Comprehensive Study Notes for University Canadian Law
Foundations of Law and the Rule of Law
● Habeas Corpus ● Translated from Latin as "you shall have the body." ● Serves as a protection for individuals against being imprisoned without a valid legal reason. ● Establishes the requirement that a person must be brought before a court to determine if their detention is lawful.
● Magna Carta () ● Signed by King John of England in the year . ● Primarily functioned to limit the power of the monarch. ● Established the foundational principle that rulers must obey the law. ● Heavily influenced the development of the modern Rule of Law.
● Rule of Law ● Dictates that everyone is subject to the law. ● No individual is above the law, encompassing government officials and leaders. ● Mandates that laws must be applied fairly and equally to all citizens.
Sources of Canadian Law
● Constitutional Law ● Recognized as the highest law in Canada. ● Includes the Constitution Act, and the Constitution Act, . ● Establishes that all other laws passed in Canada must comply with the Constitution.
● Statute Law ● Refers to laws passed by Parliament (federal) or provincial legislatures. ● Also commonly referred to as legislation.
● Common Law ● Refers to law that is created through the decisions of courts. ● Based heavily on the principle of precedent. ● Judges utilize outcomes from previous cases to decide new or similar cases.
Division of Powers: Constitution Act,
● Federal Government Powers (Section ) ● Criminal law. ● Defence. ● Banking. ● Immigration. ● Marriage and divorce.
● Provincial Government Powers (Section ) ● Education. ● Hospitals. ● Property and civil rights. ● Municipalities. ● Marriage ceremonies.
Unit : Rights and Freedoms in Canada
● Distinction Between Rights and Freedoms ● Rights: Defined as legal, moral, or social entitlements that every person possesses. ● Freedoms: Defined as the ability to act without experiencing unreasonable interference.
● Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ● Purpose: To protect individuals from government actions that unfairly infringe upon their rights. ● Part of the Constitution since it was repatriated in . ● As constitutional law, it overrides any conflicting laws.
● Scope of the Charter ● Applies to: Federal government, provincial governments, municipal governments, Crown corporations, and federally regulated organizations. ● Does NOT apply to: Private disputes between individuals.
Charter Constraints and Clauses
● Section : Reasonable Limits Clause ● Dictates that rights and freedoms can be limited if the limits are reasonable. ● These limits must be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.
● Section : Notwithstanding Clause ● Allows governments to temporarily override certain Charter rights for a limited period. ● Can override: Fundamental freedoms, legal rights, and equality rights. ● Cannot override: Democratic rights or mobility rights.
Specific Charter Rights and Freedoms
● Fundamental Freedoms (Section ) ● Freedom of religion. ● Freedom of thought. ● Freedom of belief. ● Freedom of opinion. 自由 of expression. ● Freedom of peaceful assembly. ● Freedom of association.
● Democratic Rights (Sections -) ● Section : The right to vote and the right to run for political office. ● Section : Requirement for elections to be held at least every years. ● Section : Requirement that Parliament and provincial legislatures must meet at least once every months.
● Legal Rights (Sections -) ● Section : The right to life, liberty, and security of the person. ● Protection against unreasonable search and seizure. ● Protection against arbitrary detention. ● The right to counsel (legal representation). ● The right to a fair trial. ● The presumption of innocence. ● Protection against cruel and unusual punishment.
● Equality Rights (Section ) ● States that everyone is equal before and under the law. ● Provides protection from discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age, or mental or physical disability.
Enforcement of Charter Rights
● Section ● Enables individuals to go to court when they believe their rights have been violated. ● Possible remedy: The exclusion of evidence that was obtained illegally.
● Section ● Empowers the courts to strike down laws that are found to be unconstitutional. ● Possible judicial remedies: ● Striking down: Declaring a law invalid. ● Reading down: Interpreting a law narrowly so it remains constitutional. ● Reading in: Adding language to a law to make it comply with the Charter.
Unit : Principles of Criminal Law
● Definition of a Crime ● An act or omission that is prohibited by law and punishable by the state.
● Elements of a Criminal Offence ● Actus Reus (The guilty act): ● Examples: Stealing, assault, fraud, or failing to perform a legal duty. ● Mens Rea (The guilty mind): ● The accused intended or understood the consequences of their actions. ● Conviction requirement: Both elements are usually required for a criminal conviction.
● States of Mind Establishing Mens Rea ● Intent: The person meant to commit the specific act. ● Knowledge: The person was aware of what they were doing. ● Criminal Negligence: Characterized by a reckless disregard for the safety of others. ● Recklessness: The person recognizes a risk and chooses to ignore it. ● Wilful Blindness: The person suspects the truth but deliberately avoids confirming it to remain unaware.
Involvement in Crimes and the Jury System
● Levels of Involvement ● Perpetrator: The individual who actually commits the crime. ● Aiding: Helping someone commit a crime. ● Abetting: Encouraging someone to commit a crime. ● Counselling: Advising or persuading another person to commit an offence. ● Accessory After the Fact: Helping an offender avoid arrest or conviction.
● Jury Qualifications ● Jurors must be Canadian citizens. ● Jurors must be adults. ● Jurors must understand English or French. ● Jurors must not have disqualifying criminal records.
● Jury Selection and Challenges ● Potential jurors are questioned before selection. ● Challenge for Cause: A procedure where a juror can be removed if there is concern regarding bias or an inability to be fair.
Rules of Evidence in Criminal Trials
● Admissibility Requirements ● Evidence must be relevant to the case. ● Evidence must be reliable. ● Evidence must be legally obtained.
