Khrushchev's Letters to Kennedy, Oct 26 and Oct 27 (1)

Page 1: Background of the Communication

  • Date and Context: October 26, 1962, Moscow, evening at 7 p.m.

  • Sender and Recipient: Letter from Chairman Nikita Khrushchev to President John F. Kennedy, delivered via a messenger with accompanying letter from Gromyko.

  • Purpose: Addressing the escalating situation regarding Cuba and nuclear tensions.

Khrushchev's Assurances and Philosophy

  • Understanding of Situation: Khrushchev acknowledges Kennedy's letter from October 25 and notes Kennedy’s understanding and sense of responsibility.

  • Focus on Peace:

    • Emphasizes the desire for peace from both Communists and capitalists.

    • Critiques war as a calamity, prioritizing labor as a means to achieve goals.

    • States that Communists value life and dislike conflicts, stressing the importance of stable peace for all peoples.

Concerns Addressed

  • Threat of War: Warns that threatening war leads to mutual destruction, quoting his experiences in wars.

  • Accusation of Offensive Weapons: Refutes U.S. claims of offensive weapons in Cuba, stating their defensive nature as per the Cuban government's request.

Military Interpretations

  • Definitions of Weapons: Discusses how the same weapons can have different interpretations based on their deployment.

  • Military Man Perspective: Argues that the true offensive capability lies with people (military troops), not just the weapons themselves.

Page 2: Military Strategy and Misinterpretations

  • Example of Artillery: Describes how a cannon can be either offensive or defensive depending on its deployment context.

  • Misinterpretation: Asserts that U.S. perceptions of Cuban military preparations are misguided; weapons are for protection.

  • Cuba's Capability: Challenges the notion that Cuba could effectively attack the U.S., underscoring a lack of strategic rationale.

Shared Responsibility for Peace

  • Rationale Against War: Emphasizes mutual understanding among rational leaders regarding the consequences of war and the desire to coexist peacefully.

  • Desire for Peaceful Competition: Expresses a wish for competition based on peaceful means rather than military confrontations.

Page 3: Denouncing U.S. Actions

  • Quarantine Labeling: Critiques U.S. naval actions as reminiscent of piracy, especially regarding the Cuban quarantine.

  • Cargo Assurances: Claims that Soviet ships heading to Cuba carry peaceful goods, indicating non-hostile intentions.

  • Call for Rationality: Urges President Kennedy to control passions and prioritize peace over aggression.

Appeal for Negotiation

  • U Thant's Proposal: Mentions UN Secretary General's suggestions for de-escalation through avoiding arms shipments and preventing confrontational naval actions.

  • Response to U.S. Intervention: Discusses previous U.S. interventions in Cuba, illustrating the motivations behind Soviet support as a protective measure.

Page 4: Humanitarian Rationale and Shared Interests

  • Soviet Support for Cuba: Stresses that Soviet assistance to Cuba is based on humanitarian principles, recalling Russia's own past revolutions and foreign interventions.

  • Reassurance of Non-Intrusion: Claims non-interference in Cuba's domestic politics while expressing support for its security and sovereignty.

  • Request for U.S. Assurances: Proposes that if the U.S. guarantees non-aggression toward Cuba, the situation could de-escalate, leading to disarmament.

No Interest in Warfare

  • Critique of Armaments: Highlights the destructive nature of arms accumulation and advocates for reduction, framing it as insanity to prioritize military buildup over human value and societal progress.

Page 5: Call for Rational Action

  • Consequences of Actions: Warns against the perils of aggressive actions and escalating tensions, suggesting a rational approach is necessary to prevent catastrophe.

  • Invitation to Collaborate: Opens the door to mutual cooperation based on respect for sovereignty and stability, emphasizing that restraint will benefit both sides.

Conclusion of Negotiations

  • Proposes Bilateral Agreement: Suggests a commitment to eliminating offensive weapons on both sides, along with mutual respect for territorial integrity.

  • Next Steps: Encourages the immediate establishment of a timeline for these agreements and inspections to build trust and alleviate global tension.

Page 6: Response to Kennedy's Suggestions

  • Appreciation for Peace Efforts: Acknowledges Kennedy's proposed measures and views them positively as efforts toward peace.

  • Cuba's Security Explained: Justifies Soviet support for Cuba by emphasizing the importance of defense for the Cuban state.

American Military Presence as a Concern

  • U.S. Missile Deployment: Highlights the existence of U.S. missiles positioned strategically around the USSR, showcasing a reciprocal sense of threat and insecurity.

Cooperation Through Dialogue

  • Mediator Role: Recognizes the importance of UN mediation and proposes continued discussions to normalize relations.

Proposal for Mutual Disarmament

  • Reciprocal Removal of Weapons: Proposes that if the U.S. removes its missiles from Turkey, the USSR will dismantle its offensive capabilities in Cuba.

  • Monitoring Commitments: Suggests that both countries could allow inspections by UN representatives to ensure compliance and build trust.

Global Peace is Paramount

  • Stress on Humanity: Points to a shared global need for rational governance and wise diplomacy in addressing complex international issues to prevent war.