Study Notes on Biology and Crime

Introduction to Biology and Crime

  • Overview of the lecture topic: the intersection of biology and criminal behavior.

Historical Context of Biological Criminology

  • Reputation of the Biological Approach

    • Early biological research on criminology has a poor reputation due to methodological flaws.

    • This early research is now often regarded as pseudoscience—appearing scientific but lacking rigor.

  • Key Figures and Theories

    • Cesare Lombroso:

    • Considered the father of criminology.

    • Proposed the born criminal theory in the late 19th century.

    • Claimed criminals are born, based on autopsies of criminal cadavers compared to non-criminals.

    • Characterized criminals as evolutionary throwbacks, lacking traits needed to function in modern society:

      • More aggressive and animal-like.

      • Absent moral understanding of right and wrong.

    • Phrenology:

    • Developed by Franz Joseph Gall around 1800.

    • Suggested personality traits could be discerned from the bumps on the skull.

Critique of Early Biological Theories

  • Modern criminologists do not take Lombroso's theories seriously due to numerous methodological problems.

  • Recognition that early biological explanations failed to make valid connections between biological traits and criminal behavior.

Modern Biological Criminology

  • Current focus on biological predisposition rather than determinism in criminal behavior, specifically regarding violent behavior.

    • Predispositions may result from genetics or exposure to harmful substances in utero, but do not directly cause crime.

  • Example Research:

    • Investigations into the MAOA gene (referred to as the warrior gene).

    • A proportion of the population (approximately 1/3) has an underperforming MAOA gene variant.

    • Underperformance alone does not correlate strongly with violent behavior.

    • Increased risk is observed in individuals with an underperforming MAOA gene who also experienced adverse environments (e.g., neglect, abuse).

Interaction of Biology and Environment

  • Predisposition:

    • Defined as a genetic or biological tendency to react or behave in a certain way.

  • Adverse Environment:

    • Describes conditions that negatively impact development, leading to increased risk of engaging in violent behavior.

  • Factors Discussed in Textbook:

    • Neurotoxins: Exposure to substances during pregnancy, such as:

    • Alcohol (leading to Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, FAS).

    • Tobacco.

    • Heavy metals (lead, mercury).

    • Pesticides.

    • Maternal behavior impacting fetal brain development.

  • Early childhood experiences (neglect, abuse) compound biological predispositions and increase likelihood of violence.

Brain Development and Plasticity

  • Explanation of brain plasticity:

    • Brain development is malleable; shaped by social and environmental interactions.

    • Significant changes occur in brain structure during the early years of life, emphasizing the importance of early exposure to toxins and negative environments.

    • Brain development continues beyond early adulthood, contrary to past beliefs.

Case Study: Adam Labukan

  • Notable example illustrating the interaction of biological predispositions and adverse social environments.

  • Background Information:

    • Committed severe crimes (sexual assault and murder) at age 15-16.

    • Exhibited a low IQ (approximately 70), implying significant cognitive limitations (96-97% of population scores higher on IQ tests).

    • Likely suffered from Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, alongside adverse life experiences including:

    • Early abandonment by a father.

    • Physical and sexual abuse during childhood (e.g., torture by mother’s partners).

  • Incident of Crime:

    • Attack occurred after being notified of his mother’s gambling losses during her bingo game—indicating an environmental trigger.

  • Aftermath:

    • In prison, Adam engages in self-harm, indicating ongoing psychological distress and aggression linked to both biological and environmental factors.

Conclusion

  • Suggests that both biological predispositions and negative social environments interact to elevate the risk of violent behavior.

  • Emphasis on continuing exploration of the biological perspective in crime in future lectures.