Pure Exchange Model: Indifference Curves, Endowments, Edgeworth Box, and Terms of Trade
Pure Exchange Model: Key Assumptions
Two individuals: Smith and Jones
Goods: apples (A) and oranges (O); homogeneous
Preferences: more is better; diminishing marginal utility
Utility measured in utils; can rank bundles, even if exact numbers are not comparable across people
Endowments: ES = (O,A) = (10,0), \, EJ = (O,A) = (0,10)
Trade: mutually voluntary; individuals maximize utility; perfect knowledge of goods and quality
Edgeworth box represents total resources: O{total}=10,\ A{total}=10
Implicit vs explicit assumptions noted; later relaxations allow for intermediation, communication, etc.
Indifference Curves: Visualization and Rules
Indifference curve: all allocations giving same utility
More is better ⇒ curves located up and to the right; higher curves imply higher utility
Curves are bowed toward the origin due to diminishing marginal utility
Endowment point lies on the box; moving to other points shows possible trade outcomes
Terms: bundle, allocation refer to a specific point on the graph
Endowments and Edgeworth Box
Edgeworth box dimensions equal total goods: O{total}=10,\ A{total}=10
Endowment points within the box: Smith at ES=(10,0); Jones at EJ=(0,10)
Overlay of both individuals’ indifference curves on the box shows all feasible allocations
Trade is represented by moving along diagonals (exchange) within the box
Trade: The Lens and Gains from Exchange
The region between the two individuals’ indifference curves through the endowment forms a lens (eye-shape)
Moving from endowment to a point in the lens makes both better off (mutual gains)
Intuition: diminishing marginal utility means the first few units of the new good are highly valued; e.g., Smith prefers first apple over his tenth orange
One-for-one trade can be sufficient to improve both, moving to higher indifference curves
Surplus value: additional welfare from trade not captured by simple dollar-value measures of goods; trade can increase total welfare beyond initial endowment
Terms of Trade (TOT) and Prices
TOT expresses the rate of exchange between goods: ext{TOT} = rac{pO}{pA}
Units: apples per orange (or its reciprocal: oranges per apple)
If asked for TOT in terms of PO/PA, ensure it corresponds to the intended direction (apples per orange vs oranges per apple)
Example: moving from endowment e to a one-for-one trade yields ext{TOT} = 1 (one orange per one apple)
Why Trade Happens: Intuition and Welfare
With more is better and diminishing MU, endowments differ, creating opportunities for mutually beneficial trades
The lens shows allocations where both agents achieve higher utility than at the endowment
If trade occurs and is voluntary, both parties can be better off; non-selfish motives are not required for gains
Quick Reference Points
Edgeworth box captures all feasible allocations for two agents with fixed totals
Endowments determine the starting point for potential gains from trade
Intermediaries (e.g., information channels) can affect reachability, but the basic lens concept remains core
Key takeaway: under the basic assumptions, trade is win-win and creates surplus value beyond simple dollar-value measures