Demography and Extinction
Persistence of populations
importance of genetics in population persistence controversial, critics said
inbreeding unlikely to affect fitness in the wild
inbreeding may affect individual fitness but not population viability
demographic effects more important
hard to separate genetic and environmental factors when assessing population viability
inbreeding depression initially causes subtle reductions in birth and death rates that interact with other factors
obvious indications of inbreeding depression aren’t detectable until severe
extinction a demographic process influenced by genetic effects under some circumstances: need to identify when genetic concerns will affect population persistence
Inbreeding depression and extinction
when is inbreeding likely to affect population viability
have to have inbreeding
inbreeding depression must occur
traits affected by inbreeding depression must reduce population viability
when will inbreeding depression affect pop viabilty and how important will that effect be?
usually true in small pops
What is a viable population? Demographic criteria
IUCN most generally accepted demographic criteria
incorporate short term urgency and long-term concerns
considers generation time
shorter time periods recommended b/c errors in models are propagated in longer time periods
Genetic criteria
Soule et al. 1986
captive breeding programs
90% of H over 200 years
Long-term persistence: adaptation to change
target pop sizes should be 1,000-5,000 individuals to balance loss of variation with new variation due to mutation
Population viability analysis (PVA)
models to assess whether pops are likely to persist
used to identify spp of concern, set prioritiesm develop recovery plans
includes chance events (stochasticity) in demography, env, natural catastrophes, and genetics
includes synergistic interactions btwn demographic events and genetic effects
vortex simulation model created by Bob Lacy
free
powerfull
easy to use
widespread
need info on many factors
identify threats and management actions to reduce threats and increase prob of persistence
sensitivity testing
try a range of values for uncertain parameters to determine how they might affect the results
which aspects contribute most to vulnerability? target these for management
If uncertain parameters are important, focus research
Inbreeding depression isnt the only way that loss of genetic variation affects population viability
separate mating types
50% of plants have genetic incompatibility mechanisms
self-incompatibility locus (S)
pollen grains can only fertilize plants that do not have the same S allele
homozygotes cannot be produced at this locus
smaller pops have fewer S alleles than larger pops
reducing the number of S alleles reduces the freq of compatible matings
Haplodiploid species
sex determined by genotype at one or more loci, commonly one locus with 10-20 alleles
ants, bees, wasps, thrips, whitefly and others
at sex determining loci:
heterozygotes = female
haploids and homozygous diploid = male
loss of allelic variation caused by bottlenecks or drift increases homozygosity at sex determining loci and increases the number of males
diploid males sterile
fewer females
reduced foraging productivity
reduced pop size
skewed sex ratio and reduced Ne
Loss of evolutionary potential
reduces ability to respond to future changes (which will occur eventually)
Depends on heterozygosity and number of alleles
E.g. Mhc and disease resistance
mtDNA
mutations in mtDNA may affect fitness
sperm are powered by mitochondria, reductions in power output reduces male fertility
pop viability reduced by mtDNA haplotypes that lower fitness
Ne for mtDNA about 1/4Ne for nuclear genes
more sensitive to drift and bottlenecks
increase in haplotypes that reduce male fertility
reduce number of progeny
increase variability in male reproductive success and therefore reduce Ne
Mutational meltdown
small pops accumulate deleterious mutations b/c natural selection is overpowered by drift
pop has decreased fitness and becomes smaller
rate that deleterious mutations accumulate accelerates
feedback process
could substantially decrease long-term viability over the course of 100s/1000s of gens