Chapter 2 - Principles of Microeconomics
Fundamental Economic Questions
- \textbf{Q1: What to Produce?}
• Allocation of resources; decision‐maker can be individuals (markets) or planners. - \textbf{Q2: How to Produce?}
• Choice of technology (labor- vs capital-intensive) and social organization of work. - \textbf{Q3: For Whom?} (distribution)
• Must set criterion: merit, need, equality, rank, power, lottery, queue. - \textbf{Q4: Growth & Development} (modern add-on)
• Populations now demand rising living standards; failure ⇒ political cost.
Distribution Mechanisms—Key Takeaways
- Merit (contribution) = core of capitalist & socialist practice.
- Need = ideal of communist principle; large incentive & measurement problems.
- Equal share, lottery, queuing = historically rare / default.
Types of Economic Systems
- Hunter-Gatherer, Slave, Traditional/Village ⇒ pre-capitalist; limited growth, follow 90\text{–}10 rule (≈90\% in agriculture).
- Capitalist ⇒ private economic property, free labor, markets decide, distribution by contribution, growth via profit motive.
- Socialist ⇒ collective (state) ownership, free-but-state-dependent labor, central planning replaces markets, distribution by contribution; communism aspires to need-based distribution.
Core Capitalism–Socialism Contrasts (5 point memo)
- Property: private vs collective (state).
- Labor: free choice vs free but single employer.
- Mechanism: markets vs planning (imperative).
- Decision unit: individuals vs planners.
- Distribution: contribution via prices vs contribution (socialism) → need (communism).
Planning in Practice (USSR)
- Annual TECHFINPRO plans for ≈200{,}000 enterprises + farms, stores, banks.
- Max 2{,}000 product categories; manual “material balancing” with ≤13 iterations; objective = balance, not optimum.
- Managerial dysfunction: agents distort output mix to hit ruble targets (e.g., book size games).
Incentives & Freedom Issues
- Need-based share kills work incentives; hard to define “need”.
- State monopoly on jobs limits true labor freedom.
- Friedman: political liberty requires economic freedom.
Historical Milestones
- Agricultural & Industrial Revolutions break 90\text{–}10; launch growth, middle class.
- Smith’s 1776 “Wealth of Nations” starts positive economics; advocates laissez-faire.
- Business cycle first recorded in Britain 1790s; Juglar 10-yr cycle.
- Great Depression (1929) births macroeconomics; USSR grows rapidly 1930s, stalls after 1960.
- China post-1978 market reforms ⇒ ≈9\% real growth.
Why Study Both Systems?
- Economic structure drives macro outcomes.
- Socialist ideas recur; understanding past avoids “re-inventing a broken wheel.”