6. Erikson
Theories of Personality
Overview of Post-Freudian Theory
Aim: Extend Freud’s Assumptions
Focus on:
Infantile Development
Life-Cycle Approach to Personality
Social and Historical Influences
Stages characterized by psychosocial struggles
Example: Identity crisis
Biography of Erik Erikson
Birth: Frankfurt, Germany in 1902
Family Background: Son of Jewish mother; unknown father
Childhood: Experienced rejection from both Jewish and Gentile communities
Youth: Left home at 18; lived as an itinerant artist in Europe for 7 years
Psychoanalysis Introduction: In Vienna, introduced to psychoanalysis by Anna Freud
Education: Graduated from the Vienna Psychoanalytic Institute
Career:
1933: Research position at Harvard Medical School
1950: Published Childhood and Society
Taught at Yale, Berkeley, and others
Position: Professor of Human Development at Harvard (1960)
Death: Died in Cape Cod in 1994
The Ego in Post-Freudian Theory
Ego Psychology Description
Three Interrelated Aspects of the Ego:
Body Ego: An individual's perception and feelings about their physical body, which influence their sense of self.
Ego Ideal: Represents the standards and aspirations that a person strives to achieve, reflecting their values and personal goals.
Ego Identity: Refers to how an individual defines themselves in relation to their social and personal experiences, shaping their overall sense of identity.
Society’s Influence:
Ego largely shaped by culture
Epigenetic Principle: Ego grows sequentially, changes arise at specific times
Stages of Psychosocial Development
Basic Points:
Follows epigenetic principle
Every stage involves interaction of opposites
Conflict produces ego strength
Consequences:
Too little strength results in core psychopathology later
Stages characterized as biological
Personality development involves identity crisis from adolescence
Trust vs Mistrust (Birth to 18 months)
Mode: Oral-Sensory
Modes of Incorporation: Receiving and Accepting
Development of Trust:
Influenced by caregiver quality
Responsive, caring caregiver secure trust
Neglectful caregiver insecure mistrust
Outcomes:
If trust predominates: Hope
If mistrust predominates: Withdrawal
Autonomy vs Shame & Doubt (18 months to 3 years)
Stage: Early Childhood, Anal-Urethral-Muscular
Focus: Independence
Toilet training
Freedom to express preferences
Outcomes:
Empowered parents lead to confident children: Will
Overprotective parents result in lack of confidence: Compulsion
Initiative vs Guilt (3 - 6 years)
Stage: Play Age, Genital-Locomotor Mode
Focus: Regulation between desire to act and need for approval
Outcomes:
Successful individuals gain Purpose
Those restricted develop Inhibition
Industry vs Inferiority (6 to 11/12 years)
Stage: School Age, Latency
Focus: Building self-esteem through skill acquisition
Outcomes:
Successful resolution leads to Competence
Too little support results in inertia, low self-esteem
Too much support leads to over-industriousness (overly eager approach to work or productivity)
Identity vs Identity Confusion (11/12 to 20 years)
Focus: Adolescents resolving key issues
Choice of occupation
Adoption of values
Development of sexual identity
Outcomes:
Successful resolution leads to Fidelity
Failure can result in Role Repudiation or Defiance
Intimacy vs Isolation (20-40 years)
Focus: Deep personal commitments
Outcomes:
Successful resolution leads to Love
Failure results in Exclusivity and isolation
Generativity vs Stagnation (40-65 years)
Focus: Caring for the next generation
Outcomes:
Resolution leads to Care
Failure results in Rejectivity
Ego Integrity vs Despair (>65 years)
Focus: Reflection on life accomplishments
Outcomes:
Successful resolution results in Wisdom
Failure leads to Disdain
Summary of Stages
Approximate Age | Psychosexual Mode | Psychosocial Crisis | Virtue/Basic Strength | Core Pathology |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Birth to 18 months | Oral-sensory | Trust vs Mistrust | Hope | Withdrawal |
18 months to 3 yo | Anal-urethral-muscular | Autonomy vs Shame & Doubt | Will | Compulsion |
3 to 6 yo | Infantile genital-locomotor | Initiative vs Guilt | Purpose | Inhibition |
6 to 11/12 yo | Latency | Industry vs Inferiority | Competence | Inertia |
11/12 to 20 yo | Puberty | Identity vs Identity Confusion | Fidelity | Role Repudiation |
20-40 yo | Genitality | Intimacy vs Isolation | Love | Exclusivity |
40-65 yo | Procreativity | Generativity vs Stagnation | Care | Rejectivity |
>65 yo | Generalized sensuality | Integrity vs Despair | Wisdom | Disdain |
Erikson’s Method of Investigation
Anthropological Studies: Consistency with strong cultural values
Example: Sioux and Yurok Nations
Psychohistory: Combines psychoanalysis with historical research
Examples: Martin Luther & Gandhi
Related Research
Generativity and Parenting:
Bauer and McAdams (2004)
Peterson (2013)
Sense of generativity important for effective parenting
Generativity vs. Stagnation:
Van Hiel et al. (2013)
Operate independently in adult development
Critique of Erikson
Strengths:
High on generating research and internal consistency
Moderate Performance:
Organizing knowledge, falsifiability, guiding action, parsimony
Concept of Humanity
Key Dualities:
Determinism vs Free Choice
Optimism vs Pessimism
Causality vs Teleology
Developmental Focus:
Consciousness influences life stages
Cultural vs Biological Emphasis:
Highlighting uniqueness over similarity
Reflective Questions
Choose one developmental stage from Erikson’s theory that significantly impacts you today.
As someone entering Young Adulthood, what experiences do you hope to have to build a complete personality? Are there specific challenges as you begin this stage?