Yashar-RaceMatterLatin-2015
Overview of Race and Ethnicity in Latin American Politics
Author: Deborah J. Yashar
Source: Foreign Affairs, March/April 2015
Historical Context of Indigenous Rights
Rigoberta Menchu: Received Nobel Prize in 1992 for promoting indigenous rights; indicative of broader political changes.
Indigenous movements emerged in the 1980s and 1990s across Latin America (Bolivia, Ecuador, Guatemala, Mexico).
Reforms included constitutional amendments recognizing indigenous people and laws supporting bicultural education and affirmative action.
Shifts in Racial and Ethnic Identity
Underlying historical forces: indigenous empires, colonialism, African slave trade.
Latin American governments historically promoted national unity and racial mixing, suppressing ethnic distinctions.
Racial identity in Latin America is fluid; individuals may identify differently based on context (e.g., indigenous at home, mestizo at school).
Continued Marginalization
Despite civil representation, indigenous and Afro-descendant communities face ongoing economic and political disadvantages:
Higher poverty rates and mortality compared to white counterparts.
Lack of tradition in identity politics hampers group mobilization.
The Myth of Unity
Independence movements (early 19th century) led by colonizers, emphasizing national unity and downplaying racial differences.
Contrasts with U.S. legislation that codified racial inequality.
Latin American ideas of national identity incorporated mixed-race ideals, celebrated in various forms (e.g., "the cosmic race").
Various categories (mestizo, zambo, mulatto) emerged as mixed heritage became common.
Impact of Economic Policies
Corporatist regimes aimed at class-based reform often ignored racial and ethnic diversity, leading to systemic inequalities persisting among black and indigenous populations.
Labor and welfare programs unintentionally strengthened rural indigenous communities.
Transition to Neoliberalism
1980s and 1990s neoliberal reforms led to a decline in state support for indigenous communities.
Loss of access to land and economic resources prompted mobilization along ethnic lines:
Increased demands for official recognition of ethnic diversity and indigenous rights.
Contemporary Movements and Recognition
The 1990s saw growing indigenous protest movements with demands for constitutional recognition and rights.
Global support from international organizations like the UN bolstered these movements.
Many nations have reformed constitutions to recognize ethnic diversity and communal properties.
Conclusion: Challenges Ahead
Despite advances, Afro-descendants remain politically less mobilized than indigenous groups.
Recent affirmative action policies (e.g., Brazil's 2012 law) signal progress but still require sustained effort.
Latin America’s diverse identities demand ongoing political engagement to address lingering inequalities in wages, health, and education.