curriculum history

Historical Context of Curriculum Design

  • Edmund C. Short provides a historical perspective on curriculum design.

  • Virgil E. Herrick (1950, 1965) emphasized curriculum design as:

    • A structure defining components and relationships within the curriculum.

    • A means to select, organize, and clarify roles in learning experiences.

    • Identified dimensions of curriculum development beyond mere coherence.

Key Figures and Concepts

  • Herrick's view led to identifying referents like knowledge, society, and the individual in curriculum design.

  • Goodlad summarized this tradition, exploring curriculum design at school, program, and classroom levels (1963).

  • Despite advancements, the discourse around coherence in curriculum design is limited in contemporary discussions.

Confusion in Curriculum Design

  • The concept of curriculum design is often confused (Johnson, 1969; Daniels & Coombs, 1982).

  • A call for more analytical work and innovative designs has been recognized but not thoroughly pursued.

Historical Models of Curriculum Design

  • Persistent Life Situations Design (Stratemeyer et al., 1947):

    • Focuses on categories of life situations emphasizing learning activities over traditional subjects.

    • Engages students in real-life situations to develop democratic skills.

  • Social Problems Criterion (Smith, Stanley, & Shores, 1950):

    • Curriculum should revolve around societal issues and rights, fostering democracy.

    • The curriculum must balance social issues with disciplinary knowledge.

  • Bellack's Curriculum Proposal (1956, 1964):

    • Combines disciplines with interdisciplinary studies, enhancing applicability to human affairs.

  • Core Curriculum (Faunce & Bossing, 1951):

    • Reflects the need for effective communication and collaboration in a democratic society.

    • Combines core subject areas with experiential learning opportunities.

Additional Notable Designs

  • General Curriculum Design (Broudy et al., 1964):

    • Includes symbolic skills, scientific concepts, and social problem seminars.

  • Discipline-Centered Designs (King & Brownell, 1966; Phenix, 1964):

    • Emphasize rigorous study of subjects guided by knowledgeable educators.

  • Process-Oriented Design (Berman, 1968):

    • Focuses on eight human processes, aiming for holistic development beyond academic disciplines.

  • Individualized Curriculum Design (Frymier, 1973, 1977):

    • Tailored to individual needs through a diagnostic-prescriptive model.

Legacy and Evolution of Curriculum Design

  • Historical designs provide valuable perspectives for contemporary curriculum development.

  • Modern approaches often reduce curriculum to measurable outcomes, contrasting the philosophical richness of historical models.

  • Future curriculum should merge historical wisdom with innovative and flexible frameworks, fostering holistic educational goals.