Administrative/Copyright Notice Transcript begins with an ANU copyright notice (Section 113P, Copyright Act 1968).
Students are reminded not to reproduce or further communicate the material and not to remove the notice.
Big-Picture Road-Map of Lecture Previous lectures:
• Sequences → Series.
• Started discussing convergence/divergence of series.
Today’s main goals: 1. Show how four “calculus objects” (functions, sequences, series, integrals) inter-relate.
Develop & practise the major convergence tests (integral test, comparison tests, etc.).
(If time) finish a few remaining sequence slides (else to be posted on Canvas).
Four Core Calculus Objects & Their Web of Connections Functions (continuous objects over an interval).
Sequences a < e m > n < / e m > n ∈ N {a<em>n}</em>{n\in\mathbb N} a < e m > n < / e m > n ∈ N (functions whose domain is N \mathbb N N ⇒ discrete version of a function).
Series ∑ a n \sum a_n ∑ a n (sum of a sequence ⇒ discrete analogue of an improper integral).
Integrals
• Definite ∫ < e m > a b f ( x ) d x \int<em>a^b f(x)\,dx ∫ < e m > a b f ( x ) d x • Improper ∫ < / e m > a ∞ f ( x ) d x \int</em>a^{\infty} f(x)\,dx ∫ < / e m > a ∞ f ( x ) d x (limit of definite integrals).
“Discrete vs. Continuous” theme:
• Sequence ↔ Function (discrete sampling).
• Riemann sum ↔ Definite integral (finite discrete approximation).
• Series ↔ Improper integral (infinite discrete approximation).
When Do Discrete & Continuous Agree? Good agreement requires a well-behaved function: smooth, positive, decreasing, bounded derivative, etc.
Cartoon examples:
• Flat, slowly varying f f f ⇒ rectangle sums approximate area well.
• Highly oscillatory f f f (e.g. spikes, zeros at integers) ⇒ sum may badly misrepresent integral.
Integral Test (Key Bridge Between Worlds) Statement Let f : [ 1 , ∞ ) → R f:[1,\infty)\to\mathbb R f : [ 1 , ∞ ) → R be continuous , positive , decreasing .
Set a n = f ( n ) . a_n=f(n). a n = f ( n ) . Then:
∑ < e m > n = 1 ∞ a < / e m > n \displaystyle \sum<em>{n=1}^{\infty} a</em>n ∑ < e m > n = 1 ∞ a < / e m > n converges ⇔ ∫ 1 ∞ f ( x ) d x \displaystyle \int_1^{\infty} f(x)\,dx ∫ 1 ∞ f ( x ) d x converges.
They “share the same fate.”
Why Hypotheses Matter Classic Corollary: p p p -Series Evaluate ∫ 1 ∞ 1 x p d x \displaystyle \int_1^{\infty} \frac{1}{x^{p}}\,dx ∫ 1 ∞ x p 1 d x :
• Convergent if p>1, divergent if p ≤ 1 p\le 1 p ≤ 1 .
Hence ∑ n = 1 ∞ 1 n p \displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac1{n^{p}} n = 1 ∑ ∞ n p 1 has the same behaviour.
Worked Example 1 Determine ∑ n = 2 ∞ 1 n ln n \displaystyle \sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\frac1{n\,\ln n} n = 2 ∑ ∞ n ln n 1 .
Let f ( x ) = 1 x ln x f(x)=\frac1{x\ln x} f ( x ) = x l n x 1 (continuous, positive, decreasing for x ≥ 2 x\ge 2 x ≥ 2 ).
Improper integral:
∫ < e m > 2 ∞ 1 x ln x d x = lim < / e m > t → ∞ ∫ 2 t 1 x ln x d x . \int<em>{2}^{\infty}\frac1{x\ln x}\,dx=\lim</em>{t\to\infty}\int_{2}^{t}\frac1{x\ln x}\,dx. ∫ < e m > 2 ∞ x l n x 1 d x = lim < / e m > t → ∞ ∫ 2 t x l n x 1 d x .
Use u = ln x ⇒ d u = 1 x d x u=\ln x\Rightarrow du=\frac{1}{x}dx u = ln x ⇒ d u = x 1 d x → antiderivative ln ( ln x ) \ln(\ln x) ln ( ln x ) .
Limit diverges to + ∞ +\infty + ∞ ⇒ integral diverges.
Therefore series diverges (by integral test).
“Challenge Problem” Mentioned Invent alternative hypotheses (other than “continuous, positive, decreasing”) that still guarantee the integral test conclusion.
