IGCSE Geography Case Studies

Population

  • Over-populated Country: Bangladesh

    • Population: 153153 million

    • Population density: 1062/km21062/km^2

    • Land area: 147,000km2147,000 km^2

    • Natural increase: 1.6%1.6\%

    • Resource-poor country with a lack of natural resources.

    • Population more than doubled since 1971 (from 7575 million), indicating increasing growth rate.

    • High poverty leads to lower living standards, increasing the need for children to contribute to the economy.

    • Four-fifths of the population lives in rural areas.

    • 40%40\% of the population is under-employed.

    • Cyclones and flooding exacerbate the situation due to 80%80\% of the population residing on the floodplains of the Ganges, Brahmaputra, and Meghna rivers, leading to rural-to-urban migration.

    • Dhaka, the capital city, faces increased population pressure for housing, healthcare, water, and sanitation.

    • Population density of Dhaka: 43000/km243000/km^2, among the world's highest.

    • Limited healthcare access: only 11 qualified doctor for every 25,00025,000 village people.

    • Dhaka faces traffic congestion, unemployment, and extreme difficulty in accessing education (e.g., 2020 seats for 20,00020,000 applicants).

    • Bangladesh's land area is relatively small compared to its population, contributing to high density.

    • Population density is 2020 times the global average.

    • Other contributing factors: fertile land, high illiteracy rate, and limited awareness of the cons of a larger population.

    • Causes for High Growth Rate

      • High birth rates.
      • High infant mortality rate (IMR): 43/100043/1000 (IMR is the number of deaths of children under one year of age per 1000 live births).
      • Increased poverty, leading to reliance on children for economic contribution.
      • High illiteracy rate of 73.91%73.91 \%.
      • Lack of awareness of contraception.
      • Limited emancipation of women.
      • Increased subsistence farming, with 4/54/5 of the population in rural areas.
    • Causes for High Density

      • Land area is relatively less than the population.
      • Fertile region attracting farmers and others to live there.
      • Rural-to-urban migration to Dhaka.
      • Intensive rice production.
  • Under-populated Country: Australia

    • Population: 2222 million
    • Population density: 3/km23/km^2
    • Rate of natural change: 0.7%0.7\%.
    • Infant mortality rate: 4/10004/1000.
    • Land area: 7.77.7 million km2km^2 (6th largest in the world).
    • Fertility rate: 1.81.8 children per woman.
    • Resource-rich country, exporting raw materials (coal, iron ore, gold, etc.).
    • Vast land area contributes to low population density.
    • Uneven population distribution with most people living on fertile coastlines.
    • Positive net migration leading to a good quality of life.
    • Causes of Underpopulation
      • Developed infrastructure and improved health and education.
      • Improved healthcare.
      • Availability and affordability of contraception.
      • Low fertility rates.
      • Highly skilled workers are paid high wages, thus, less reliance on children.
      • Emancipation of women.
    • Problems of Underpopulation
      • Shortage of workers.
      • Inability to exploit all resources.
      • Fewer taxpayers, reducing government revenue.
      • Potential closure of schools and hospitals.
      • Reduced brainpower leading to less innovation and economic development.
      • Potential closure of public transport links.
      • Increased dependency ratio.
  • Country with Low Population Growth/Decline: Russia

    • In 2012, birth rate was 13/100013/1000, death rate was 14/100014/1000, resulting in a natural change of 0.1%-0.1\%.

    • In 2017, birth rate was 11/100011/1000, death rate was 13.5/100013.5/1000, resulting in a natural change of 0.25%-0.25\%.

    • 2018 growth rate: 0.02%-0.02\%.

    • Peak population (1991): 148.7148.7 million; 2012 population: 143143 million.

    • Population density: approximately 8.4km28.4 km^2, one of the most sparsely populated countries.

    • Table 6: Russia’s Population, 1991-2050 (in millions)

      • 1991: 148.7148.7
      • 2012: 143.2143.2
      • 2017: 143.98143.98
      • 2018: 143.96143.96
      • 2025 (estimate): 140.8140.8
      • 2050 (estimate): 127.8127.8
    • Reasons for Population Decline/Slow Growth

      • Low birth rates.
      • High death rates, particularly among men.
      • Emigration.
    • Transition from a communist centrally planned economy to a market economy has increased inequality, unemployment, and poverty.

