Jim+Crow+America+_+post+Reconstruction+_+1877+to+1910s

Page 1: Introduction to Jim Crow

  • The Imperial Laundry Company enforced segregation with a sign stating they "WASH FOR WHITE PEOPLE ONLY" (1950).

  • Historical context of Jim Crow laws: 1876-1965, written and enforced predominantly by the Democratic Party.

  • Jim Crow America spans from 1877 to the 1960s, focusing mainly on the period around 1877-1900.

  • Notable cultural reference: The minstrel song "Jim Crow" became synonymous with racial segregation policies.

  • Ernest Hogan, a composer, wrote about the racial misunderstandings prevalent in this era.

Page 2: Institutionalization of Jim Crow

  • Jim Crow period characterized as the “Age of Segregation”; it marked the establishment of a racial caste system.

  • Origin and timeline: Started in 1877 during Rutherford B. Hayes presidency, as a response to Reconstruction and the waning influence of the 14th and 15th Amendments.

  • Temporary black codes (1865-66) re-emerged as Jim Crow laws, which were named after a popular minstrel show.

  • Predominantly Southern laws, as the North had fewer African American populations and less segregation.

Page 3: Jim Crow Etiquette

  • Stetson Kennedy's guide outlines behavioral rules for African Americans when interacting with Whites:

    • Never accuse, imply falsehoods, or suggest inferiority about Whites.

    • Avoid displaying superior knowledge or intelligence.

    • Prohibit cursing or laughing derisively at Whites.

    • Do not comment on a White person's appearance, particularly females.

  • The creation of Jim Crow as a racial caste system was influenced by Thomas Rice’s 1828 performance of “Jim Crow.”

Page 4: Impact of Jim Crow

  • Jim Crow laws and societal norms required African Americans to show continued deference to Whites in all aspects of life.

  • Breaching these segregated customs could result in severe consequences, including lynching.

Page 5: Advocates and Beliefs

  • White proponents of Jim Crow viewed racial hierarchy as a natural state of inherent inequality rather than a societal construct.

  • Justifications for persistent inequality: Beliefs in biological inferiority of African Americans and natives.

  • Descriptive warnings by advocates against the “mongrelization” of the white race.

Page 6: Violence and Social Control

  • Jim Crow's enforcement was heavily supported by violence and intimidation.

  • Violating social norms could result in job loss, threats, and even fatal repercussions.

  • The racially biased justice system often overlooked or condoned lynchings, which were seen as necessary for maintaining order.

  • Ida B. Wells was a prominent figure fighting against lynchings and advocating for civil rights.

Page 7: Challenges to Voting Rights

  • Barriers to African American voting included:

    • Poll Taxes: Fees that many African Americans could not afford.

    • Literacy Tests: Discriminatory measures ensuring many could not pass the tests.

  • Section 1 of the 15th Amendment explicitly prohibits voting discrimination based on race but was routinely violated.

  • The Grandfather Clause allowed Whites to bypass tests if their ancestors had voted before the Civil War, further disenfranchising blacks.

Page 8: Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)

  • The case arose when Homer Plessy, a man of mixed race, tested Louisiana’s segregation law by sitting in a whites-only railroad car.

  • The legal strategy aimed to challenge racial classifications and argue against the violation of the 14th Amendment’s equal protection.

Page 9: Constitutional Question

  • The fundamental issue was whether segregated train compartments violated the 14th Amendment guarantees.

  • The 14th Amendment states that no state should abridge citizens' rights to equal protection under the law.

Page 10: Majority Opinion

  • Authored by Justice Brown, the majority upheld the conviction of Plessy, maintaining that segregation did not violate equal protection.

  • Argument: The 14th Amendment was not intended to obliterate racial distinctions; hence, social equality was not mandated.

  • This ruling legitimized segregation, providing legal cover for existing Jim Crow laws.

Page 11: The "Separate but Equal" Doctrine

  • The case led to the establishment of the "separate but equal" doctrine as a legal justification for racial segregation.

  • While the Louisiana law claimed equality between facilities, the Court did not address the actual equality of amenities in their ruling.

  • The Court ruled that a state could enforce segregation without infringing on constitutional equality as understood in legal terms.

Page 12: Dissenting Opinion by Justice Harlan

  • Justice Harlan argued that laws distinguishing citizens infringed upon personal liberties guaranteed by the 14th Amendment.

  • He emphasized the legal contradictions imposed by the majority opinion, which opposed the spirit of rights established after the Civil War.

  • Harlan foresaw the detrimental societal impacts of segregation, similar to those seen in the Dred Scott decision.

Page 13: Aftermath of Plessy

  • Following Plessy, states utilized its precedent to sidestep constitutional responsibilities to African Americans.

  • The decision initiated a prolonged period of unchallenged Jim Crow laws until the civil rights movement gained momentum in the mid-20th century.

  • Landmark cases like Loving v. Virginia (1967) began to dismantle racist laws.

Page 14: Resistance to Jim Crow

  • Despite some reformers in the Progressive Era distancing from black communities, organizations like the NAACP emerged in 1909 to combat Jim Crow.

  • The NAACP’s pivotal victory in 1954 with Brown v. Board of Education marked significant progress in civil rights activism.

  • W.E.B. Du Bois was instrumental in founding the NAACP, emphasizing the fight against racial injustice.