The lecture series explores how psychologists measure and explain human behavior and psychological processes, ranging from behaviorist to cognitive perspectives.
The series covers:
Introduction to MBB-1 and the first assignment.
Classical and operant conditioning.
Social-cognitive learning and introduction to memory.
Short-term, working, and long-term memory, including amnesia.
What is Cognition?
Cognition encompasses activities of "the mind" involving the acquisition and use of knowledge.
Includes mental processes: perception, attention, memory, decision-making, reasoning, problem-solving, imagining, planning, and executing actions.
"The mind is a system that creates representations of the world so that we can act within it to achieve our goals" (Goldstein).
Mental Representation
Central to the study of cognition, referring to how information is encoded, stored, and reconstructed in our minds.
Representations can be mental imagery or abstract forms expressing complex relationships between concepts, using spatial relationships or symbolic languages.
Cognitive capacities: used for acquiring and processing information (learning) and storing it to inform future behavior (memory).
Cognitive states: attending, perceiving, remembering, intending, etc.
Cognitive psychology: study of cognitive states and their explanation of human behavior and mental experience.
Cognitive neuroscience: study of the neural mechanisms underlying cognitive capacities; increasingly intertwined with cognitive psychology.
Mind-body/mind-brain problem: Explaining how mental processes are created by physical neural states is a central challenge.
The Perceptual-Cognitive Cycle
Neisser (1976) defines cognition as "the activity of knowing: the acquisition, organization, and use of knowledge."
The perceptual-cognitive cycle explains how mental representations (schemas) are updated as we explore the world.
Experience integrates the perceptual present and cognitive past, implying an active, embodied, emotional agent embedded in the physical and socio-cultural world.
The sequential-cyclical process involves interdependence of brain, body, world, and mind.
Abstraction from reality and emotions is a key issue in AI.
Cognizers and Mental Representation
Cognizers mentally represent their world.
Example: mentally representing a goal to obtain an object from a location not in the immediate environment.
Example: A dog salivating upon hearing the sound of its treats being opened, representing a mental representation of food.
Measuring the Mind
Methods to measure internal mental states:
Subjective questionnaires.
Objective measures of behavioral responses to controlled stimuli to infer cognitive processes.
Correlating subjective ratings with objective behavioral responses.
Learning and Cognition explores the shift from Behaviorism to Cognitivism in psychology.
Classical Conditioning: From Pavlov to Watson
The lecture series traces the history of experimental psychology from theories focused on learned responses to environmental stimuli to a contemporary approach that includes internal mental processes.
A "both and" approach is needed.
Classical conditioning is a fundamental form of learning.
Ivan Pavlov's work influenced John Brodus Watson, who saw it as a model for studying human psychology using objective science by controlling observable stimuli and their effects.
Behaviorism eschewed internal mental processes, viewing learning as driven by external stimuli shaping behavioral responses.
Subsequent lectures consider the limitations and further developments in studying the mind beyond Behaviorism.
Learning Outcomes
Define learning, including non-associative and associative forms.
Apply knowledge to analyze new scenarios, generate hypotheses, and interpret graphs depicting classically conditioned responses.
Learning: Definition
Learning is demonstrated in the behavior of the learner; inferred from enduring changes in response to the environment based on past experiences.
Central to adaptation and survival, such as distinguishing edible from inedible foods or friends from enemies.
Learning is about prediction — predicting the future from past experiences to guide behavior.
Learning is the set of biological, cognitive and social processes through which organisms make meaning from their experiences, producing long-lasting changes in their behaviour, abilities, and knowledge
Learning helps us to predict the future from our past experiences and use these predictions to guide adaptive behaviors.
Foundations of Learning
Two fundamental forms of non-associative learning shared by all species: sensitization and habituation.
Sensitization: temporary state of heightened attention and responsivity to sudden events, creating an increased response to subsequent stimuli.
Habituation: gradual diminishing of attention and responsivity when a stimulus persists.
Aplysia is a sea slug used in Nobel prize-winning work by Eric Kandel.
Aplysia has defensive mechanisms: gill withdrawal reflex and inking reflex.
Reflexes are the basis for classical conditioning.
Kandel studied habituation and sensitization in Aplysia and described the neural basis of classical conditioning.
Aplysia learned to associate stimuli with electric shocks, preemptively withdrawing its gill.
Kandel mapped the neurophysiology of learning in Aplysia's nervous system (about 20,000 neurons).
Pavlov and Classical Conditioning
Pavlov was a Russian Physiologist studying digestion in dogs in the late 19th and early 20th century.
Classical conditioning is important for survival as it is shared by all living species.
At the heart of classical conditioning is its ability to allow us to predict the future.
"The normal animal must respond not only to stimuli which themselves bring immediate benefit or harm, but also to those that only signal the approach of these stimuli; though it is not the sight and sound of the beast of prey which is in itself harmful…..but its teeth and claws."
Conditioning: Learning Predictive Relationships
Classical conditioning is one form of associative learning.
Learning how events are related is key to learning beyond habituation and sensitization and is important for survival.
Conditioned learning processes are conserved across species.
It is critical to learn associations between stimuli that reliably predict biologically significant events and to learn adaptive responses to predictive stimuli.