    • High perceived cost of raising children when both parents need to work.

    • High education standards for women, giving them a decisive say in family size decisions.

    • High contraception use: 80%80\% of married women aged 15-49 use contraception.

    • High adult literacy rate: 99.7%99.7\% in 2015.

    • Significant difference in life expectancy between men and women.

      • 2012: Women - 7575 years, Men - 6363 years.
      • 2017: Women - 77.6477.64 years, Men - 67.5167.51 years.
    • Low male life expectancy attributed to high alcohol intake, smoking, pollution, poverty, HIV/AIDS, and other diseases.

    • High male death rate results in 10.710.7 million more women than men.

    • Greatest population decline in rural areas with 85008500 villages abandoned since 2002.

    • Sociological survey (June 2011): one-fifth of the Russian population are potential emigrants!

    • 2017 net migration rate: 1.71.7 migrant(s)/1,000 population.

    • Government efforts to boost birth rates include honoring families with four or more children with a Parental Glory medal.

    • Government has allocated 2.4billiontoprovideRussianwomenanallowanceof2.4 billion to provide Russian women an allowance of180for18monthsafterthebirthoftheirfirstchild.</p></li><li><p>Russialostfor 18 months after the birth of their first child.</p></li> <li><p>Russia lost106,200peoplebetweenJanuaryandOctober2017.</p></li><li><p>Massemigrationwavesincreasing,leadingtoapotentialbraindrain.</p></li><li><p>350,000peopleemigratedfromRussiain2015(10timesmorethanfiveyearsago).</p></li></ul></li><li><p><strong>InternationalMigration:MexicotoUSA</strong></p><ul><li>Since1965,overpeople between January and October 2017.</p></li> <li><p>Mass emigration waves increasing, leading to a potential brain drain.</p></li> <li><p>350,000 people emigrated from Russia in 2015 (10 times more than five years ago).</p></li></ul></li> <li><p><strong>International Migration: Mexico to USA</strong></p> <ul> <li>Since 1965, over16millionMexicanshavemigratedtotheUSA.</li><li>Approximatelymillion Mexicans have migrated to the USA.</li> <li>Approximately6,650,000illegalimmigrantshavecrossedthe2000kmborder,withoverillegal immigrants have crossed the 2000 km border, with over6000deathsduringcrossings.</li><li>Annualmigrationrate:deaths during crossings.</li> <li>Annual migration rate:1millionMexicanstotheUSA.</li><li><strong>PushFactors(Mexico)</strong><ul><li>Highcrimerates:million Mexicans to the USA.</li> <li><strong>Push Factors (Mexico)</strong><ul> <li>High crime rates:47,500crimerelateddeathsinthepast5years.</li><li>Poormedicalfacilities:crime-related deaths in the past 5 years.</li> <li>Poor medical facilities:1800peopleperdoctor.</li><li>Lowpaidjobs:GNPpeople per doctor.</li> <li>Low-paid jobs: GNP -3750.</li><li>Lowliteracyrate:.</li> <li>Low literacy rate:55\%.</li><li>Climateandnaturaldisasters.</li><li>Governmentcorruption.</li><li>Unemploymentandpoverty(estimated.</li> <li>Climate and natural disasters.</li> <li>Government corruption.</li> <li>Unemployment and poverty (estimated40\%).</li><li>Despitebeingthe11thrichestcountry,ithasthe10thhighestpovertyrate:).</li> <li>Despite being the 11th richest country, it has the 10th highest poverty rate:44.2\%.</li></ul></li><li><strong>PullFactors(USA)</strong><ul><li>Betterqualityoflifeandimprovedinfrastructure.</li><li>Lowerriskfromnaturaldisasters.</li><li>Excellentmedicalfacilities:.</li></ul></li> <li><strong>Pull Factors (USA)</strong><ul> <li>Better quality of life and improved infrastructure.</li> <li>Lower risk from natural disasters.</li> <li>Excellent medical facilities:400peopleperdoctor.</li><li>Wellpaidjobs:GNPpeople per doctor.</li> <li>Well-paid jobs: GNP -24,750.</li><li>Literacyrate:.