Meeting of the Monies: The offeror (the person making the offer) and offeree (the person receiving the offer) must agree on the terms to create a valid contract.
Nature of an Offer: An offer can be an act or statement proposing definite terms allowing the offeree to create a contract through acceptance.
Completeness of an Offer: An offer is considered complete upon being made.
Objective Standard: Courts evaluate offers and acceptances based on how a reasonable person would interpret the actions, not on the subjective intentions of the parties involved.
Example - Auction Paddle: Waving a paddle at an auction is interpreted as a bid, not as an action based on personal feelings.
Offeror vs. Offeree:
The offeror initiates the deal (e.g., proposes a price).
The offeree responds (e.g., agrees to a price).
Negotiation Dynamics: The roles can swap during negotiation; participation in offers can change depending on where the discussion leads to agreement.
Two Key Questions:
Did the offer engage in a bargain?
Are the terms reasonably definite?
Importance of Definiteness: Clear terms are crucial for understanding obligations.
Invitation to Bid: Inviting bids does not constitute an offer; the bids themselves are offers to the inviter.
Price Quotes: Simply providing a price is not an offer. It may vary and does not create a binding agreement.
Letters of Intent: Indicates intent for further negotiation rather than a definite offer.
Advertisements: Generally considered invitations for offers, not offers themselves.
Black Friday Context: Advertisements may have specific terms (e.g., limited quantities) that bind them under certain circumstances due to societal expectations.
Unilateral Contracts:
Example 1: Car dealership offering a car for a whimsical trade (e.g., 5,000 bananas).
Example 2: Pepsi advertisement for a military jet which was deemed mere puffery and unenforceable.
Characterization: Putting an item up for auction is not an offer. Bidders make offers through their bids.
Final Acceptance: "Going once, going twice, sold" indicates acceptance of the highest bid.
Importance of Clear Terms: Contracts should specify what is being offered to establish clarity in the performance required.
Case Study - Johnny: A promise to provide assistance without specifics is not actionable, illustrating the need for definite commitments.
Common Law: Enforces contracts only if there is strict parity between offer and acceptance (mirror image rule).
UCC: Allows more flexibility. Contracts can be valid even with missing essential terms; includes gap fillers for price or quantity.
Gap Filling Provisions: If terms like price or quantity are omitted, UCC can provide a reasonable substitute, facilitating a transaction.
Requirements Contracts: Parties agree on all their needs for specified goods (e.g., all broccoli harvest).
Output Contracts: Agreement to supply all output (e.g., all aluminum needed without a specific quantity).
Revocation: An offer can be revoked at any time before acceptance.
Irrevocable Contracts: Limited situations such as option contracts (bilateral commitment to keep an offer open) and firm offers (written offers by merchants).
Mechanics of Rejection: Any response that is not a clear acceptance is a rejection (including counteroffers).
Expiration: Offers expire at the end of a specified time or when reasonably determined.
Destruction of Subject Matter: If the item to be sold is destroyed, the offer is immediately void.
Valid Acceptance: Needs to be communicated explicitly through action or spoken agreement. Silence is not acceptance.
Battle of the Forms: UCC allows for discrepancies in acceptance forms and modifies the mirror image rule to facilitate business transactions.