AP EURO WHOLE CH 15 Cody Gaa

Social Crises, War, and Rebellions

  • Economic contraction began in the 1620s, continuing through the 1630s and 1640s, marked by widespread inflation and a decline in trade and industrial output.

    • Decline of silver imports from the Americas worsened economic recession, particularly in the Mediterranean Sea area, due to reduced access to capital for investment and trade.

    • Italy, the industrial and financial center during the Renaissance, became economically stagnant due to Spanish dominance, competition from other European powers, and shifted trade routes.

    • Spain's economy also failed significantly by the 1640s, exacerbated by costly wars, declining silver revenues, and an expulsion of skilled laborers like the Moriscos.

  • Population statistics revealed declining conditions with estimated population dropping from approximately 85 million by 1600.

    • Post-1620 population leveling off and a decline noted by 1650, especially in Central and Southern Europe. This demographic stagnation was a stark contrast to earlier periods of growth.

    • Only Dutch, English, and French populations experienced growth during this time, partially due to more resilient economic structures and less direct involvement in the devastations of the Thirty Years' War.

  • Ongoing impacts of historical adversities
    —war, famine, and plague—on population, leading to cycles of depopulation and slow recovery. Specific outbreaks of plague, like the Great Plague of London in 1665, continued to ravage urban centers.

  • Climate changes, specifically the "little ice age" (a period of colder temperatures and increased storminess from the early 14th to mid-19th centuries), further affected agricultural output, leading to severe crop failures and widespread famines across the continent.

The Witchcraft Craze

Focus Question: What does the witchcraft craze tell us about European society in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries?

  • The heights of witchcraft hysteria in Europe (sixteenth and seventeenth centuries), fueled by religious zeal, social anxieties, and legal reforms that made accusations easier.

    • Trials held across England, Scotland, Switzerland, Germany, France, and America, with localized outbreaks often triggered by economic hardship or communal conflict.

    • Estimates suggest upwards of 100,000 people prosecuted on witchcraft charges, with a significant number, sometimes 50%, resulting in executions, often by burning.

    • Historical context of witchcraft
      —associated with devilry since the Inquisition’s establishment in the thirteenth century, leading to a more systematic pursuit of alleged witches.

  • Accused typically coerced into confessions through torture, often claiming allegiance to the devil, participating in sabbaths, or engaging in sexual acts with demons.

    • Common accusations included causing property damage and livestock harm, spreading disease, or inflicting misfortune on neighbors, reflecting everyday fears and superstitions.

  • Various factors contributing to the witchcraft frenzy:

    • Religious tensions (areas divided by Protestant vs. Catholic rivalries). Both sides scapegoated witchcraft, viewing it as a manifestation of the devil's work and a threat to communal piety.

    • Social turmoil amid economic changes and declines in community values, where traditional communal support systems weakened and societal anxieties heightened.

    • Older women, often impoverished and marginalized, became prime targets for accusations. They were often widows, spinsters, or those with unique customs, seen as vulnerable targets and easy scapegoats for misfortune, embodying societal misogyny and fear of independent women.

The Thirty Years' War

Focus Question: How did the peace of Westphalia mark the end of the era of religious war and lessen Habsburg authority?

Focus Question: To what extent were the Thirty Years' War and the English Civil War continuations of the religious conflicts of the past century?

  • Background of the war rooted in Catholic vs. Calvinist conflicts, particularly in the Holy Roman Empire; evolved into political struggles for dominance among European powers, primarily the Bourbon dynasty of France and the Habsburg dynasties of Spain and Austria. The immediate spark was the Defenestration of Prague in 1618.

  • Divided into four phases: Bohemian, Danish, Swedish, Franco-Swedish:

    1. Bohemian Phase (1618-1625): Started with Protestant revolt in Bohemia against Habsburg Emperor Ferdinand II's attempts to impose Catholicism, leading to the victory of imperial forces at the Battle of White Mountain in 1620. This crushed Bohemian Protestantism and allowed the Habsburgs to consolidate power.

