Week 3 B
Behavioral Neuroscience Research methods
correlation tests: relation, ex. to see if a certain neurons activity is correlated with the behavior
ex. touching a crayfish which causes a depolarization of the LGI neuron leads to a tail reflex
We can say that the LGI activity is correlated with the tail flick; involved in the tail flick behavior
necessity: to see if the activity of neurons is necessary to cause activity even when the cell is not acitivated
dam
ex. We hyperpolarized the LGI neuron and it cant fired the action potential, if we touch the crayfish there is no tail flex
We can then say that the acitivty of the LGI is necessary to cause the behavior
Sufficiency: to see if the activity of neurons are sufficient enough to cause behavior
if the behavior occurs when the neurons are stimulated even when not though possible
ex. We cause an action potential to the LGI neuron artificially to see if we can cause the tail flick
Passes the test since when activity there is a tail flick
Classic Methods
Old Way: Brain Lesions → Tests for Correlation
damage to neural tissue (stereotaxic surgery) → using heat or electricity
Traumatic Injury
Stroke, removal of tissue
Goal: if a certain part of the brain was responsible for a behavior then damage will impair that function
Damage to the same part of the brain across patients leading to the same impairment show connection to function
Pharmacology → Tests for Sufficiency
Use of lidocaine and glutamate agonists
The inactivation → Tests for necessity
Using GABA and Lidocaine
The Activation → tests for sufficiency
Glutamate Agonists
Other Sufficiency
Electrical Stimulation to activate nearby cells
Other Correlation Examples
Testing with electrodes and brain imaging to see what regions are active when the behavior occurs
electrodes record the action potentials but only indirect measures of activity
Limitations
A single brain region will have a big diversity of different cell types which makes the older methods insufficient
There is no specificity to these methods since they will always effect more than one of the cells that are being studied
Solution: The use of modern methods
Optogenetics
optogenetics
Discovered through the opsin in algae in bacteria
Uses genetic tools to insert light sensitive ion channels into neurons
use lasers to inactivate/activiate neurons in the brain
Channelrhodopsin → responds to blue light and allows for Na+ ions to depolarize
Halorhodopsin → responds to yellow light and allows for Cl- ions to hyperpolarize
Six Steps to Optogenetics → adding the channels into mammals to study them
Make a genetic sequence for the encoded gene and a promoter sequence which will be for a specific gene
We insert the genetic sequence into a virus
injection of the virus into the brain region of interest; Virus infects the specific cells and creates channelrhodopsin/halorhodopsin in them
Implant a fiberoptic cable connect to a light source into the specific brain region
The light will either open or close the channels
We can record the activity of the cells to see how they cause specific behaviors
Example:
The rat had a virus inserted into the VAG region which is response for the freezing response in them when they’re in danger
The promoters for the channelrhodposion was glutamatergic and when the blue light shone through the fiber-optic then we can see that the freezing response had been initiated
Chemogenetics *
Using engineered receptors (DREADDs) to activate or inhibit
Dreadd receptors are derived from acetylcholine receptors to now bind the clozapine-N-Oxide
DREADD: Desiner Receptor Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs
Use the system to target genes of interest
Uses Clozapine N Oxide
We will also use a virus and promoter sequence to insert these modified receptors
We can just inject the virus into the specific brain region
We will then inject clozapine-N-oxide to the bloodstream to express the receptor that can be excitatory or inhibitory
When active the channel will activate a g protein cascade which leads to the opening of a specific channel
Excitation: HM3Dq Receptor
Inhibition: HM3Di Receptor
example: Inhibiting Pain with Dredds
neurons in the PAG that control pain
clozapine-n-oxide caues no action potentinal and leads to no pain perception
Selectivity
both dredd receptors and optogenetics target specific proteing and specific regions of the brain
can target specific regions of the brain by using a promoter of a specific neuron and the virus sequence
help us control only a specific function by targetting a specific group of cells
Calcium Imaging
records specific neuron types in a given brain area
-
Correlating Brain Activity to Behavior
Comparison of Neccessity and Sufficiency Methods
Brain Lesions → destroying parts of the brain
con: permanent, no cell type specificity
Intracranial Drug Infusions → temporarily inactivates neurons in the brain with the use of a drug
temporary and slow,no cell type specificity
electrode stimulation → disruption of neurons through electircal currecent
pros: is temporary and fast,no cell type specificity
Chemogentics (DREADDS) → genetically engineers a designer drugs to be injected into the body
selective, temporary, and slow
Optogenetic → the use of a laser light connected to a fiber-optic to target neurons
temporary, fast, selective, you need to implant the fiber-optic in the brain of the organism which is invasive and permanent
Neural Recordings in Humans
EEG (Electroencephalography)
Putting electrode beads on the skin of the skull
Records combined neural activity in an entire brain region
ex. hearing a crowd making noise but being unable to hear individual screams
Pros: noninvasive, accurately classifies brain states (awake or sleeping), diagnosing, fast
Cons: unable to record individual action potentials
PET (Positron Emission Tomography) Scan
Radioactive ligands (glucose) are injected into the bloodstream
The scanner will detect the concentration of the radioactive ligands in the brain while individuals are doing a task to see what parts are active
We can contrast the concentrations between patients
Pros: provides infomration regardinthe whoel brain
Cons: injection is invasive
Other Tests
fMRI: (expensive) noninvasive test which provides high spatial resolution and we could tell where each signal comes from but is also slow to detect which brain regions are active during certain tasks
Detect the tissues that are consuming the most oxygen
In Vivo Recording: recording invdividual cells with electrodes in the brain but does not provide entire brain activity
electrodes: (cheap) recording lots of indivudal neurons in a brain region but we can only record that specific brain region and is fast
Other Methods of Studying Anatomy/Structure
CAT/CT Scan
Computerized Axial tomography Scanning: produces a series of x rays from different angles from the planes to brain a 3D image
involves radiation
MRI → Noninvasive
Magetic resonance imaging: produces information on what brain regions are active baased on blood oxygenation levels
provides anatomical brain information
Works by measuring the radiofrequency waves emitted by H atoms when exposed to a magnetic field
Measures shapes and sizes of brain regions across individuals
Gives us information of anatomy changes due to degneration and location of damgetion to see that damage is associated with a behavior
Ex Vivo (previously living tissues) Analyses in extracted brain tissues
Anatomical Staining:
To detect specific proteins in a tissue
Process: Using antibodies that will bind to those proteins and then make a treatment that will make those antibodies flourescent
You can overlap the stains to see what proteins are in specific cells in a brain region
Characterizies which proteins are found in specific regions in the brain
In Situ Hybridization
Using a radioactive probe to detect neurons with a specific RNA/DNA to see where the gene is activated
see where certain mRNA is being produce in certain brain regions
to see where and when a certain gene is being expressed
see the activated genes in a neuron
allows to see which neurons are activated in specific brain regions
Things to Consider
INvasiveness
experimental or correlation
in vivo (living) or ex vivo (extracted tissue)