Notes: The Organization and Structure of Banking and the Financial-Services Industry

1.2 Introduction

  • Purpose: Understand the causes that have dramatically changed the structure, size, and types of organizations dominating the financial-services industry, beyond just size and performance.
  • Key idea: A financial institution’s role and size are not the only determinants of how it is organized or how well it performs; organizational forms have evolved over time.
  • Connection to prior material: Builds on Chapter 1 which explored banks’ roles and services and the competition faced by banks and other financial institutions.

1.2.2 The Organization and Structure of the Commercial Banking Industry

  • Commercial banking is the dominant supplier of credit and payments services to businesses and households.
  • Size dispersion:
    • Many U.S. banks are small by global standards; the smallest institutions held little more than 1%1\% of total industry assets. 1%=0.011\% = 0.01 of assets.
    • The United States also contains some of the largest financial-service organizations: Citigroup, JP Morgan Chase, and Bank of America together hold about 6×10126\times 10^{12} USD in assets (roughly 6 trillion6\ \text{trillion}).
  • Concentration trend: Banking is increasingly concentrated across the entire size spectrum.
    • The 100100 largest U.S. banks hold close to 90%90\% of industry-wide assets as of 31 December 200931\ December\ 2009.
    • Market share of these large banks has continued to rise into more recent periods.

1.2.3 Internal Organization of the Banking Firm

  • Huge size differences lead to marked differences in internal organization and the range of financial services offered.
  • Community banks vs wholesale banks:
    • Community banks: focus on local deposits and loans; often referred to as retail banks; maintain close contact between top management and division staff.
    • Wholesale banks: typically serve larger clients and may operate more complex product lines.
  • Community banks are more exposed to local economic health and regulatory changes; trend shows declines in numbers and market share: from 14,00014{,}000 community banks in 19851985 to about 6,0006{,}000 in 20102010.

1.2.4 The Array of Organizational Structures and Types in the Banking Industry

  • Distinctions among types of financial institutions can be confusing due to many forms.
  • Key types include:
    • Insured banks
    • State chartered banks
    • National banks
    • Member banks
  • The structure options range from unit banking to branching, holding companies, and electronic services.

1.2.4: Exhibit context (structural references)

  • Exhibit references provide examples of how these structures are drawn or organized (e.g., organization charts for smaller community banks, money-center banks, and electronic/branching arrangements).

1.2.4: Unit Banking and Branching (internal organization by structure)

  • Unit banking: one office provides all services; limited-service facilities (drive-up windows, ATMs) may exist.
  • Continuation of unit banks is common because many customers prefer smaller, locally connected institutions.
  • Growth into branching organizations occurs as firms scale up, offering a full range of services from multiple locations.

1.2.4: Branching Organization Details

  • Branching offers the full range of services across locations with a home office and multiple full-service branches, plus a network of drive-ins, ATMs, POS terminals, and online channels.
  • Senior management typically at the home office; each branch has its own management team with limited decision authority.
  • Exhibit 3–6 depicts the Branch Banking Organization (visual representation of the branching structure).
  • Expansion drivers:
    • Growth from the Great Depression era to the early 21st century saw a shift from few to many branches (roughly from one in five banks with full-service branches during the 1930s to an average of about 1212 full-service branches per bank by the early 2000s).
    • Demographic shifts (urban to suburban) contributed to branching expansion.
  • Legislative milestone: The Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 19941994 enabled expansion across state lines, although recent years show some slowdown in new branch openings.
  • Table 3–2 captures the growth of U.S. commercial bank branch offices over time.

1.2.4: Electronic Branching – Online and Electronic Networks

  • Electronic branches include: Websites, Internet banking, ATMs, POS terminals, PCs, call centers, and virtual banks.
  • Question: Are electronic channels a substitute or supplement to traditional branches? They can be both, depending on the bank’s strategy and customer needs.
  • Exhibit 3–7 illustrates electronic banking systems and networks as an effective alternative to full-service branches.

1.2.5 Holding Company Organizations and Interstate Expansion

  • Bank holding companies (BHCs): a corporation chartered to hold the stock of at least one bank, often with other businesses.
  • Growth drivers for holding companies include access to capital markets, higher leverage, tax advantages, and diversification opportunities beyond banking.
  • The Riegle-Neal Act (1994) and related reforms supported interstate expansion and holding company growth by allowing cross-state acquisitions and nationwide branching.
  • The 1990s and 2000s saw rapid growth of holding-company structures and the rise of multibank holding companies.
  • One-bank vs multibank holding companies: most registered BHCs are one-bank firms, but many control nonbank businesses as well; some are multibank holdings controlling a large share of assets.
  • Holdings can enable risk diversification and access to new revenue streams, but critics argue they can reduce local competition and community capital.
  • Exhibit 3–9 illustrates the Financial Holding Company (FHC) concept.

