Study Notes on The Ethics of War: The Just War Tradition

UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO LIBRARIES COPYRIGHT NOTICE

  • This material is protected by copyright and provided in compliance with Canadian copyright law. It emphasizes the importance of respecting intellectual property within educational contexts and covers a range of topics relevant to copyright practices:

    • Instructor Ownership of Copyright: Educators have legal rights over the material they create, which affects how resources are shared within and beyond courses.

    • Obtainable Licenses or Permissions: Understanding licenses associated with educational material, including Creative Commons, is crucial for lawful sharing and usage.

    • Open Licensing: This involves understanding types of materials that fall under licenses allowing free use, modification, and sharing.

    • Material in the Public Domain: Works not protected by copyright can be freely used without permission, offering opportunities for teaching and research.

    • Fair Dealing: Under Canadian law, certain uses of copyrighted material may be permissible without seeking formal permission, specifically for education, research, or criticism.

For Instructors

  • Materials and resources may only be distributed securely through password-protected platforms (such as Quercus) specifically designed for course-enrolled students.

  • It is essential for instructors to ensure that they reacquire permission to share the same materials if they intend to use them in succeeding courses.

For Students

  • Materials are provided solely for personal and educational use, highlighting core prohibitions:

    • Sharing Copies: Distribution of course materials without permission is strictly prohibited.

    • Making Copies: Students may not reproduce materials but are allowed to create copies necessary for course-related work such as downloading or printing for study purposes.

  • It is expected that every student complies with copyright laws; any questions regarding this should be directed to the Scholarly Communications and Copyright Office at copyright@library.utoronto.ca.

Ethics and World Politics

  • Course Code: DC 33.7J03

  • Edited by: Duncan Bell

  • Published by: Oxford University Press

  • The publication aims for excellence in research, scholarship, and education, maintaining a global outreach while upholding the rights © Oxford University Press, 2010. All rights reserved, indicating that materials included herein cannot be reproduced without prior permission.

Chapter Overview: The Ethics of War: The Just War Tradition

  • Authored by: Nicholas Rengger

  • The chapter structure proceeds as follows:

    • Introduction (16.1): Engages with essential questions regarding the ethical implications of coercive force in political societies.

    • History of the Tradition (16.2): A historical examination of just war principles across cultures and their evolution.

    • Classical vs Modern Just War (16.3): Explores the differences between traditional just war criteria and contemporary interpretations.

    • Criticisms of the Tradition (16.4): A critical lens on the effectiveness and applicability of just war theories today.

    • Case Study: Just War After 9/11 (16.5): Evaluates the application of just war principles in the context of global terrorism.

    • Conclusion (16.6): Reflects on the continuing relevance of just war ethics in addressing contemporary global conflicts.

16.1 Introduction

  • Key Insight: The political usage of coercive force is recognized universally among historical and modern political entities, bringing forth significant ethical dilemmas.

  • Key Questions:

    1. Is a society justified in using any form of force to secure its interests?

    2. What specific conditions allow for such force to be deemed permissible?

    3. Should the use of such force adhere to established ethical norms and rules?

  • Various perspectives exist on the ethics of warfare:

    1. The perspective of absolutism, where war is deemed always illegitimate (pacifism).

    2. A contrasting view posits that all actions are acceptable in warfare.

    3. An intermediate position advocates for limited moral restraints in times of war, suggesting a balance between necessity and ethics.

16.2 History of the Tradition

  • Universal Normative Attitudes: Notably, nearly every culture and historical epoch has established norms regarding what is permissible during wartime actions. Significant historical examples include:

    • Ancient Greece: Societies held conventions such as the ransoming of prisoners and the honoring of sacred truces during conflicts.

    • Roman Practices: Although they possessed complex conventions, Roman authority imposed fewer limitations once a conflict was justified as legitimate.

  • Christian Influence on War Legitimacy: During its early stages, Christian doctrine largely favored pacifism; however, this perspective gradually evolved to permit military actions under specific legitimate circumstances, heavily influenced by thinkers such as Augustine and Thomas Aquinas.

    • Augustine’s Position: He recognized the unavoidable nature of conflict and permitted warfare led by legitimate authority while stressing humility and moral intent in combatants.

    • Aquinas’ Contributions: He established foundational conditions for a just war:

      1. Legitimacy of the authority waging war.

      2. Existence of a just cause (e.g., addressing wrongdoing).

      3. The right intention focusing on promoting good and avoiding evil.

  • Development during the Middle Ages: The classic just war doctrine flourished through the contributions of theologians like Francisco de Vitoria, whose arguments were shaped by natural law and humanitarian considerations, especially in relation to wars against non-Christian entities.

16.3 Classical vs Modern Just War

  • Definitions:

    • Jus ad bellum: Pertains to the justice underlying the reasons for going to war.

    • Jus in bello: Refers to justice maintained during the conduct of warfare.

  • Classic Positions: Traditional just war theory focused on principles such as the necessity of a just cause, legitimate authority, righteous intent, proportionality, the notion of last resort, and reasonable hope for success.

  • Modern Evolution: The just war tradition has undergone transformation, adopting a more legal framework and addressing complex issues surrounding humanitarian interventions, preventive wars, and critiques regarding state-centric approaches in the face of growing cosmopolitan ideas.

16.4 Criticisms of the Tradition

  • Key criticisms of the just war tradition are:

    1. It arguably promotes the use of force instead of mitigating it.

    2. The legislative frameworks of war often lag behind rapid advancements in military technology and strategies.

    3. Vague interpretations of jus in bello could allow military necessity to override established ethical rules.

    4. The secularization of just war critiques its deeply embedded religious origins, raising questions about its broader applicability in a pluralistic society.

16.5 Case Study: The Just War After 9/11

  • Context of 9/11 Attacks: The actions orchestrated by Al-Qaeda led to considerable redefinitions pertaining to the justifications for global conflict, prompting new ethical considerations in warfare.

    • The justification for military actions against Al-Qaeda presented challenges pertaining to issues of legitimate authority and the clarity of moral grounds for these actions.

  • Just War Criteria Application:

    1. The war in Afghanistan post-9/11 is generally viewed as more justifiable compared to the military action in Iraq in 2003.

    2. Critiques surrounding the Iraq War predominantly addressed insufficient evidence regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) and questionable just cause.

    3. Evaluations of proportionality and legitimate authority in these conflicts frequently highlighted shortcomings in justifying military actions.

16.6 Conclusion

  • The just war tradition is intricately linked with addressing the ethical challenges posed by the use of force across various political landscapes. Its historical evolution indicates that it remains relevant in contemporary discussions regarding international warfare ethics.

Discussion Questions

  1. What ethical dilemmas arise from the use of force in modern politics?

  2. How did early Christianity confront the complexities of justifying war?

  3. In what ways have concepts of just war evolved from the fifth to the sixteenth centuries?

  4. How can traditional just war criteria for jus ad bellum and jus in bello be assessed in current conflicts?

  5. Is there a necessity to develop jus post bellum criteria for ethical warfare?

  6. What are the primary criticisms facing the just war tradition?

  7. Can just war philosophy be successfully secularized, and if so, how?

  8. What constitutes legitimate instances of 'supreme emergencies' that may justify war?

  9. How can we differentiate between pre-emption and preventive warfare in the context of just war?