</li> <li>Literacy rate:99\%.</li><li>Lowercrimeratesandbetterpolicing.</li><li>Schoolleavingage:16vs.14inMexico.</li></ul></li><li><strong>ImpactonMexico</strong><ul><li>Shortageofeconomicallyactivepeople.</li><li>Foodshortages.</li><li>Increaseddependentpopulationduetoyouthmigration.</li><li>Legalandillegalimmigrantssendaround.</li> <li>Lower crime rates and better policing.</li> <li>School leaving age: 16 vs. 14 in Mexico.</li></ul></li> <li><strong>Impact on Mexico</strong><ul> <li>Shortage of economically active people.</li> <li>Food shortages.</li> <li>Increased dependent population due to youth migration.</li> <li>Legal and illegal immigrants send around6billionayeartoMexico.</li><li>Genderinequality(hardforwomentofindpartners)leadingtodecreasedbirthratesandincreaseddependencyratio.</li><li>Reducedpressureonland,socialservices,andjobs.</li></ul></li><li><strong>ImpactonUSA</strong><ul><li>Illegalmigrationcostsmillionsinborderpatrolandprisonexpenses.</li><li>Improvedculture.</li><li>Drugrelatedcrimeproblems.</li><li>SpanishlanguagetaughtinalmostallAmericanstates.</li><li>Top5statesforMexicanimmigrants(2015):California(billion a year to Mexico.</li> <li>Gender inequality (hard for women to find partners) leading to decreased birth rates and increased dependency ratio.</li> <li>Reduced pressure on land, social services, and jobs.</li></ul></li> <li><strong>Impact on USA</strong><ul> <li>Illegal migration costs millions in border patrol and prison expenses.</li> <li>Improved culture.</li> <li>Drug-related crime problems.</li> <li>Spanish language taught in almost all American states.</li> <li>Top 5 states for Mexican immigrants (2015): California (37\%,Texas(, Texas (22\%,Illinois(, Illinois (6\%,andFlorida(, and Florida (2\%.)</li></ul></li></ul></li><li><p><strong>CountrywithHighDependentPopulation:Japan</strong></p><ul><li>MEDCwithapopulationof.)</li></ul></li></ul></li> <li><p><strong>Country with High Dependent Population: Japan</strong></p> <ul> <li>MEDC with a population of128million(10thlargestglobally).</li><li>Largestpopulationofpeopleover65years:million (10th largest globally).</li> <li>Largest population of people over 65 years:1/5ofthepopulationisover65(of the population is over 65 (19.7\%oror25.2million).</li><li>Higherthanothercountries:Italy(million).</li> <li>Higher than other countries: Italy (19.6\%,Germany(, Germany (18.6\%,andFrance(, and France (16.3\%.)</li><li>Totalfertilityrate:.)</li> <li>Total fertility rate:1.25.</li><li>Averagelifeexpectancy:.</li> <li>Average life expectancy:84</li><li><strong>MainCausesofHighDependentPopulation</strong><ul><li>Highlifeexpectancyduetoimprovedmedicalcare,advancementsintechnology,healthylifestyles,andgoodsanitation(males:</li> <li><strong>Main Causes of High Dependent Population</strong><ul> <li>High life expectancy due to improved medical care, advancements in technology, healthy lifestyles, and good sanitation (males:82,females:, females:89).</li><li>Lowfertilityratesduetolatermarriages,highereducation,emancipationofwomen,andhighercostofraisingachild.Percentageofwomennevermarriedincreasedfrom).</li> <li>Low fertility rates due to later marriages, higher education, emancipation of women, and higher cost of raising a child. Percentage of women never married increased from22\%toto30\%.</li></ul></li><li><strong>OtherCauses</strong><ul><li>Declinedinfantmortalityrate.</li><li>Lackofchildcarefacilities.</li><li>Expensivepregnancycosts.</li><li>Lowchildbenefitpaymentsfromthegovernment.</li></ul></li><li><strong>ImpactsofAgingPopulation</strong><ul><li>Governmentraisedtheretirementagefrom60to65.</li><li>Lackofhealthcarestafftolookaftertheelderly.</li><li>Costlypensions.</li><li>Workforceisexpectedtofall.