Quantitative Evidence Question Strategies for Reading and Writing

Overview of Quantitative Evidence Questions

  • Quantitative evidence questions require the integration of reading comprehension with the interpretation of infographics, such as tables and graphs.
  • The primary goal is to select data from the provided infographic that effectively supports or exemplifies the argument presented in the passage.

Strategic Workflow

  • Initial Skim: Briefly examine the infographic to identify titles, units of measurement, labels, and legends.
  • Identify the Argument: Pinpoint the central claim made in the short passage to determine what specific evidence is necessary.
  • Create a Test Phrase: Boil the argument down to a brief phrase to act as a benchmark for evaluating answer choices.
  • Evaluate Choices: Test each option against the generated test phrase. Only one choice will accurately use the data to support the argument.

Case Study: Perceptions of Robot Competence

  • Context: Georgia Tech roboticists Daira Bryant and Ayanna Howard, and ethicist Jason Borenstein, studied how people perceive the competence of robots in different jobs.
  • Occupations Tested: TV news anchor, teacher, firefighter, surgeon, and tour guide.
  • The Argument: Evaluations of robot competence vary widely depending on the specific occupation being considered.
  • Test Phrase: "A wide swing depending on the job."
  • Evidence Selection:
    • Choice D was correct because it compared two jobs with a significant data gap: 82%82\% likely for tour guides versus 16%16\% likely for surgeons.
    • Ineffective choices provided data on only one profession (47%47\% likely vs. 37%37\% unlikely for teachers) or showed no difference between occupations (9%9\% neutral for both TV news anchors and surgeons).

Essential Tips for Success

  • Find the Story: Treat data as a narrative showing similarities, differences, or trends. The correct answer will tell the same story as the passage.
  • Be Flexible: Multiple combinations of data points can often support the same claim. Do not look for one specific set of numbers; instead, be open to any data that reinforces the argument.