Urban Geography Notes

Urban Geography

Focussing Questions

  • How did early models (Christaller’s, Hoyts’, Burgess’ and Adams’) help geographers understand cities?
  • What are some limitations of these models?
  • How did feminist geography influence geographers’ understanding of the city?
  • How did attention to ‘everyday life’ open up how geographers study and understand cities?

What is a City?

  • Big Things: Skyscrapers, ports, industrial complexes, hospitals, universities, shopping malls, box stores.
  • Lots of big networks: Motorways, mass transportation systems, underground networks (water, sewage, electricity, internet, gas).
  • Centres of: Administration, finance, commerce, education, health, transport.
  • And lots and lots of people.

Diversity of Cities

  • Examples: Mumbai vs Tokyo vs Auckland vs Lagos

Diversity within Cities

  • Socio-economic status, family history, stage of life.
  • Places we live and visit.
  • How we move around.
  • Daily schedules and rhythms.
  • Where and how we socialize.
  • Barriers and challenges.

How do Geographers Understand Cities?

  • Early Models (Big Theories):
    • Christaller’s central place theory (geographer – 1933).
      • Range – the maximum distance a consumer will travel for a particular good or services.
      • Threshold – the smallest number of consumers required to profitably supply a certain good or service.
    • Burgess – concentric zone model (sociologist - 1925).
      • In cities, groups compete for space and resources.
      • Results in a sorting of social groups along economic lines so that communities occupy distinctive zones.
    • Hoyt’s sector model (economist - 1939).
      • Places greater emphasis on the role of transportation.
      • Industrial sectors develop along river or rail routes.
      • High income residential sectors also grow in proximity to fastest transportation routes.
    • Adams – changes in transport influence urban form (geographer – 1970s).
      • Related stages in the development of transportation to changes in the residential structure of cities.

Limitations and Critiques of Early Models

  • Assumptions – flat land, equal distribution of resources, no river or coastline.
  • Based on studies of North American cities.
  • Soviet-era cities – large residential housing estates, limited retail and commercial land use, large public plazas and parks.
  • European cities often have medieval characteristics – city wall, historic core – church, marketplace, dense concentrations of buildings, irregular street patterns, low central city skyline.

Feminist Geography's Influence

  • Women and Geography study group (1985).
  • Drew attention to the effect of urban spatial structure on women, women’s employment, access to facilities.
  • Urban spatial structure – separation of home and work.
  • Division of labor (home – feminine – unpaid; work – male – waged).
  • Focus on smaller, day-to-day elements: shopping routines, household rhythms, life of public places, networks of friendships.

Everyday Life

  • Academic attention on the lived experience of being in a city.
  • Opens up the diversity of human experience (women's, children's, LGBTQ+, informal sector, socio-economic groups, ethnic groups).
  • Definition: The ordinary and regular practices that people engage in day in and day out.

Cities by Amin and Thrift

  • Cities as forces with complex networks.
  • Emphasis on: Infrastructural, administrative, relationships, and non-human elements.
  • Cities as ecologies (humans, buildings, rivers, rats, technologies, viruses, birds, cockroaches, lawns…).

Impact of Attention to ‘Everyday Life’

  • Led to people-centered urban planning focusing on walkability, accessibility, and livability.
  • Encouraged studies on street vendors, housing struggles, and community resilience.
  • Helped design cities that reflect diverse social needs rather than just economic efficiency.