</li></ul></li> <li><strong>Other Causes</strong><ul> <li>Declined infant mortality rate.</li> <li>Lack of childcare facilities.</li> <li>Expensive pregnancy costs.</li> <li>Low child benefit payments from the government.</li></ul></li> <li><strong>Impacts of Aging Population</strong><ul> <li>Government raised the retirement age from 60 to 65.</li> <li>Lack of healthcare staff to look after the elderly.</li> <li>Costly pensions.</li> <li>Workforce is expected to fall15\%overthenext20yearsandhalveinthenext50years.</li><li>Shrinkingworkforcerate:over the next 20 years and halve in the next 50 years.</li> <li>Shrinking workforce rate:1\%peryear.</li><li>Increasesinthedependencyratio(old).</li><li>Lessinnovationamongolderpopulationresultinginalesseducatedworkforceandlowereconomicdevelopment.</li><li>Requirementofhightaxratestogaintaxrevenue.</li><li>Needforimmigrationofeconomicallyactivepeopletoreduceagingpopulationandincreaseeconomicgrowth.</li></ul></li></ul></li><li><p><strong>SparselyPopulatedCountry:TheCanadianNorthlands</strong></p><ul><li><p>Location:NorthAmericabeyondper year.</li> <li>Increases in the dependency ratio (old).</li> <li>Less innovation among older population resulting in a less educated workforce and lower economic development.</li> <li>Requirement of high tax rates to gain tax revenue.</li> <li>Need for immigration of economically active people to reduce aging population and increase economic growth.</li></ul></li></ul></li> <li><p><strong>Sparsely Populated Country: The Canadian Northlands</strong></p> <ul> <li><p>Location: North America beyond55degreesnorth.</p></li><li><p>Largestsettlement:YellowknifeintheNorthwestTerritories(populationdegrees north.</p></li> <li><p>Largest settlement: Yellowknife in the Northwest Territories (population19,000).</p></li><li><p>Populationdensity:lessthan).</p></li> <li><p>Population density: less than1personpersquarekm.</p></li><li><p><strong>ReasonsforSparsePopulation</strong></p><ul><li><strong>Climate</strong>:Extremelycoldandinhospitableinwinter(meanaverageJanuarytemperaturebeingperson per square km.</p></li> <li><p><strong>Reasons for Sparse Population</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>Climate</strong>: Extremely cold and inhospitable in winter (mean average January temperature being-20degreesC).</li><li><strong>Summers</strong>:Short,limitingagriculture.</li><li><strong>Permafrost</strong>:Groundispermanentlyfrozen,makinglifedifficult,restrictingbuilding,andhinderingcropgrowth.</li><li><strong>Transportandcommunications</strong>:Hamperedbyclimaticconditionswithlimitedrailwayandroadroutes;airtransportisoftentheonlylinktotheoutsideworld.</li></ul></li></ul></li><li><p><strong>AntiNatalistPolicy:ChinasOneChildPolicy</strong></p><ul><li><p>Population(2016):degrees C).</li> <li><strong>Summers</strong>: Short, limiting agriculture.</li> <li><strong>Permafrost</strong>: Ground is permanently frozen, making life difficult, restricting building, and hindering crop growth.</li> <li><strong>Transport and communications</strong>: Hampered by climatic conditions with limited railway and road routes; air transport is often the only link to the outside world.</li></ul></li></ul></li> <li><p><strong>Anti-Natalist Policy: China’s One Child Policy</strong></p> <ul> <li><p>Population (2016):1.3billion.</p></li><li><p>Lifeexpectancy:billion.</p></li> <li><p>Life expectancy:76years.</p></li><li><p>Fertilityratedecreasedfromyears.</p></li> <li><p>Fertility rate decreased from5.7births/womanin1970tobirths/woman in 1970 to1.57births/womanin2015.</p></li><li><p>Since1970,birthratesreducedbybirths/woman in 2015.</p></li> <li><p>Since 1970, birth rates reduced by400million.</p></li><li><p><strong>Background</strong></p><ul><li>PostWWII,Chinaneededahigherpopulationtostrengthenitsarmy,resultinginrapidpopulationgrowth.