Quantitative Evidence Question Strategies for Reading and Writing
Overview of Quantitative Evidence Questions
- Quantitative evidence questions require the integration of reading comprehension with the interpretation of infographics, such as tables and graphs.
- The primary goal is to select data from the provided infographic that effectively supports or exemplifies the argument presented in the passage.
Strategic Workflow
- Initial Skim: Briefly examine the infographic to identify titles, units of measurement, labels, and legends.
- Identify the Argument: Pinpoint the central claim made in the short passage to determine what specific evidence is necessary.
- Create a Test Phrase: Boil the argument down to a brief phrase to act as a benchmark for evaluating answer choices.
- Evaluate Choices: Test each option against the generated test phrase. Only one choice will accurately use the data to support the argument.
Case Study: Perceptions of Robot Competence
- Context: Georgia Tech roboticists Daira Bryant and Ayanna Howard, and ethicist Jason Borenstein, studied how people perceive the competence of robots in different jobs.
- Occupations Tested: TV news anchor, teacher, firefighter, surgeon, and tour guide.
- The Argument: Evaluations of robot competence vary widely depending on the specific occupation being considered.
- Test Phrase: "A wide swing depending on the job."
- Evidence Selection:
- Choice D was correct because it compared two jobs with a significant data gap: 82% likely for tour guides versus 16% likely for surgeons.
- Ineffective choices provided data on only one profession (47% likely vs. 37% unlikely for teachers) or showed no difference between occupations (9% neutral for both TV news anchors and surgeons).
Essential Tips for Success
- Find the Story: Treat data as a narrative showing similarities, differences, or trends. The correct answer will tell the same story as the passage.
- Be Flexible: Multiple combinations of data points can often support the same claim. Do not look for one specific set of numbers; instead, be open to any data that reinforces the argument.