• Suggested idea: f ∈ C 1 , ∣ f ′ ( x ) ∣ ≤ C f ( x ) f\in C^1,\ |f'(x)|\le C\,f(x) f ∈ C 1 , ∣ f ′ ( x ) ∣ ≤ C f ( x ) for large x x x (controls oscillation).
Purely conceptual; not examinable but deepens understanding.
Direct Comparison Test (Series Version) Statement Let 0 ≤ a < e m > n ≤ b < / e m > n 0\le a<em>n\le b</em>n 0 ≤ a < e m > n ≤ b < / e m > n for all large n n n . Then
Practical Tips Real-world sequences rarely satisfy a < e m > n ≤ b < / e m > n a<em>n\le b</em>n a < e m > n ≤ b < / e m > n for every n n n ; acceptable to impose it for n ≥ N n\ge N n ≥ N .
Finite truncations never affect convergence because adding/removing finitely many terms just shifts partial sums by a constant.
Worked Example 2 Test ∑ k = 1 ∞ ln ( k + 10 ) k \displaystyle \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{\ln(k+10)}{k} k = 1 ∑ ∞ k ln ( k + 10 ) .
For k ≥ 1 k\ge1 k ≥ 1 , ln ( k + 10 ) ≥ 1 \ln(k+10)\ge1 ln ( k + 10 ) ≥ 1 ⇒ ln ( k + 10 ) k ≥ 1 k . \frac{\ln(k+10)}{k}\ge\frac1k. k l n ( k + 10 ) ≥ k 1 .
∑ 1 k \sum\frac1k ∑ k 1 diverges (harmonic). By comparison, given bigger series, original also diverges .
Note: shift “+ 10 +10 + 10 ” irrelevant; finite change does not alter convergence.
Concept of Finite Truncation (Formal Justification) Given b < e m > n = a < / e m > n ( n ≥ N ) , b < e m > n = 0 ( n k = 1 n a < / e m > k = T < e m > n + ∑ < / e m > k = 1 N − 1 a k b<em>n=a</em>n\,(n\ge N),\ b<em>n=0\,(n{k=1}^{n}a</em>k=T<em>n+\sum</em>{k=1}^{N-1}ak b < e m > n = a < / e m > n ( n ≥ N ) , b < e m > n = 0 ( n k = 1 n a < / e m > k = T < e m > n + ∑ < / e m > k = 1 N − 1 ak ⇒ S < e m > n S<em>n S < e m > n converges ⇔ T < / e m > n T</em>n T < / e m > n converges.
*\n *### Limit Comparison Test (LCT)
Statement For positive sequences a < e m > n , b < / e m > n a<em>n,b</em>n a < e m > n , b < / e m > n , if
c = lim < e m > n → ∞ a < / e m > n b < e m > n , 0 n \displaystyle c=\lim<em>{n\to\infty}\frac{a</em>n}{b<em>n},\qquad 0n c = lim < e m > n → ∞ b < e m > n a < / e m > n , 0 n and ∑ b ∗ n \sum b*n ∑ b ∗ n either both converge or both diverge.
*\n *#### Heuristic: “Long-term Behaviour Dominates”
Worked Example 3 Test ∑ n = 1 ∞ n + sin n n 2 + 1 . \displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{n+\sin n}{n^{2}+1}. n = 1 ∑ ∞ n 2 + 1 n + sin n .
Dominant terms: numerator ∼ n \sim n ∼ n , denominator ∼ n 2 \sim n^{2} ∼ n 2 ⇒ natural choice b n = n n 2 = 1 n . b_n=\frac{n}{n^{2}}=\frac1n. b n = n 2 n = n 1 .
Compute limit:
a n b n = n + sin n n 2 + 1 ⋅ n = 1 + sin n n 1 + 1 n 2 → n → ∞ 1. \frac{an}{bn}=\frac{n+\sin n}{n^{2}+1}\cdot n=\frac{1+\frac{\sin n}{n}}{1+\frac1{n^{2}}} \xrightarrow{n\to\infty}1. bn an = n 2 + 1 n + s i n n ⋅ n = 1 + n 2 1 1 + n s i n n n → ∞ 1. (Used squeeze theorem: \sin n/n\to0$.)
