elections parties and campaign

๐Ÿง  MASTER NOTES โ€” ELECTIONS, PARTIES, AND CAMPAIGNS (FINAL)


๐Ÿ”น 1. POLITICAL PARTIES (FOUNDATION)

  • Legislatures are divided along party lines

  • Parties structure competition during campaigns


What are political parties?

  • Organizations that:

    • Compete in elections

    • Try to gain power

    • Represent ideas/interests

๐Ÿ“Œ CORE IDEA:

Parties are the main actors in elections


What do parties do?

  • Organize candidates

  • Present policy platforms

  • Structure choices for voters

๐Ÿ“Œ REPEAT (important):

Without parties โ†’ elections would be chaotic


๐Ÿ”น 2. PARTY SYSTEMS

Definition:

  • The number and type of parties in a political system


Key comparison:

Canada

  • Multi-party system (~3โ€“5 parties)

United States

  • Two-party system


WHY does this happen?

๐Ÿ‘‰ Electoral systems shape party systems

๐Ÿ“Œ CORE IDEA (VERY IMPORTANT):

Rules of elections determine how many parties survive


๐Ÿ”น 3. ELECTORAL SYSTEM (CORE CONCEPT)

Definition:

A set of rules that determine how votes are cast and converted into seats


Electoral systems determine:

  • How you vote

  • How votes are counted

  • Who wins

๐Ÿ“Œ CORE IDEA:

Electoral systems = rules of the game


๐Ÿ”น 4. SINGLE-MEMBER DISTRICT PLURALITY (FPTP)

Definition:

  • One district โ†’ one winner

  • Candidate with most votes wins


Key features:

  • Voters pick ONE candidate

  • No need for majority


Example countries:

  • Canada

  • US

  • UK


Strengths:

  • Simple

  • Clear winner

  • Stable governments


Weaknesses:

  • โ€œWrong winnerโ€ problem

  • Wasted votes

  • Not representative


๐Ÿ“Œ CORE IDEA:

Winning โ‰  majority support


๐Ÿ”น 5. ALTERNATIVE VOTE (RANKED)

Definition:

  • Voters rank candidates


How it works:

  1. Count first choices

  2. Eliminate lowest

  3. Redistribute votes

  4. Repeat until majority


Key feature:

  • Winner must have majority


๐Ÿ“Œ CORE IDEA:

Ensures broader support than FPTP


๐Ÿ”น 6. PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION (PR)

Definition:

  • Seats reflect percentage of votes


List PR:

  • Vote for party (not individual)

  • Parties get seats proportional to votes


Closed list:

  • Party decides candidate order


Effects:

  • More parties

  • More representation


๐Ÿ“Œ CORE IDEA:

Vote share โ‰ˆ seat share


๐Ÿ”น 7. MAJORITARIAN VS PROPORTIONAL


Majoritarian (FPTP)

  • One winner per district

  • Focus on districts

๐Ÿ‘‰ Result:

  • Fewer parties

  • Strong governments

  • Less representation


Proportional (PR)

  • Seats reflect total votes

๐Ÿ‘‰ Result:

  • More parties

  • Coalition governments

  • Better representation


๐Ÿ“Œ CORE IDEA (VERY TESTABLE):

Stability vs representation trade-off


๐Ÿ”น 8. STRATEGIC VOTING (VERY IMPORTANT)

Definition:

  • Voting for a less preferred but viable candidate


Why it happens:

  • Fear of wasting vote

  • System incentives


Example:

  • Favorite candidate = 15%

  • You switch to 42% candidate

  • To block 43% candidate


๐Ÿ“Œ CORE IDEA:

Electoral systems shape voter behavior


๐Ÿ”น 9. WHY ELECTORAL SYSTEMS MATTER

They affect:

  • Representation

  • Party systems

  • Voter behavior

  • Outcomes


๐Ÿ“Œ CORE IDEA (repeat):

Electoral systems shape EVERYTHING


๐Ÿ”น 10. ELECTORAL SYSTEM TRADE-OFFS


Majoritarian:

  • โœ” Stability

  • โŒ Less fair representation


Proportional:

  • โœ” Fair representation

  • โŒ Less stable governments


๐Ÿ“Œ CORE IDEA:

No perfect system โ€” only trade-offs


๐Ÿ”น 11. FPTP PROBLEMS (EXAM GOLD)


1. Wrong winner

  • Party wins seats without most votes


2. Close race distortion

  • Small vote difference โ†’ big seat difference


3. Lopsided majority

  • Huge majority with limited support

๐Ÿ“Œ Example:

  • 2001 BC election


๐Ÿ“Œ CORE IDEA:

FPTP distorts representation


๐Ÿ”น 12. ELECTORAL SYSTEM CHANGE


Canada:

  • Multiple reform attempts

  • BC referendums (since 2005)

  • Trudeau 2015 promise

  • Yukon plebiscite


Why reform is rare:

  • Winners benefit from current system

๐Ÿ“Œ CORE IDEA:

Those in power donโ€™t change winning rules


๐Ÿ”น 13. CAMPAIGNS + PARTISANSHIP


Campaigns:

  • Influence voters

  • Provide information


BUT:

๐Ÿ‘‰ Main driver = partisanship


Partisanship:

  • Long-term loyalty to a party


๐Ÿ“Œ CORE IDEA:

Campaigns matter, but identity matters more


๐Ÿ”น 14. BIG THEORY (MOST IMPORTANT)


Electoral systems:

  • Shape:

    • Parties

    • Votes

    • Outcomes


๐Ÿ“Œ FINAL CORE IDEA (MEMORIZE):

Rules of the game determine winners


๐Ÿ”น 15. FINAL CONCLUSION (EXAM READY)

  • Electoral systems differ in how they translate votes into seats

  • They shape party systems and voter behavior

  • Each system involves trade-offs

  • Campaigns matter, but partisanship dominates


๐Ÿง  HOW TO ANSWER EXAM QUESTIONS


โ€œWhy do electoral systems matter?โ€

โ†’ They shape:

  • representation

  • party systems

  • voter behavior


โ€œFPTP vs PR?โ€

โ†’ FPTP:

  • simple, stable

  • less representative

โ†’ PR:

  • fair, inclusive

  • less stable


โ€œWhy is reform rare?โ€

โ†’ Winners donโ€™t change rules