    2. Danish Phase (1625-1629): King Christian IV of Denmark intervened on behalf of Protestants and to expand his own territorial influence; imperial forces further extended Catholic control under the brilliant but ruthless general Albrecht von Wallenstein. This phase saw a peak in Habsburg power and culminated in the Edict of Restitution (1629), attempting to restore all Catholic lands lost since 1552.

    3. Swedish Phase (1630-1635): Marked by Gustavus Adolphus's intervention, the Protestant King of Sweden, who was supported by France. He introduced innovative military tactics, characterized by initial Protestant victories (e.g., Battle of Breitenfeld), but ultimately leading to defeats and Adolphus's death at the Battle of Lützen (1632), diminishing Sweden's aggressive expansionist goals.

    4. Franco-Swedish Phase (1635-1648): France, under Cardinal Richelieu, openly allied with Sweden against Habsburg forces. This phase was primarily a French-Habsburg struggle, significantly reshaping power dynamics in Europe and ensuring that the war continued to weaken the Habsburgs even after their initial religious goals had largely been met.

  • Outcomes of the war:

    • Peace of Westphalia (1648) confirmed religious autonomy of individual German states (including Calvinism), granted independence to the Dutch Republic and Swiss Confederacy, and France gained territories (e.g., Alsace).

    • Restructured the balance of power, greatly diminishing the Holy Roman Empire, elevating France, and setting the foundation for modern state sovereignty where individual states determined their own religion and foreign policy, ending large-scale religious wars in Europe.

The Practice of Absolutism in Western Europe

Focus Question: How did the concept of absolutism influence the rulers of Europe, and what were the effects on the nobility?

  • Absolutism defined as sovereign power resting in a king claiming divine right, meaning the monarch held ultimate authority and was accountable only to God, not to any earthly institution or legislative body.tism

    • Key theorists include Jacques Bossuet, who in Politics Drawn from the Very Words of Holy Scripture, advocated divine government structure representative of God's order, arguing that kings were God's lieutenants on Earth and their power was absolute and sacred.

Absolute Monarchy in France

Focus Question: What did Louis XIV hope to accomplish in his domestic and foreign policies to what extent did he succeed?

  • Examined through Louis XIV's reign (1643-1715), often cited as the epitome of absolute monarchy, where royal power was centralized and state control expanded.

    • Cardinal Richelieu: Chief minister under Louis XIII; strengthened royal authority against Huguenots (by destroying their fortified towns but allowing religious freedom) and by systematically weakening the power of the nobility (e.g., banning private duels, destroying castles of dissident lords). He also established the intendant system, sending royal officials to provinces to oversee administration, justice, and taxation, thereby centralizing power.

    • Cardinal Mazarin: Continued Richelieu’s policies while managing noble discontent through the Fronde (1648-1653), a widespread rebellion by nobles, townspeople, and Parliament against royal authority and high taxes. Mazarin's successful suppression of the Fronde deeply influenced the young Louis XIV, making him wary of Paris and the nobility, and determined to never repeat such an experience.

  • Reign of Louis XIV:

    • Centralizing authority at Versailles, making the palace a symbol of royal power and a means to control the nobility. Nobles were required to live at court for parts of the year, participating in elaborate daily rituals, distracting them from real political power and creating a hierarchy dependent on royal favor.

    • War expenditures and lavish royal expenses: Driven by military goals (e.g., War of Devolution, Dutch War, War of the Spanish Succession) to expand France and establish its dominance in Europe. These costly wars, alongside the opulent court life, often hindered financial stability; reliance on finance minister Jean-Baptiste Colbert's mercantilist policies attempted to offset these costs by promoting exports, imposing tariffs, and building infrastructure.

