Products Liability

Introduction to Products Liability

  • Paraphrasing John Lennon, the lecture introduces the concept of products liability, which addresses injuries caused by defective products.

  • The aim of product liability law is to change the world by ensuring compensation for those injured by defective products.

Definition of Products Liability

  • Products liability is a broad term covering a supplier's responsibility for injuries caused by a defective product they distributed.

  • It is not a standalone tort theory but a collection of rules from various tort theories applied to injuries from product defects.

  • Products liability can also be litigated under contract warranty theories, but the focus is on tort theories.

Tort Theories in Products Liability

  • Intentional Torts:

    • Example: A baker intentionally puts a rock in a torte for a customer they have a feud with.

  • Negligence:

    • A rock is unintentionally present in the torte due to a lack of ordinary care in the production process.

  • Strict Liability:

    • Liability is imposed if the torte has a defect, regardless of whether ordinary care was exercised.

Types of Defects

  • Manufacturing Defects:

    • Defects that occur during the manufacturing process, making a product more dangerous.

    • Example: A ladder missing its nonslip coating on one rung due to a manufacturing error.

  • Design Defects:

    • Defects inherent in the product's design, making all products of that design equally dangerous.

    • Example: A ladder designed with thinner aluminum and smaller rivets, causing it to collapse under normal weight.

  • Packaging Defects:

    • Defects related to the product's packaging, such as misprinted or missing labels.

  • Information Defects:

    • Defects where critical information is missing, like ingredients on a food label.

    • Example: A torte sold without a label indicating it contains nuts, leading to an allergic reaction.

    • Includes misstated product information or flawed user instructions.

  • Inadequate or Missing Warnings:

    • Failure to provide sufficient warnings about potential dangers associated with product use.

    • Examples:

      • Warning labels on gasoline cans about the risk of storing near open flames.

      • Warning labels on swimming pools indicating shallow water and the danger of diving.

      • Warning labels on electrical appliances about the danger of use near water.

Proof Required for Each Type of Defect

  • Manufacturing Defect:

    • The plaintiff must prove the product was dangerous beyond the expectation of an ordinary consumer due to a departure from its intended design.

    • Example: A torte with a rock in it is dangerous and unexpected.

  • Design Defect:

    • The plaintiff must demonstrate that a less dangerous, economically feasible alternative existed.

    • Factors considered:

      • Usefulness and desirability of the product.

      • Availability of safer alternatives.

      • Likely seriousness of injury from the design.

      • Whether the danger is obvious to the user.

      • Public expectations regarding the danger.

      • Feasibility of eliminating the danger.

    • Example: A ladder designed to collapse under the average adult's weight has a design defect because safer alternatives are feasible.

Foreseeable Misuse

  • Manufacturers must account for foreseeable misuse of their products.

  • Examples:

    • Standing on the top of a ladder.

    • Using a clothes iron to straighten hair.

  • Foreseeability can be tricky, but manufacturers are expected to consider common misuses.

Ladders and Foreseeable Misuse

  • Ladders often have warning labels about not standing on the top step, but people still do it.

  • Safer ladders (e.g., with handrails) exist but may not be economically feasible or desirable for the average homeowner due to cost and storage issues.