Since c=1\in(0,\infty)a n d and an d \sum\frac1nd i v e r g e s , o r i g i n a l s e r i e s < / e m > < s t r o n g > < e m > d i v e r g e s < / e m > < / s t r o n g > < e m > b y L C T . < / e m > < / p > < / l i > < / o l > < h 5 i d = " f 15931 c 9 − 3826 − 4338 − 8 c 14 − 59 d 29 d d b d d 0 c " d a t a − t o c − i d = " f 15931 c 9 − 3826 − 4338 − 8 c 14 − 59 d 29 d d b d d 0 c " c o l l a p s e d = " f a l s e " s e o l e v e l m i g r a t e d = " t r u e " > < e m > S t r a t e g y f o r S o l v i n g C o n v e r g e n c e P r o b l e m s < / e m > < / h 5 > < o l > < l i > < p > < s t r o n g > < e m > D i v e r g e n c e T e s t f i r s t < / e m > < / s t r o n g > < e m > ( d o e s diverges, original series </em><strong><em>diverges</em></strong><em> by LCT.</em></p></li></ol><h5 id="f15931c9-3826-4338-8c14-59d29ddbdd0c" data-toc-id="f15931c9-3826-4338-8c14-59d29ddbdd0c" collapsed="false" seolevelmigrated="true"><em>Strategy for Solving Convergence Problems</em></h5><ol><li><p><strong><em>Divergence Test first</em></strong><em> (does d i v er g es , or i g ina l ser i es < / e m >< s t ro n g >< e m > d i v er g es < / e m >< / s t ro n g >< e m > b y L CT . < / e m >< / p >< / l i >< / o l >< h 5 i d = " f 15931 c 9 − 3826 − 4338 − 8 c 14 − 59 d 29 dd b dd 0 c " d a t a − t oc − i d = " f 15931 c 9 − 3826 − 4338 − 8 c 14 − 59 d 29 dd b dd 0 c " co ll a p se d = " f a l se " seo l e v e l mi g r a t e d = " t r u e " >< e m > St r a t e g y f or S o l v in g C o n v er g e n ce P ro b l e m s < / e m >< / h 5 >< o l >< l i >< p >< s t ro n g >< e m > D i v er g e n ce T es t f i rs t < / e m >< / s t ro n g >< e m > ( d oes a_n\not\to0? ) . < / e m > < / p > < / l i > < l i > < p > < e m > I d e n t i f y d o m i n a n t b e h a v i o u r : a l g e b r a i c ( ?).</em></p></li><li><p><em>Identify dominant behaviour: algebraic ( ?) . < / e m >< / p >< / l i >< l i >< p >< e m > I d e n t i f y d o minan t b e ha v i o u r : a l g e b r ai c ( n^p) , l o g a r i t h m i c , e x p o n e n t i a l , t r i g . < / e m > < / p > < / l i > < l i > < p > < e m > C h o o s e b e t w e e n : < b r > < / e m > < / p > < p > < e m > • I n t e g r a l t e s t ( n i c e a n t i d e r i v a t i v e ) . < b r > < / e m > < / p > < p > < e m > • D i r e c t c o m p a r i s o n ( i n e q u a l i t y o b v i o u s ) . < b r > < / e m > < / p > < p > < e m > • L i m i t c o m p a r i s o n ( r a t i o s e a s i e s t ) . < b r > < / e m > < / p > < p > < e m > • O t h e r t e s t s ( r a t i o , r o o t , a l t e r n a t i n g ) t o b e s t u d i e d l a t e r . < / e m > < / p > < / l i > < l i > < p > < e m > D o n ’ t f o r g e t f i n i t e t r u n c a t i o n s a n d c o m b i n i n g m u l t i p l e t e s t s p i e c e − w i s e . < / e m > < / p > < / l i > < / o l > < h 5 i d = " 04 c 30 f 28 − d e 7 d − 42 a f − 9 b 37 − 1 f 1 a 007 d 9 f b d " d a t a − t o c − i d = " 04 c 30 f 28 − d e 7 d − 42 a f − 9 b 37 − 1 f 1 a 007 d 9 f b d " c o l l a p s e d = " f a l s e " s e o l e v e l m i g r a t e d = " t r u e " > < e m > S e r i e s o f F u n c t i o n s ( P r e v i e w / M o t i v a t i o n ) < / e m > < / h 5 > < u l > < l i > < p > < e m > O f t e n n e e d t o a p p r o x i m a t e c o m p l i c a t e d ), logarithmic, exponential, trig.</em></p></li><li><p><em>Choose between: <br></em></p><p><em>• Integral test (nice antiderivative). <br></em></p><p><em>• Direct comparison (inequality obvious). <br></em></p><p><em>• Limit comparison (ratios easiest). <br></em></p><p><em>• Other tests (ratio, root, alternating) to be studied later.</em></p></li><li><p><em>Don’t forget finite truncations and combining multiple tests piece-wise.