Chapter 1: Introduction to limited government and classical theory
1. Limited Government vs. Classical theory
Limited Government and Natural Rights
Based on Enlightenment principles, this theory asserts that individuals possess inherent natural rights such as life, liberty, and property in a "state of nature."
Social Contract: A foundational agreement where individuals voluntarily surrender certain freedoms to a governing body in exchange for the protection of their remaining rights and general security.
Right to Revolution: If a government fails to protect these rights or violates the social contract, the people retain the moral authority to overthrow and replace it.
Classical Theory and the British System
Classical theory views individuals as social beings for whom government is a natural, organic development rather than a calculated contract.
The British "Mixed" Regime: Designed to combine three forms of rule to prevent any one from becoming corrupt:
Monarchy: Provides unity and efficiency but can devolve into tyranny.
Aristocracy: Intended to utilize wise rulers but risks turning into an oppressive oligarchy.
Democracy: Represents the interests of the many but risks leading to "mob rule" or instability.
Colonists initially admired this balance until the $1770$s, when they began to see the British system as fundamentally flawed.
2. The American Revolution and the pamphlet war
Representation Debates
Virtual Representation: The British argued that the colonists were represented by Parliament because its members acted in the interest of the whole empire, regardless of who voted.
Geographic Representation: The colonists contended that they could only be taxed by representatives they specifically elected within their own colonies.
Though fighting began in April $1775$ after the Battles of Lexington and Concord, many remained loyal to the King, hoping for a peaceful resolution.
Role of the Pamphlet War
Pamphlets were the primary medium for political debate, being inexpensive and widely accessible.
Often published anonymously to avoid sedition charges, they were crucial in shifting public opinion from seeking reconciliation to demanding total independence.
3. Common Sense
Impact of Thomas Paine
Published in January $1776$, "Common Sense" used direct, accessible language—avoiding complex legal Latin—to explain the necessity of revolution.
It successfully framed the conflict not just as a legal tax dispute, but as a struggle for universal human liberty.
Public Reception
The pamphlet sold approximately $120,000$ to $150,000$ copies in just $3$ months, a massive reach relative to the $18^{th}$ century population.
It provided a moral and rational justification for separation that persuaded common citizens and political leaders alike.
4. Paine’s model of government
Critique of the British Constitution
Paine argued that "government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil," necessitated by the lack of moral virtue in human nature.
He attacked the British Constitution for being overly complex, arguing its complexity served only to shield the government from accountability.
A New Democratic Vision
Paine advocated for a direct democracy for small groups, which would transition into a larger representative government as society grew.
Frequent Elections: He stressed that for a government to be truly representative, elections must occur frequently to ensure that the representatives' interests remains the same as the people's.
Equality of Man: He explicitly challenged the hereditary principle of monarchy, declaring that the distinction of "kings and subjects" was artificial