● Types of Evidence ● Direct Evidence: Directly proves a fact (e.g., eyewitness testimony). ● Circumstantial Evidence: Suggests a fact through inference (e.g., fingerprints found at a crime scene). ● Testimonial evidence. ● Physical evidence. ● Documentary evidence. ● Expert evidence.
Legal Defences and Sentencing
● Examples of Legal Defences ● Self-defence. ● Duress. ● Necessity. ● Automatism. ● Mental disorder. ● Mistake of fact.
● Goals of Sentencing ● Denunciation: Condemning unlawful conduct. ● Deterrence: Discouraging future crimes. ● Separation: Protecting society by removing offenders from the community. ● Rehabilitation: Helping offenders change their behaviour. ● Reparation: Compensating victims for their loss. ● Responsibility: Promoting accountability in the offender.
● Traditional vs. Restorative Justice ● Traditional Justice: ● Focus: Punishment, the offender, and the broken law. ● Goal: Determine guilt and provide a sentence. ● Restorative Justice: ● Focus: Repairing harm, victims, and community involvement. ● Goal: Reconciliation and healing.
Unit : Civil Law and Torts
● Parties in a Civil Action ● Plaintiff: The person who initiates the lawsuit. ● Defendant: The person being sued.
● Standard of Proof ● Balance of Probabilities: The standard used in civil law, meaning it is more likely than not () that the claim is true.
● Civil Remedies ● Compensatory Damages: Intended to compensate the plaintiff for losses. ● General Damages: For non-monetary losses like pain and suffering. ● Special Damages: For specific, quantifiable financial losses. ● Punitive Damages: Intended to punish the defendant for egregious wrongdoing. ● Nominal Damages: A small award given when rights were technically violated but the actual loss was minimal.
Tort Law and the Concept of Negligence
● Tort Law Overview ● A tort is a civil wrong that causes harm. ● Tort Law provides remedies for harm caused to people or property. ● Intentional Torts: Examples include assault, battery, false imprisonment, trespass, and defamation. ● Unintentional Torts (Negligence): Careless conduct that causes foreseeable harm.
● Stage of Negligence: Duty of Care ● Obligation to avoid harming others. ● Neighbour Principle: Established in Donoghue v. Stevenson. You owe a duty of care to people who may reasonably be affected by your actions. ● Foreseeability: A reasonable person could have predicted that harm would occur.
● Stage of Negligence: Standard of Care ● The level of caution expected of an individual. ● Reasonable Person: A person who acts with ordinary intelligence and care. ● Professional Liability: Professionals are held to a specialized standard of care, measured against a reasonable professional in the same field.
● Stage of Negligence: Causation ● Cause-in-Fact: Determined by the "but for" test. Would the injury have occurred but for the defendant's actions? ● Remoteness of Damage: Asks if the injury was foreseeable. ● Intervening Act: An unforeseeable event that occurs and breaks the chain of causation.
Family Law: Marriage and Support
● Essential Requirements for Marriage ● . Mental capacity. ● . Freedom of consent. ● . Age requirements. ● . No prohibited relationships (e.g., close family). ● . No existing marriage.
● Formal Requirements for Marriage ● . Marriage licence. ● . Legal ceremony. ● . Two witnesses. ● . Authorized officiant.
● Grounds for Marriage Breakdown ● . Living separate and apart for at least year. ● . Adultery. ● . Physical cruelty. ● . Mental cruelty.
● Support Systems ● Child Support: Money paid by one parent to help support children after separation to meet the child's needs and ensure financial support from both parents. ● Spousal Support: Money paid to a financially dependent spouse after separation to reduce economic hardship and provide assistance. ● Factors for Spousal Support: Length of relationship, roles during the relationship, financial need, ability to pay, and existing agreements.
Landmark Cases in Canadian Law
● R. v. Morgentaler () ● Facts: Dr. Morgentaler challenged the validity of Canada's abortion law. ● Legal Issue: Did the existing abortion law violate Charter rights? ● Decision: Yes. ● Reasoning: The law violated Section (life, liberty, and security of the person). ● Significance: Canada's abortion law was struck down.
● R. v. Lavallee ( ) ● Facts: A woman in an abusive relationship killed her partner. ● Legal Issue: Could battered woman syndrome be used to support a claim of self-defence? ● Decision: Yes. ● Reasoning: Expert evidence demonstrated she reasonably believed she was in imminent danger. ● Significance: Expanded the legal understanding of self-defence and domestic violence.
● Halpern et al. v. Attorney General of Canada () ● Facts: Same-sex couples challenged the traditional legal definition of marriage. ● Legal Issue: Did restricting marriage to opposite-sex couples violate equality rights under the Charter? ● Decision: Yes. ● Reasoning: The traditional definition was found to violate Section equality rights. ● Significance: Marriage was redefined as "the voluntary union for life of two persons to the exclusion of all others," laying the groundwork for the legalization of same-sex marriage.
Essential Vocabulary and Key Terms
● Habeas Corpus ● Rule of Law ● Constitutional Law ● Statute Law ● Common Law ● Charter of Rights and Freedoms ● Section (Reasonable Limits) ● Section (Notwithstanding Clause) ● Actus Reus ● Mens Rea ● Intent ● Recklessness ● Wilful Blindness ● Duty of Care ● Neighbour Principle ● Foreseeability ● Standard of Care ● Reasonable Person ● Cause-in-Fact ● Remoteness of Damage ● Intervening Act ● Tort ● Negligence ● Child Support ● Spousal Support ● Marriage Breakdown