Film Theory Realism and Film (Part 2)
Realism and Film (Part 2)
Historical Context
Historical cinematic movements often aim to reproduce their immediate social contexts.
The term ‘real’ in film implies a focus on conditions further down the social scale.
Key Realist Film Movements
Two key realist movements:
Italian Neorealism
Emerged from the aftermath of WWII.
Themes include post-war deprivation, morality, authority, economic struggles, and social mobility.
British Social Realism
Developed during the late 1950s and 1960s in the UK.
Italian Neorealism
Defined by filmmakers' intent:
David Overby quotes, “To confront audiences with their own reality and analyze that reality.”
Characteristics:
Loose narratives
Use of non-professional actors
Location shooting
Open-ended conclusions
Roberto Rossellini emphasized a moral perspective in filmmaking, evolving into an aesthetic viewpoint.
British Social Realism
Emerged from theatrical and literary roots.
In 1956, Lindsay Anderson emphasized the importance of depicting “the significance of the everyday.”
Focus on young male protagonists known as ‘Angry Young Men’ who articulated social disaffection against post-war Britain’s inequities.
Fewer representations of female experiences, though films like A Taste of Honey existed.
Influenced by the cultural shifts of the 1960s, with iconic bands like The Beatles and The Rolling Stones shaping societal contexts.
Visual Style and Techniques
Characterized by:
Location shooting, especially in Midlands or Northern settings.
Use of black and white photography to enhance authenticity.
Peter Hutchings remarks on realism intertwining with serious social issues, noting its commercial success in films like Saturday Night and Sunday Morning and A Taste of Honey.
Filmmaker's Perspective
Tension exists between expressive and objective styles:
Debates on the merits of montage versus mise-en-scène, focusing on the individual image versus the interplay of multiple images.
Historical Developments (1910s-1920s)
In the Soviet Union and Germany, filmmaking was recognized as both a medium for propaganda and artistic expression.
Rudolph Arnheim posited silent cinema's capacity for expressing creativity beyond mere reproduction of reality.
Emphasis on the filmmaker's role as a creative figure with a distinct vision.
Sergei Eisenstein's Contributions
Eisenstein viewed the essence of film as derived from the relationships between individual images, emphasizing editing as a transformative tool for reality.
Asks how viewers can resist imposed social or political realities through filmmakers' choices.
Alternative Perspectives
Post-WWII critic Andre Bazin offered a counterpoint to Eisenstein:
Emphasized the long take and minimal editing, asserting that montage limits ambiguity and complicates realism.
Bazin valued ‘spatial realism’ as seen in films by Jean Renoir, contrasting with the documentary-like approach of Italian neo-realism.
Theoretical Constructs in Realism
Colin McCabe connected popular cinema to 19th-century novels, arguing for a classic realist text that embraces accepted truths.
Peter Wollen examined orthodox and counter-cinema, elucidating how cinema can present narratives differently based on viewer experience.
The Nature of Illusion in Cinema
Bazin argued that cinema’s illusion stems from inherent realism rather than theatrical conventions.
Suggested perfection in trick work is essential for effective realism—a sentiment echoed by Andrew Tudor, who critiqued Bazin’s perspective on ‘true’ versus ‘pseudorealism’.
Conclusion
Realism encompasses a spectrum of cinematic styles, presenting nuanced social issues while balancing artistic expression with representation of reality.