Harry_and_the_Other_Answering_the_Race_Question_in_J._K._Rowling's_Harry_Potter_Jackie_C_Horne
Overview
Title: Harry and the Other: Answering the Race Question in J. K. Rowling's Harry Potter
Author: Jackie C. Horne
Published in: The Lion and the Unicorn, Volume 34, Number 1 (January 2010)
Main Focus: The paper explores how J. K. Rowling's Harry Potter series addresses issues of race and ethnic otherness.
Introduction
The challenge of critiquing an unfinished work (Rowling's series until 2007).
Literary critics are drawn to analyze the Potter series, focusing on its stance on race.
The series teaches how to confront and eradicate racism, notably through Voldemort's campaign against "Mudbloods".
Antiracism Educational Traditions
Multicultural Antiracism
Focuses on valuing diversity to combat racial oppression.
Classroom goals include enabling empathy and fostering cross-cultural understanding.
Examples include teaching Black History Month and celebrating positive racial images.
Social Justice Antiracism
A less common approach in K-12 education.
Emphasizes critical thinking to confront racism beyond individual attitudes, examining institutional structures.
Focuses on oppression and challenges students to question and dismantle systemic racism.
Critical Responses to Harry Potter's Racial Themes
Critics' views range from seeing the series as a critique of ideological differences to those depicting it as hierarchical and prejudicial.
Different interpretations stem from varying definitions of racism and remedies suggested for overcoming it.
Definitions of Antiracism
Antiracism as a recent term emerging in the 1960s; disagreement on definitions and approaches.
Universalism: Emphasizes equality and shared rights across races.
Relativism: Values cultural differences and recognizes that different doesn't equate to unequal.
The tension between these two perspectives influences educational practices and antiracist actions.
Rowling's Methods of Teaching Antiracism
Multicultural Approach through House-elves
House-elves depicted as willing servants, but their portrayal contains troubling stereotypes that connect to historical views of enslaved African Americans.
Dobby: Challenges stereotypes but highlights the humor in servitude rather than agency.
Critics debate whether Rowling aims to educate readers on stereotypes or inadvertently perpetuates them.
Social Justice through Goblins
Goblins show complexity in their relationship with wizards—seen as equals but also discriminated against.
Griphook presents an opportunity to discuss institutional racism unlike house-elves.
Contrasting depictions between house-elves and goblins signal different pedagogical approaches.
Institutional Racism in the Wizarding World
The goblins' history of rebellion and claims for rights contrast with the passive acceptance of house-elves.
Goblins are depicted as intelligent and capable, resisting wizards rather than accepting servitude.
Final Analysis of Multicultural and Social Justice Approaches
Rowling’s series showcases challenges of maintaining a solely multicultural approach that promises personal change but may neglect systemic oppression.
Hermione vs. Harry: Hermione’s activism with S.P.E.W. highlights institutional racism while Harry’s actions suggest personal change.
Conclusion
Rowling's approach raises critical questions about defining and addressing racism.
The series concludes without fully resolving the oppression of races like house-elves and goblins, even as it battles overt racism.
Reflection on whether Rowling should develop narratives that explore deeper issues of social justice.
References
Horne, Jackie C. "Harry and the Other: Answering the Race Question in J. K. Rowling’s Harry Potter." The Lion and the Unicorn, vol. 34, no. 1, 2010, pp. 76-104.