1.2.6 Financial Holding Companies (FHCs)

  • Under Gramm-Leach-Bliley (GLB) Act, FHCs can offer the broadest range of financial services, including dealing in and underwriting securities and selling/underwriting insurance.
  • Structure of FHCs:
    • Each affiliated financial firm maintains its own capital, management, profits or losses, separate from other affiliates.
    • Some protection against company-wide losses, promoting diversification within the group.
  • Result: Greater consolidation and convergence within the financial-services industry.
  • Exhibit 3–9 presents the FHC concept; Exhibit 3–6, Exhibit 3–8 illustrate holding structures.

1.2.7 Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A)

  • M&A activity has reshaped the sector through branching, BHCs, and FHCs.
  • Since 19801980, more than 12,00012{,}000 bank mergers occurred in the United States.
  • Reasons for M&A: economies of scale, product-line expansion, geographic diversification, risk sharing, and access to capital.

1.2.8 The Changing Organization and Structure of Banking’s Principal Competitors

  • Principal competitors include: credit unions, savings associations, finance companies, insurance firms, security dealers, hedge funds, and other financial firms.
  • All are affected by rising operating costs and rapid technology change; hedge funds were a notable exception for a long period.
  • Convergence: firms across different sectors are increasingly offering similar menus of financial services.
  • Great structural and organizational changes have spilled over across the entire financial-services industry.

1.2.9 Efficiency and Size: Do Bigger Financial Firms Operate at Lower Cost?

  • Key question: Do larger firms operate at lower cost through economies of scale and/or economies of scope?
  • Evidence:
    • Moderate economies of scale are observed in banking.
    • Economies of scope are less consistently evident across studies.
  • Nonbank financial firms often show similar patterns to banking firms in terms of scale and scope dynamics.
  • Exhibit 3–10 shows the most efficient sizes for banks and selected other financial firms.

1.2.10 Financial Firm Goals: Their Impact on Operating Cost, Efficiency, and Performance

  • Expense-Preference Behavior:
    • When management prioritizes personal benefits for managers rather than stockholders or the public, cost control and efficiency may be neglected.
  • Agency Theory:
    • Analyzes the relationship between owners (stockholders) and managers (agents).
    • Investigates whether mechanisms exist to compel managers to maximize owners’ welfare.
    • Lower agency costs and better performance depend on effective corporate governance.

Quick Quiz (from the quick quiz at the end of the chapter)

  • What trends are affecting the way banks and their competitors are organized today?
  • What trend in branch banking has been prominent in the United States in recent years?
  • What is a bank holding company?
  • Are there significant advantages or disadvantages for holding companies or the public if these companies acquire banks or nonbank ventures?
  • Can you see any advantages to allowing interstate banking? What about potential disadvantages?
  • What relationship appears to exist between bank size, efficiency, and operating costs per unit of service produced and delivered?

Key definitions and concepts for quick reference

  • Bank holding company (BHC): A corporation that holds the stock of at least one bank, often with other businesses. extBHCsenablecross−ownershipanddiversification.ext{BHCs enable cross-ownership and diversification.}
  • Financial holding company (FHC): Under the GLB Act, a holding company that may offer a broad range of financial services (banking, securities, insurance). Each affiliate maintains separate capital and profits, reducing company-wide risk. extGLBext{GLB}(Gramm-Leach-Bliley) framework.
  • Economies of scale: Cost advantages with increased output; average cost per unit falls as scale rises.
  • Economies of scope: Cost advantages from producing multiple products/services jointly rather than separately.
  • Expense-preference behavior: Managerial objective that emphasizes personal benefits over cost efficiency.
  • Agency theory: Relationship between owners and managers; governance mechanisms to align interests and reduce agency costs.
  • Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act (1994): Allowed interstate acquisitions and nationwide branching for holding companies, expanding geographic reach.
  • Branch banking: Growth of branch networks (home office + branches) to provide services in multiple locations; balance between centralized control and local decision-making.
  • Electronic banking: Online and electronic channels (web banking, ATMs, POS, call centers) that can supplement or replace some traditional branches.
  • Convergence: Tendency for different financial firms to offer similar service menus, increasing competition and cross-sector similarities.

Connections to broader themes

  • Fleet of organizational forms reflects a balance between risk management, capital access, and market reach.
  • Regulatory changes (Riegle-Neal, GLB) have a direct impact on structure, competition, and efficiency in the industry.
  • The debate on efficiency versus competition continues, with evidence of economies of scale and mixed evidence for economies of scope.
  • Corporate governance and ownership structures (agency theory) influence cost control, profitability, and resilience during economic cycles.

Real-world relevance

  • Interstate expansion and GLB-driven diversification have shaped the modern landscape, enabling large, diversified financial conglomerates with global footprints.
  • Community banks face regulatory pressures and competitive challenges as the market consolidates and scales up through branching and holding-company structures.
  • Technological shifts (electronic branching) change how customers access services, potentially reducing the need for dense physical branch networks in the future.