Investigate whether modifications in instructions affect PTSD symptom reporting and prevalence rates.
Sample: 1691 soldiers randomly assigned to different versions of the PCL.
Findings: No statistically significant differences in PTSD symptom reporting across PCL versions.
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL)
Versions: PCL-Civilian, PCL-Specific stressor, PCL-Military.
Each version includes 17 items with variations in wording for military and civilian contexts.
Symptom Clusters: Intrusion, avoidance, hyperarousal; cutoff score of 50 indicates PTSD.
Sample Demographics and Combat Exposure
Data summarized showing mean ages, gender distribution, education level, race/ethnicity, rank, and marital status of participants in the study.
Correlation and Inference
Correlation describes the strength of the relationship between two variables.
Correlation Coefficients: Ranges from -1 to +1; zero indicates no correlation.
Positive Correlation: As one variable increases, so does the other.
Negative Correlation: As one variable increases, the other decreases.
Correlation does not imply causation but aids in hypothesis testing.
Methods of Correlation
Pearson r: For linear relationships between continuous variables; check for statistical significance typically at p < .05.
Spearman Rho: For small sample sizes or ordinal variables.
Scatterplots
Graphical representation of correlation; depict relationships between two variables.
Strong correlations are characterized by tightly clustered points.
Outliers
Outlier: An atypical data point lying far from other points in a scatterplot; can significantly affect correlations.
Meta-Analysis
Purpose: To examine relationships across multiple studies for a comprehensive view.
Outputs include a single estimate often represented as a correlation coefficient.
Important considerations include the variability of dropout rates among different studies on PTSD treatments.
Conclusion on Meta-Analysis
Highlights dropout from PTSD treatments; indicates that dropout is not necessarily correlated with the trauma focus of treatments, requiring further exploration.