Specific fees for new work filings indicated (example: $40 filing fee).
2. Parts Fee Calculation
Calculated based on the job scope.
Example calculation:
If one item is entered with a price of $8.96, parts fee = $12 × $8.96.
Issues and Bug Reports in the System
1. Reported Bugs
Issues with the total fee calculations (e.g., $1.86 expected but incorrectly showing $2.98).
2. Payment Calculations
Minimum payment structures enforced:
Users are required to pay at least a certain amount ($1.30) regardless of calculated fees.
3. Fee Exemptions
Specific owner types (e.g., NYC agency) result in exempt fees.
Required documents need to be uploaded for exemption claims.
Post Approval Amendment (PA)
Adding Scope After Initial Filing
Process for updating initial job filings with additional scope using PA.
Limited editing capabilities observed in PA (e.g., some fields disabled).
Auto-Approve Feature
PAs don’t require a workflow; approvals are automatic upon submission.
Merging Changes from Post Approval Amendments
1. Expected Merging Behavior
Changes made in PA should reflect in the original job filing after approval.
Example scenarios discussed where expected fields didn't merge correctly.
2. Documenting Issues with Merging
Certain sections specifically highlighted for lacking merge functionality (e.g., electrical job categories not updating).
Validation and System Integrity Checks
1. Need for CRM Verification
Validation of these issues needing access to the CRM side for verification.
Documentation and review expected from designated team members.
2. Identify Specific Fields Affected by Bugs
Listing out specific fields that show inconsistencies or bugs to help in code troubleshooting.
Conclusion
Final remarks on the ongoing nature of the job filing and documentation process in the system, emphasizing error tracking and effective communication among team members for resolution.