Mercantilism
Wealth and Power: The Mercantilist Perspective
Introduction
Quote by Sun Yat-sen (1920): Emphasizes the need for state power to protect and promote industry to recover economic rights.
Economic Rights and State Power
Context: The role of state power in promoting industry and providing employment is critical for ensuring national security and economic stability.
Historical Context of Mercantilism
Financial Crises and Liberal Economics
Shift in Liberal Perspectives: Economic liberals now advocate for increased state regulation of banks and financial markets due to financial crises.
Concerns about Security: States fear that integrated global economies threaten national security, with rising issues like unemployment and environmental harm.
Definition and Characteristics of Mercantilism
Mercantilism as the Oldest Perspective: Deeply embedded in state behavior, it focuses on wealth and power creation to ensure security.
Historical Usage: States traditionally promoted exports and limited imports to generate trade surpluses.
Relation to Realism: Both emphasize state security but differ in focus; realism includes military threats, while mercantilism emphasizes economic ones.
Neomercantilism
Definition: A modern adaptation accounting for interdependence and complexity of today's global economy.
Focus on State Instruments: Modern states utilize a mix of economic tools to safeguard societal interests.
Evolution of Mercantilist Ideas
Historical Development (16th-19th centuries)
Nation-State Formation: The rise of modern nation-states during this period emphasized economic policies for security.
Charles Tilly's Analysis: War motivated states to organize societies and adopt protective measures.
Political Centralization: Development of bureaucracies consolidated national political authority.
Economic Policies and State Responses
Industrial Policies in Britain: Strategies from Tudor monarchs highlighted the importance of state-planned industrial policies to capture key industries.
Mercantilism After the Thirty Years' War: Increased bureaucratic efforts to connect markets, establish currencies, and develop infrastructure.
Security Dilemma and Competition
Zero-Sum Perspective: States viewed each other’s gains as threats leading to increased military capabilities.
Colonialism and Economic Expansion: Control over colonies and resources was vital for states seeking wealth and power.
Economic Liberalism vs. Mercantilism
Emergence of Economic Liberalism (1840s-1870s)
Shift in British Politics: The ideas of Adam Smith became prominent, advocating for free trade and competition.
Regulatory Practices: Even proponents of free trade supported protectionist measures for certain industries.
Ricardo's Comparative Advantage: Suggested specialization in production to optimize efficiency and trade benefits.
Responses to Economic Liberalism
Countermovement: Rising competition led to protective measures by various interest groups, emphasizing continued relevance of mercantilism.
Economic Nationalism and Imperialism: Growing identification with national interests exacerbated tensions leading up to WWI.
Neomercantilism - Contemporary Practices
Responses to Economic Shifts
Global Economic Changes: The 1973 OPEC oil crisis prompted states to reassess energy dependencies and security measures.
Shift from Bipolar to Multipolar Structure: Greater emphasis on national economic security amidst global competition.
Modern Neomercantilist Strategies
Instruments of Economic Policy: Government spending, regulation, and subsidies targeted to protect local industries.
Examples of State Intervention: Promotion of export-led growth strategies in countries like Japan and South Korea.
Contemporary Issues with Neomercantilism
Energy Independence and Strategic Resources: The U.S. response to oil dependencies showcased classical mercantilist behaviors.
Global Competition for Resources: Strategic alliances and investment in domestic capabilities to ensure resource security.
Conclusion
Enduring Nature of Mercantilism
Deep-Rooted Mentality: Mercantilism remains a powerful ideology influencing state behaviors in a globalized world.
Interconnection with Economic Liberalism: Many contemporary states blend liberal policies with mercantilist practices to fortify economic stability.
Key Takeaways
Protectionist Measures: States still implement various strategies to safeguard industries, which complicate global trade dynamics.
Balancing Act: Nations must reconcile the benefits of globalization with the need for self-protection against external vulnerabilities.