Treaty reinsurance
Here is a clear, practical, “no-nonsense” explanation of the main treaty reinsurance types, with easy examples and quick comparisons so the ideas stick.
TREATY REINSURANCE — SIMPLE EXPLANATION
A treaty is a long-term reinsurance agreement where the reinsurer automatically accepts a defined block of business (e.g., all fire policies) from the insurer.
A. QUOTA SHARE TREATYDefinition (straightforward):
The insurer and reinsurer share every policy in fixed percentages.
How it works:
The primary insurer keeps a fixed percentage (say 30%)
The reinsurer takes the remaining percentage (70%)
The sharing applies to sum insured, premium, and losses
Example (easy math):
Sum insured = ETB 10,000,000
Quota share: 30% insurer : 70% reinsurer
Insurer retains = 30% × 10,000,000 = ETB 3,000,000
Reinsurer takes = 70% × 10,000,000 = ETB 7,000,000
If a loss of ETB 5,000,000 occurs, they also share:
Insurer pays 30% = ETB 1,500,000
Reinsurer pays 70% = ETB 3,500,000
When insurers use quota share:
For new companies with weak capital
To stabilize results
When the insurer wants strong support from reinsurers
B. SURPLUS SHARE TREATYDefinition (easy):
The insurer keeps a fixed “line” (maximum amount per risk), and the reinsurer takes the surplus above that.
Not a fixed percentage—percentage changes depending on policy size.
How it works:
Insurer decides retention: e.g., ETB 2,000,000
Surplus (extra above retention) goes to the reinsurer
Reinsurer’s share varies by the policy size
Example:
Retention (insurer): ETB 2,000,000
Surplus capacity: up to 4 lines (meaning 4 × 2,000,000 = ETB 8,000,000)
Policy 1: ETB 3,000,000
Insurer keeps 2,000,000
Reinsurer takes 1,000,000 (1 line)
Policy 2: ETB 10,000,000
Insurer keeps 2,000,000
Reinsurer takes 8,000,000 (4 lines)
Percentage changes:
For small risks: insurer keeps more
For big risks: reinsurer takes more
Why insurers use surplus treaties:
To protect against very large risks
To keep more of smaller, profitable risks
To avoid giving away too much business
C. EXCESS OF LOSS TREATY (NON-PROPORTIONAL)Definition (straight to the point):
The reinsurer pays only the part of a loss above the insurer’s retention (deductible), up to a limit.
It does NOT share premiums and risks proportionally.
How it works:
Retention = the insurer’s deductible
Reinsurer covers losses beyond that point.
Example:
Retention = ETB 1,000,000
Cover limit = ETB 4,000,000
Loss = ETB 3,000,000
Insurer pays first ETB 1,000,000
Reinsurer pays next ETB 2,000,000
Remaining limit unused
If loss = ETB 7,000,000
Insurer: 1,000,000
Reinsurer: 4,000,000
Remaining 2,000,000 is uninsured (insurer pays or another layer applies)
Why insurers like excess of loss:
Protects against severity (big losses)
Stabilizes financial results
Common in catastrophe covers (earthquake, flood)
D. REINSURANCE POOLDefinition:
A pool is a group of insurers or reinsurers who combine resources to share very large or special risks.
It spreads the risk across many participants.
How it works:
Each member contributes capital or capacity.
When a risk is written:
The pool accepts it
Losses and profits are shared based on agreed percentages
Common examples:
Aviation insurance pool
Oil & gas risk pool
Agricultural risk pools
East African reinsurance pools
Real-life analogy:
It’s like taxi owners forming a union: everyone contributes, everyone shares big expenses when a car breaks down.
QUICK COMPARISON TABLE (VERY USEFUL FOR EXAMS)
Type | Sharing Style | Typical Use | Key Feature |
|---|---|---|---|
Quota Share | Fixed % for all risks | New insurers, stability | Same ratio for every policy |
Surplus Share | Based on retention and line | Large property risks | Flexible—% changes per policy |
Excess of Loss | Pays losses above retention | Catastrophe, large claims | Non-proportional protection |
Pool | Group sharing | Very large/special risks | Many parties combine capacity |
If you want, I can also prepare exam-style questions with answers for these treaty types.