</em></p></li></ol><h5 id="04c30f28-de7d-42af-9b37-1f1a007d9fbd" data-toc-id="04c30f28-de7d-42af-9b37-1f1a007d9fbd" collapsed="false" seolevelmigrated="true"><em>Series of Functions (Preview / Motivation)</em></h5><ul><li><p><em>Often need to approximate complicated ) , l o g a r i t hmi c , e x p o n e n t ia l , t r i g . < / e m >< / p >< / l i >< l i >< p >< e m > C h oose b e tw ee n :< b r >< / e m >< / p >< p >< e m > • I n t e g r a lt es t ( ni ce an t i d er i v a t i v e ) . < b r >< / e m >< / p >< p >< e m > • D i rec t co m p a r i so n ( in e q u a l i t yo b v i o u s ) . < b r >< / e m >< / p >< p >< e m > • L imi t co m p a r i so n ( r a t i ose a s i es t ) . < b r >< / e m >< / p >< p >< e m > • Ot h er t es t s ( r a t i o , roo t , a lt er na t in g ) t o b es t u d i e d l a t er . < / e m >< / p >< / l i >< l i >< p >< e m > Do n ’ t f or g e t f ini t e t r u n c a t i o n s an d co mbinin g m u lt i pl e t es t s p i ece − w i se . < / e m >< / p >< / l i >< / o l >< h 5 i d = "04 c 30 f 28 − d e 7 d − 42 a f − 9 b 37 − 1 f 1 a 007 d 9 f b d " d a t a − t oc − i d = "04 c 30 f 28 − d e 7 d − 42 a f − 9 b 37 − 1 f 1 a 007 d 9 f b d " co ll a p se d = " f a l se " seo l e v e l mi g r a t e d = " t r u e " >< e m > S er i eso f F u n c t i o n s ( P re v i e w / M o t i v a t i o n ) < / e m >< / h 5 >< u l >< l i >< p >< e m > O f t e nn ee d t o a pp ro x ima t eco m pl i c a t e d f(x)b y < / e m > < s t r o n g > < e m > i n f i n i t e s u m s o f s i m p l e r f u n c t i o n s < / e m > < / s t r o n g > < e m > . E x a m p l e s : < b r > < / e m > < / p > < p > < e m > • < / e m > < s t r o n g > < e m > T a y l o r s e r i e s < / e m > < / s t r o n g > < e m > : by </em><strong><em>infinite sums of simpler functions</em></strong><em>. Examples: <br></em></p><p><em>• </em><strong><em>Taylor series</em></strong><em>: b y < / e m >< s t ro n g >< e m > in f ini t es u m so f s im pl er f u n c t i o n s < / e m >< / s t ro n g >< e m > . E x am pl es :< b r >< / e m >< / p >< p >< e m > • < / e m >< s t ro n g >< e m > T a y l orser i es < / e m >< / s t ro n g >< e m >: f(x)=\sum{n=0}^{\infty}cn x^{n}\;\Rightarrow\; f = \lim{N\to\infty} PN(x)( p o l y n o m i a l a p p r o x i m a t i o n ) . < b r > < / e m > < / p > < p > < e m > • < / e m > < s t r o n g > < e m > F o u r i e r s e r i e s < / e m > < / s t r o n g > < e m > : s u m s o f s i n e s / c o s i n e s f o r s i g n a l a n a l y s i s . < / e m > < / p > < / l i > < l i > < p > < e m > B e n e f i t s : p o l y n o m i a l s / t r i g f u n c t i o n s a r e e a s y t o d i f f e r e n t i a t e , i n t e g r a t e , a n d a n a l y s e ; p a r t i a l s u m d e g r e e (polynomial approximation). <br></em></p><p><em>• </em><strong><em>Fourier series</em></strong><em>: sums of sines/cosines for signal analysis.</em></p></li><li><p><em>Benefits: polynomials/trig functions are easy to differentiate, integrate, and analyse; partial sum degree ( p o l y n o mia l a pp ro x ima t i o n ) . < b r >< / e m >< / p >< p >< e m > • < / e m >< s t ro n g >< e m > F o u r i erser i es < / e m >< / s t ro n g >< e m >: s u m so f s in es / cos in es f ors i g na l ana l ys i s . < / e m >< / p >< / l i >< l i >< p >< e m > B e n e f i t s : p o l y n o mia l s / t r i g f u n c t i o n s a ree a sy t o d i ff ere n t ia t e , in t e g r a t e , an d ana l yse ; p a r t ia l s u m d e g ree N$$ quantifies approximation complexity.
Miscellaneous Remarks & Practical Advice Integral test fails for oscillatory or sign-changing functions; ensure positivity and monotonicity.
Repeated practice is essential; convergence testing is “an art.”
When stuck, analyse long-term form, strip lower-order terms, and search for a familiar