</li><li>1970s:governmentrealizedthecountrywouldfacefamineunlessdrasticchangesweremade.</li></ul></li><li><p><strong>PolicyImplementation(1979)</strong></p><ul><li>Restrictedfamilysizetoonechild.</li><li>Increasedmarriageableage(men22,women20).</li><li>Citizenshadtoapplytothegovernmenttomarry.</li><li>Incentivesforcompliance:freeeducation,healthcare,housing,andjobs.</li><li>Penaltiesfornoncompliance:nobenefits,fines,andrequiredabortions.</li><li>Salaryriseofmillion.</p></li> <li><p><strong>Background</strong></p> <ul> <li>Post-WWII, China needed a higher population to strengthen its army, resulting in rapid population growth.</li> <li>1970s: government realized the country would face famine unless drastic changes were made.</li></ul></li> <li><p><strong>Policy Implementation (1979)</strong></p> <ul> <li>Restricted family size to one child.</li> <li>Increased marriageable age (men-22, women-20).</li> <li>Citizens had to apply to the government to marry.</li> <li>Incentives for compliance: free education, healthcare, housing, and jobs.</li> <li>Penalties for non-compliance: no benefits, fines, and required abortions.</li> <li>Salary rise of5-10\%forlimitingfamilytoonechild.</li><li>In2007,for limiting family to one child.</li> <li>In 2007,39\%ofthepopulationwassubjecttostrictonechildrestriction.</li></ul></li><li><p><strong>EffectsofthePolicy</strong></p><ul><li>Femaleinfanticide(preferenceformales).</li><li>Birthratesfallenfromof the population was subject to strict one-child restriction.</li></ul></li> <li><p><strong>Effects of the Policy</strong></p> <ul> <li>Female infanticide (preference for males).</li> <li>Birth rates fallen from44toto12.</li><li>Populationgrowthratedecreasedbymorethan.</li> <li>Population growth rate decreased by more than10\%sinceimplementation.</li><li>Estimated400millionfewerpeoplehavebeenborn.</li><li>Newindustrieshaveliftedmillionsoutofpoverty.</li><li>Dependencyratiodecreased.</li><li>Workingagepopulationdecreased(longterm).</li><li>LittleEmperorsyndrome:onlychildrenwereoftenspoiled.</li><li>Genderimbalance:morethan30millionmoreyoungmenthanyoungwomen.</li></ul></li><li><p><strong>ExceptionstothePolicy</strong></p><ul><li>Ifthefirstchildwasdisabled,asecondchildwasallowed.</li><li>Twinsortriplets.</li><li>Familiesinruralareaswereallowedasecondchild.</li><li>Ethnicgroupswereexempt.</li><li>Coupleswhobribedofficials.</li></ul></li></ul></li><li><p><strong>ProNatalistPolicy:France</strong></p><ul><li>Population(2015):since implementation.</li> <li>Estimated 400 million fewer people have been born.</li> <li>New industries have lifted millions out of poverty.</li> <li>Dependency ratio decreased.</li> <li>Working age population decreased (long term).</li> <li>'Little Emperor' syndrome: only children were often spoiled.</li> <li>Gender imbalance: more than 30 million more young men than young women.</li></ul></li> <li><p><strong>Exceptions to the Policy</strong></p> <ul> <li>If the first child was disabled, a second child was allowed.</li> <li>Twins or triplets.</li> <li>Families in rural areas were allowed a second child.</li> <li>Ethnic groups were exempt.</li> <li>Couples who bribed officials.</li></ul></li></ul></li> <li><p><strong>Pro-Natalist Policy: France</strong></p> <ul> <li>Population (2015):67million</li><li>Fertilitylevel:million</li> <li>Fertility level:1.67childrenperwomanin1992,increasedtochildren per woman in 1992, increased to2.0$$ in 2015 (close to replacement rate of 2.1)

    • Concerns with low population/fertility levels:
      • Decrease in labor supply
      • Long term prospect of population decline
    • Reasons for reduced fertility levels:
      • Education
      • Women in careers
      • Later marriages
      • State benefits
    • **