APSC 169 L22 Course Recap - 28 November 2024

Page 17: Concurrent Engineering

  • Definition: Also known as "simultaneous engineering".

  • Contrast: Opposes Sequential Engineering or “over-the-wall” engineering.

  • Historical Context: Concept traceable back to the 1980s.

Page 18: Design Process Deviation

  • Key Change: Deviates from the traditional “over-the-wall” design process, integrating various stages such as:

    • Marketing

    • Research

    • Design

    • Manufacturing

    • Sales

Page 19: Claimed Advantages of Concurrent Engineering

  • Benefits:

    • Shorter lead time.

    • Improved communication and product quality.

    • Reduced design changes.

    • Ensures better management practices.

    • Reduced development costs.

    • Increased profit margins.

  • Source: Chikwendu, C. (2017). "Benefits and Barriers to Successful Concurrent Engineering Implementation".

Page 20: Design For X (DFX) Overview

  • Definition: Refers to design methods ensuring characteristic, function, or quality criteria in the final design.

  • Focus Areas in DFX:

    • Usability

    • Functionality

    • Manufacturability

    • Maintenance/serviceability

    • Environmental considerations.

  • Impact: These factors critically influence cost, safety, market acceptance, and commercial success.

Page 21: Challenges in DFX Implementation

  • Common Phenomenon: Enhancements in one design aspect may adversely affect another.

    • Example: Choosing a sterilizable material may necessitate incompatible packaging.

  • Satisficing Concept: Recognized by economist Herbert Simon, suggesting that optimal decisions are often satisfactory rather than perfect across multiple dimensions.

Page 22: Examples of Design For X

  • Key areas for DFX include:

    • Manufacture

    • Assembly

    • Maintenance

    • Environmental considerations

    • Reuse

    • Disposal

    • Recycling

    • Lifecycle.

Page 24: Intentional Design for Environment

  • Goals:

    • Minimize pollution.

    • Reduce mass cycle for products

    • Enhance energy efficiency.

    • Minimize waste.

    • Design for reduction, reuse, recycling (3Rs).

    • Reduce life cycle impact.

Pages 25 - 27: Final Exam Information

  • Course: APSC 169 Sustainable Engineering Design

  • Date: December 11, 2024

  • Instructions: Include name and student number.

Page 28: Exam Structure

  • Format: Multiple-choice questions (MCQs).

  • Instructions: Indicate the question paper version received.

Page 29: Exam Procedure

  • Do not open the booklet until instructed by the invigilator.

  • Marks: 50; Duration: 150 mins (2 hr 30 mins).

  • Immediate steps post-start: Verify all pages are present, enter identification details, and skim questions.

Pages 30 - 34: Academic Integrity and Exam Preparation

  • Prohibited Items: Unpermitted aids, cell phones, and smart devices.

  • Preparation Strategy:

    • Engage in class and grasp each slide's content.

    • Be prepared for new concepts, with about 20% requiring inference.

Page 36: Review Content

  • Recap of covered material and areas to focus on for comprehensive understanding.

Page 39: Design Cycle Steps Overview

  • Stages: Identify, Implement, Invent.

  • Identify: Empathize, Observe, Research stakeholders and project requirements.

Page 40: Inventing Concepts

  • Process: Ideation involves generating wide-ranging concepts followed by testing the minimum viable product.

Page 41: Implementation Strategies

  • Development: Formulate and execute an implementation strategy while seeking feedback from stakeholders.

Page 42: Iteration in Design Cycle

  • Iteration: Design process may always yield better designs, necessitating a halt for implementation.

Page 44: Need Statement Development

  • Format: One-sentence description addressing a specific problem.

    • Example: “A way to address (problem) in/for (population).”

Page 45: Solution Dependent vs. Independent Need Statements

  • Dependent Example: “Need sturdier foam earpieces for headphones.”

  • Independent Example: “Address short longevity and lack of comfort in headphones.”

Page 49: Scoping the Need Statement

  • Variations: Broaden or narrow the population scope based on contextual understanding.

Page 51: Scoping Implications

  • Broad Scope: Risk misidentifying niche markets.

  • Narrow Scope: Dangers missing larger opportunities; requires balance.

Page 52: Project Requirements Post-Need Definition

  • Components: Functions, objectives, constraints must be aligned with all potential solutions.

Page 56: Constraints in Design

  • Definition: External limits a project must adhere to, including economic, social, political, and regulatory requirements.

Page 72: Stakeholder Analysis

  • Steps: Identify stakeholders, assess their impact, interest, and power.

Page 80: Break Down Strategies for Designs

  • Functional Decomposition: Break down product's functionalities into manageable parts for solution exploration.

Page 86: Weighted Sum Evaluation Matrix for Solution Selection

  • Method: Common technique in engineering to evaluate and compare different solutions based on multiple criteria.

Page 88: Proof of Concept Process

  • Steps: Test risks in the solution, prototype, measure, and learn to iterate before finalizing a concept.

Page 90: Prototyping Categories

  • Categories: Works-like, Feels-like, Is-like, Looks-like, and Looks-and-Works-like models guiding early development decisions.

Page 92: Sustainability in Design

  • Focus: Integrating sustainability into the design process through systems thinking and lifecycle thinking principles.