    • Internal administration challenges: Despite efforts to create a unified state, local and regional governance often resisted royal edicts, highlighting limits of absolutist rule. Provincial parlements (high courts) had the right of remonstrance, allowing them to register or refuse royal decrees, which sometimes led to significant clashes over royal authority and local privileges. This illustrated that even an absolute monarch relied on local cooperation to implement policies effectively.

Absolutism in Eastern Europe: The Example of Russia

Focus Question: How did Peter modernize Russia and in what ways did Russia remain traditionally bound?

  • Peter the Great (reigned 1682-1725) sought to westernize and modernize Russia, transforming its political, social, and military structures.

    • Military Reforms: Created a standing army and modern navy based on European models; introduced conscription for peasants and lifelong service requirements for nobles (Table of Ranks).

    • Administrative Reforms: Replaced the Duma (council of boyars) with a Senate; divided Russia into provinces and districts for more effective governance and tax collection; established colleges (bureaus) to oversee specific functions of government.

    • Church Control: Abolished the Patriarchate and established the Holy Synod, effectively placing the Russian Orthodox Church under state control.

    • Economic Development: Encouraged mercantilist policies, promoted mining and manufacturing, and built new cities like St. Petersburg (his "window to the West"), relocating the capital there.

    • Social Changes: Emphasized education for nobles, required them to dress in Western styles and shave their beards, aimed to break traditional boyar power and create a loyal service nobility. Women also gained more social freedom compared to traditional Muscovite society.

  • Ways Russia remained traditionally bound:

    • Serfdom: Peter's reforms solidified rather than abolished serfdom, tying peasants more firmly to the land and their landowners to support the state and army. Serfs were essentially state property or linked to the nobles who served the state.

    • Autocratic Rule: Despite westernizing reforms, the fundamental nature of Russian government remained an autocracy, with Peter exercising absolute, undisputed power, often through brutal means.

    • Cultural Divide: While the nobility adopted Western customs, the vast majority of the Russian population (peasants) remained deeply conservative and tied to traditional Russian Orthodox culture and practices.

    • Expansionist Tendencies: Continued traditional Russian expansionist foreign policy, particularly towards the Baltic Sea and against the Ottoman Empire.

Limited Monarchy and Republics

Focus Question: How did the fight for power between parliament and the king lead to the English Civil War, ultimately to the formation of the new government?

  • James I and his belief in divine right alienated Parliament; he engaged in conflicts over finances, foreign policy, and religion. Conflicts escalated with Charles I, who also asserted divine right and attempted to rule without Parliament, especially during his "Personal Rule" (1629-1640).

    • Petition of Right (1628): Asserted limits to royal power, including prohibitions on taxation without Parliamentary consent, arbitrary imprisonment, quartering of soldiers, and use of martial law. Charles I initially accepted it but later dissolved Parliament and ignored its provisions.

  • English Civil War (1642-1651) emerged, driven by ideological divisions between Parliament (Puritans, gentry, merchants, known as Roundheads, led by Oliver Cromwell's New Model Army) and monarchy (Anglicans, nobility, known as Cavaliers). This led to the execution of Charles I in 1649 after his defeat, and the establishment of the Commonwealth under Cromwell, a military dictatorship (Protectorate).

  • Restoration of the monarchy with Charles II (1660) brought back limited monarchy principles, but tensions over religion and royal power continued. The Glorious Revolution (1688) saw James II deposed and William and Mary enthroned, leading to the Bill of Rights in 1689, cementing Parliamentary authority in governance. This document established parliamentary supremacy, guaranteed fundamental rights, and prohibited a standing army without Parliament's consent, effectively creating a constitutional monarchy.

The Flourishing of European Culture

  • The Baroque style emerged amidst absolutism characterized by grandeur, dramatic movement, and emotional intensity in art, prominent in works by artists like Peter Paul Rubens (known for his dynamic religious and mythological scenes), Gian Lorenzo Bernini (famous for his sculpture like Ecstasy of Saint Teresa and architectural designs like St. Peter's Square), and later, Dutch realistic depictions by Rembrandt (master of light and shadow, exploring human emotion in portraits and biblical scenes).

