Understanding various measures of muscle performance provides insights into clinical utility and research applications.
Definition: A technique to measure muscle activation timing and magnitude.
Types:
Surface EMG: Non-invasive, records electrical activity from the skin surface.
Intramuscular EMG: More invasive, provides localized activity data.
Limitations:
EMG does not measure muscle force or strength directly.
Not always practical in clinical settings due to equipment requirements.
Overview: Muscle force quantification is more applicable in research settings, especially in vitro.
Formula: Requires precise measurements of lever arms related to the load and the muscle.
Challenges exist in vivo due to joint rotation complexities and multi-plane movements.
Function: Devices used to measure muscle force and torque.
Gold Standard:
Considered the best method for measuring various performance metrics (e.g., concentric and eccentric contractions).
Biodex System: Large, expensive, predominantly found in research environments.
Handheld Dynamometers: More economical, commonly used in clinical practice (e.g., hand therapy).
Expensive Equipment: While providing accurate measures, they are not always accessible in clinical settings.
Free Weight Assessments:
One Rep Max (1RM)
10 Rep Maximum (10RM)
Repetitions until muscle failure
Useful for quantifiable strength measures in clinical practice.
Manual Muscle Testing (MMT):
Widely used assessment technique across physiotherapy settings.
Involves the Oxford scale for grading muscle strength but lacks quantifiability and reliability compared to dynamometers.