Detailed Notes on the Equity Method of Accounting
Introduction to the Equity Method
The equity method of accounting applies when an investor has significant influence over an investee.
Significant influence is defined as owning more than 20% but less than 50% of the voting shares of a company.
Control occurs when ownership exceeds 50%, at which point a different accounting treatment applies.
Key Definitions and Concepts
Significant Influence: Ownership of more than 20% but less than 50% allows the investor to sway decisions and possibly have board representation.
Investment Accounting: Under the equity method, initial investment costs are recorded as assets, and adjustments are made for net income/loss and certain other transactions, unlike fair value accounting.
Application of the Equity Method
Scenario Example:
An entity (United Intergroup) purchases 30% stake in another company (Argent Inc) for $1.5 million.
The total valuation of Argent based on this investment is $5 million, calculated as $1.5 million 0 ext{%} = $5 million.
Identification of Net Assets
Argent possesses identifiable net assets comprising:
Buildings, land, accounts receivable, and inventory
Total identifiable net assets at book value: $2,100,000
Fair value assessment as of date of investment indicates assets are actually worth:
Buildings: $2,000,000
Land: $1,000,000
Other identifiable assets: $600,000
Total fair value of net identifiable assets: $3,600,000
Recognition of $1,400,000 goodwill based on the premium paid over the identifiable net assets value.
Equity Method Accounting Journal Entries
Initial Investment:
Debit: Investment in Equity Affiliate $1,500,000
Credit: Cash $1,500,000
Recording Share of Income:
Total net income of Argent for the period is $500,000.
Share (30% of $500,000) = $150,000.
Debit: Investment in Equity Affiliate $150,000
Credit: Investment Revenue $150,000
Note: No cash was received from this income.
Dividends Received:
Argent pays total dividends of $250,000.
Share of dividends (30%) = $75,000.
Debit: Cash $75,000
Credit: Investment in Equity Affiliate $75,000
Rationale: Dividends represent a return of investment rather than income under this method.
Adjustments Regarding Goodwill and Fair Value
The investor must consider premium payments as well as the fair value of the identifiable net assets.
Amortization of Goodwill: Adjustments made in net income to account for possible impacts on future earnings due to the premium paid. This is treated somewhat like a consolidation accounting method.
Depreciation Adjustments: Higher fair value necessitates increased depreciation expenses over time; $30,000 per year for ten years based on building fair value increase.
Impairment Considerations
An investment may be deemed impaired if the fair value falls below its carrying value and is considered other than temporary.
Under such circumstances, an impairment loss is recognized which adjusts the carrying value down to fair value immediately.
If the investee reports a loss, the investor's share of that loss must be recorded in their income statement.
Transitioning Between Accounting Methods
From Equity Method to Fair Value: Transition typically occurs due to dilution of ownership below 20%. Market value will be recorded post-dilution.
From Fair Value to Equity Method: Occurs typically when significant influence is obtained through increased ownership.
Sale of Equity Investment
When selling an equity investment, the following steps are followed:
Debit Cash for the sale amount
Credit Investment in Equity Affiliate for the carrying value associated with the investment.
Any gain or loss from the sale is recognized in the income statement directly.
Comparison of Methods
Equity Method: Involves share of net income, no fair value adjustments on the investment, treatment of dividends differently.
Fair Value Through Net Income: More straightforward, income and dividend treatment through direct cash, adjusted to market value regularly.
Conclusion
The equity method serves as an accounting framework that reflects significant influence over an investment entity in a more nuanced manner than simple fair value accounting.
Differences in accounting treatments between these two methods reflect the underlying economic realities and motivation for influencing the investee's operations and financial reporting.