Prework Assignment Reflection & Group Activity
Small-Group Logistics
- Total students present: 20
- Planned group size: 3 students per group
- Mathematical breakdown: 3 students/group20 students=6 full groups with 2 students left over
- Result: 6 groups of 3 and 1 group of 2.
- Instructor will let students decide how to form those groups.
- Possible methods proposed:
- "Different line-up" (unspecified)
- Alphabetical ordering (e.g., by last name or by high-school name)
- High-school of graduation (example: “Austin High School” → placed in the “A” position, goes first).
- Example of personal ordering logic: One speaker notes, “My hyperthermal is ‘C’,” implying an alternate criterion that still places people in an ordered line.
Discussion Prompts for Each Group
- Describe how you responded to the pre-work assignment.
- Explain why you chose the format (essay, outline, multimedia, etc.) you submitted.
- Identify surprises you encountered while completing the task.
- Detail challenges faced while engaging with the assigned text(s):
- Need to re-read passages
- Highlighting or annotating key phrases
- Looking up or revisiting unfamiliar vocabulary
- Tracking concepts that appear in multiple sections (“I saw this word previously; let me circle back”).
Reading Load & Academic Context
- Historical comparison of course workload:
- Previously, class met four days a week: Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday (not the usual M/W/F).
- Students juggled four separate texts simultaneously, increasing cognitive demand.
- Specific article referenced: Peter McLaren (published in Ed February).
- Described as “good but hard to digest” when combined with other required readings.
- Emphasizes depth and density of critical theory language—necessitating close, repeated reading.
Reading Strategies Highlighted
- Re-reading difficult paragraphs to achieve clarity.
- Selective highlighting to mark pivotal ideas or recurring terminology.
- Keeping a running vocabulary list for unknown words.
- Employing note-taking to link themes across multiple sources.
Pedagogical & Practical Takeaways
- Recognizing that heavy, theory-laden texts (e.g., McLaren) often require iterative reading cycles.
- Allowing students some autonomy in group formation can improve comfort and collaboration.
- Encouraging meta-cognition: students reflect not only on what they read but how they read and why particular formats aid their comprehension.