Lecture 2 State and State-building (2)

Page 1

  • Comparative Politics: State-Building Interventions & Peacebuilding

  • Instructor: Dr. Andrea Purdeková

  • Contact: a.purdekoya@bath.ac.uk

  • Location: 1WN 4.02a

Page 2: Key Questions

  • Core Questions:

    • What is the link between war, peace, and state formation?

    • What defines a state, and how does it differ from other political organizations?

    • How do the state formations in Europe compare to those in Africa?

    • What is the 'bellicist' theory of state formation? How robust is it?

    • Does state weakness lead to conflict, and does state-building foster peace?

    • What are critiques of international state-building and reconstruction efforts?

Page 3: Core Concepts

  • Analytical Distinctions:

    • Government vs. regime vs. state

    • Juridical statehood vs. empirical statehood

    • Concepts of state weakness, failure, and collapse

Page 4: What is a State?

  • Contested Concept:

    • Structure, actor, or set of ideas?

    • Instrument of government or entity with autonomous power? (Mann's theory)

    • Boundary between state and society is fluid; termed ‘state effects’ (Mitchell)

    • Core functions: security, governance, and service provision.

Page 5: Characteristics of a State

  • Definition by Max Weber:

    • A "human community that claims the monopoly of legitimate violence within a territory."

Page 6: Characteristics of a State

  • Definition by Charles Tilly:

    • States as coercion-wielding organizations distinct from households and kinship groups.

    • They exercise priority over other organizations in defined territories.

Page 7: Security and Governance

  • Dual Nature of Security:

    • Security can be comforting or ominous (Tilly).

    • Tilly views the state as an organized security racket, claiming to provide protection while often creating threats.

Page 8: State-Building in Europe

  • Bellicist Theory (Tilly):

    • "War made the state, and the state made war."

    • Major mobilizations for war from AD 990 led to state expansion and organization.

    • The process involved building up coercive means and concentrating violence within state structures.

Page 9: European State-Building Process

  • Gaining Monopoly Over Violence:

    • Achieved gradually through disarmament of civilians.

    • War-making contributed to the creation of state structures, including military and taxation systems.

    • Increased accountability to popular demands leads to bargaining.

Page 10: European State Functions

  • Essential Activities of States:

    • Security: internal and external defense;

    • War-making: confronting rivals;

    • Protection: safeguarding allies;

    • Extraction: collecting resources from the population.

Page 11: Expanding State Roles

  • Activities Beyond Security:

    • Adjudication: Resolving disputes within the population.

    • Production: Managing goods and services.

    • Distribution: Allocating resources.

    • Bargaining: Negotiating rights and freedoms with the populace.

Page 12: State-Building in Africa

  • Key Differences:

    • Modern states imported rather than organically grown.

    • Different political geography and peaceful post-colonial state adoption.

    • Implications for state functionality and development.

Page 13: Nature of Power in Africa

  • Non-Territorial Power Dynamics:

    • Unlike Europe, land was plentiful; no need for warfare over land.

    • Focus on capturing people and resources; power extended over less densely populated areas.

Page 14: Stability of African Boundaries

  • Independence Implications:

    • Post-independence boundaries respected, fostering a collaborative order (Herbst).

    • In contrast to European state-making history linked to warfare.

Page 15: State Weakness in Africa

  • Factors Influencing Weakness:

    • Lack of external threats reduces defense incentives.

    • Limited taxation capabilities; low economic base translates to weak governance.

    • Elites may not risk territorial loss through inadequate governance.

Page 16: Geography and Governance Challenges

  • Diversity in Management:

    • Difficult terrains like the DRC as 'rimland' states complicate governance.

    • Variability in governance challenges, though geography is not destiny.

Page 17: Issues in State Weakness Discourse

  • Critiques on State Weakness Narratives:

    • Promotes harmful representations of governance.

    • Oversimplifies complex political orders and contexts.

    • Links between state weakness and violence are not straightforward.

Page 18: Harmful Representations

  • Consequences of Weakness Discourse:

    • Reinforces Northern dominance and historical amnesia.

    • Positions certain state models as universal, legitimizing foreign intervention.

Page 19: Obscured Forms of Order

  • New Perspectives:

  • Focus on alternative states and hybridity rather than simply 'fragile' states.

  • Recognizing how order manifests in diverse contexts.

Page 20: Case of Somalia

  • Empirical Statehood in Somaliland:

    • Declared independence in 1991 but lacks international recognition.

    • Puntland declared independence in 1998 amid ongoing disputes.

Page 21: Afghanistan’s Informal Governance

  • Self-Governing Organizations:

    • Rural governance relies on customary systems providing public goods.

    • Traditional order does not hinder state development.

Page 22: Parallel States and Rebel Governance

  • Kosovo Case Study:

    • Examination of conflict and parallel state structures.

    • Inquiry into how conflict may enhance forms of governance.

Page 23: States in Exile

  • Rwandan and Sahrawi Cases:

    • Rwandan Hutu camps (1994-1996) and Sahrawi camps in Algeria as illustrative examples of state structures in exile.

Page 24: Weakness and Conflict Relationship

  • Complex Causation:

    • State weakness does not uniformly lead to violence; only a subset of weak states experience civil conflict.

    • Requires extensive understanding of various contributing factors to state fragility.

Page 25: International State-Building Challenges

  • Post-Conflict Reconstruction Complex:

    • Billions spent on state-building; many conflicts revert to violence despite external aid.

    • Questions arise on the causes of limited success in state-building initiatives.

Page 26: Iraq Case Study

  • 2003 Invasion Aftermath:

    • Initial quick regime change followed by insecurity and the rise of armed groups.

    • Marked as exogenous state-building where external powers shape state capacity.

Page 27: DRC's State-Building Challenges

  • Protracted Conflicts:

    • Ongoing violence complicates state-building responses.

    • Local competing forms of order compromise legitimate governance and state function.

Page 28: Somalia's Failed State Recovery

  • International Attempts:

    • Ongoing distrust in central government hampers rebuilding efforts.

    • Somalia's Al-Shabaab remains a significant ongoing threat.

Page 29: South Sudan’s Independence and Challenges

  • Newest Independent State:

    • Major civil war leading to independence in 2011; subsequent descent into conflict in 2013.

    • Various infrastructural and unification challenges hinder state-building.

Page 30: Broader Critiques of State-Building

  • Tensions in Approaches:

    • Conflicts between peace-building and state-making can lead to harmful outcomes.

    • Focuses too much on institutional capacity at the cost of public legitimacy and accountability.

Page 31: Legitimacy of Intervention

  • State-Building as Interventionism:

    • Examining whether state-building equates to neo-imperialism.

    • UK’s historical parallels with the US state-building experiences in the Middle East.

    • Failures in preventing conflict recurrence and creation of ineffective state structures.