Biologically significant stimuli relate to survival: defensive or appetitive reflex responses, stimuli that are inherently punishing (aversive) or rewarding (appetitive).
Unconditioned stimuli naturally produce an autonomic (involuntary) response, causal structure of the environment. "if X (conditioned stimulus), then Y" (unconditioned stimulus)
Conditioning is also called associative learning: learning associations (relationships) between stimuli, and/or between stimuli and behavioral responses.
Classical Conditioning Explained
Classical conditioning involves learning a predictive relationship between an originally neutral environmental event and a biologically significant event that naturally causes an autonomic reflex response.
The previously neutral event becomes meaningful, producing the autonomic reflex response on its own.
A classically conditioned response is a learned reflex response to a stimulus that would not usually cause it.
Example: salivation to the sound of a bell is a learned reflex response due to its association with food.
Pavlov's Dogs
Pavlov studied digestion in dogs, focusing on saliva production.
Dogs started to produce saliva automatically before food presentation, which intrigued Pavlov.
Dogs seemed to predict food presentation, with the salivation reflex occurring before the food stimulus.
Pavlov shifted his interest to how dogs learned to predict the future, hypothesizing that they associated signals that preceded the meat presentation.
Classical Conditioning Demonstration
Using a dog, Ollie, as an example to explain Pavlov's processes.
Pavlov controlled the stimuli before food, using a metronome's bell sound as a neutral stimulus.
The bell sound was presented before the food, which naturally causes a salivation reflex.
Pavlov aimed to see if the bell could cause salivation on its own through repeated association with food during learning, describing three phases.
Three Phases of Classical Conditioning
Before Conditioning:
A neutral stimulus that has not yet been associated with appetitive or aversive stimuli.
The innate reflex responses of the learner that occur to stimuli that are naturally rewarding (appetitive) or punishing (aversive or threatening).
During Conditioning:
Experiencing a predictive relationship between a neutral stimulus and a biologically relevant stimulus.
After Conditioning:
The previously neutral stimulus becomes able to produce a learned reflex response in preparation for (or expectancy of) a biologically relevant stimulus.
The Neutral Stimulus
Before conditioning, the sound of a bell does not cause salivation. The bell is initially neutral, not biologically significant.
We want to see if we can teach a dog to salivate to the sound of the bell on its own.
Unconditioned Stimulus and Response
Before conditioning, a dog has a natural reflex salivation response to the presentation of food.
Food is an unconditioned stimulus (UCS), and salivation is an unconditioned response (UCR).
The unconditioned stimulus is a biologically significant stimulus that naturally causes a reflex response.
The reflex response is an unconditioned response, which is unlearned or innate.
UCS + UCR = reflex
Conditioning Process
Conditioning involves 'acquisition trials': ring the bell, then present a treat.
Presenting the NS before the UCS is repeated over several trials.
Establishing a conditioned response requires presenting the bell sound just before giving food to produce the UCR, repeating trials in one session, and again after a delay.
Conditioned Response
Test whether conditioning has occurred by ringing the bell alone and measuring salivation.
A dog has established a conditioned salivation response when it salivates to the sound of the bell alone.
The bell becomes the conditioned stimulus (CS), and the salivation response to the bell is a conditioned response (CR).
Classical Conditioning Outcomes
The initially neutral stimulus becomes a conditioned stimulus.
The unconditioned response becomes a conditioned response.
Classical conditioning has occurred when:
The reflex salivation response occurs in response to the formerly neutral stimulus when presented on its own
Acquisition of a Classically Conditioned Response Graph
Each data point represents the strength of the conditioned salivation response when the bell is presented on it's own, as a function of the number of conditioning trials that have occurred.
On the Y axis we are measuring mls of saliva.
On the X axis is represented the number of conditioning trials prior to each test of the CS on its own.
Classical Conditioning Review
Learning a predictive relationship between an originally neutral environmental event and a biologically significant event that itself naturally causes an autonomic reflex response, so that the previously neutral event becomes a meaningful stimulus that produces the autonomic reflex response on its own.
Learning a predictive relationship between a neutral stimulus and an unconditioned stimulus (UCS) and its unconditioned response, so that the neutral stimulus becomes a conditioned stimulus that can cause a conditioned response (conditioned reflex) on its own.
Stimulus Generalization
Pavlov demonstrated that the classically conditioned salivation response would generalize (transfer) to other similar stimuli.
He called this stimulus generalization.
Stimulus Discrimination
Given that stimulus generalization occurs naturally – how could you then train an animal to produce the response only to a specific stimulus – say a particular tone of bell?
How could you train a dog to only salivate to the sound of one specific bell, and not to others?
That is, how could you train stimulus discrimination?
Extinction
How could you extinguish a dog’s conditioned salivation response?
What would the graph of extinction trials look like?
Spontaneous Recovery
Yes, we call this spontaneous recovery.
If you rest a dog after a series of extinction trials and then present the bell again, the conditioned response will return.
Extinction spaced over multiple sessions will gradually prevent spontaneous recovery (at least in contexts similar to the extinction context).
Rapid Reacquisition
A dog would re-learn the conditioned salivation response more quickly than he did the first time.
We call this rapid reacquisition.
Extinction Process Implications
What do spontaneous recovery and rapid reacquisition suggest about the extinction process?