  • The literary scene flourished, with notable figures such as William Shakespeare (English playwright, whose works reflect humanism and national identity) and Lope de Vega (Spanish playwright, prolific in drama, reflecting national pride and Catholic themes) highlighted cultural developments reflective of national identity and regional tensions. French classical drama (Racine, Molière) also rose, often patronized by the monarch.

  • The transition led to a shift towards secularization in European society, influenced heavily by the Scientific Revolution and the growing emphasis on human reason, moving away from purely religious interpretations of the world.

Artistic Movements

  • Mannerism: Reflecting anxiety and chaos post-Renaissance through distorted forms, elongated figures, and emotional depth, exemplified by artists like El Greco.

  • Baroque Art: Known for its richness, dramatic contrasts, elaborate ornamentation, and often grandiose scale, appealing to both the emotional intensity of the Catholic Reformation and the desires of absolute monarchs for visual splendor and expressions of power.

  • Dutch Realism: Emphasized everyday life and urban middle-class experiences, diverging from religious and monarchical themes predominant in other regions. Artists like Vermeer and Steen depicted domestic scenes, portraits, and still lifes, catering to a wealthy merchant class.

Key Terms

  • Absolutism: Centralized governance controlled by monarchs validated by divine right; the ultimate authority in the state rested in the hands of a king who claimed to rule by God's will.

  • Divine-right monarchy: Ideology asserting monarchs derive authority directly from God, making them accountable only to God, not to their subjects or representative bodies.

  • Intendants: Royal officials in France representing the crown's interests in provinces; they were crucial for centralizing royal power by acting as the king's eyes and ears, overseeing justice, finance, and policing.

  • Parlements: Provincial high courts in France that sometimes resisted royal decrees by exercising their right of remonstrance, often defending local privileges against monarchical centralizing efforts.

  • Boyars: Russian nobility that held significant power and influence, specifically in Muscovy, before being systematically curbed by tsars like Ivan the Terrible and Peter the Great.

  • Mannerism and Baroque: Artistic movements reflecting societal tensions and political artworks, where Baroque was more emotional, dramatic, and grandeur-focused, and Mannerism focused on deliberate stylization, artificiality, and distorted forms often expressing a sense of unease

Focus Question: What does the witchcraft craze tell us about European society in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries?

  • The witchcraft hysteria, fueled by religious zeal, social anxieties, and legal reforms, tells us that European society was grappling with significant turmoil. Trials across many countries and high execution rates reveal deep-seated fears and superstitions. The association of witchcraft with devilry, systematic pursuit of alleged witches, and coerced confessions through torture highlight a society prone to scapegoating.

    • Common accusations (property damage, livestock harm, disease) reflect everyday fears. Religious tensions (Protestant vs. Catholic) often intensified this, and societal turmoil from economic changes and declining community values further heightened anxieties. Older, impoverished, and marginalized women were frequently targeted, revealing pervasive societal misogyny and fear of independent women. Furthermore, the witch hunts serve as a poignant reminder of the dangers of mass hysteria and the consequences of collective fear, where rational discourse is overshadowed by superstition and paranoia.

Focus Question: How did the peace of Westphalia mark the end of the era of religious war and lessen Habsburg authority?

  • The Peace of Westphalia (1648) ended the era of large-scale religious wars by confirming the religious autonomy of individual German states, explicitly including Calvinism. This allowed states to determine their own religion and foreign policy, shifting away from a continent-wide struggle over religious uniformity. It greatly diminished the Holy Roman Empire and lessened Habsburg authority by granting independence to the Dutch Republic and Swiss Confederacy, and elevating France as a dominant power, thereby restructuring the balance of power in Europe.

Focus Question: To what extent were the Thirty Years' War and the English Civil War continuations of the religious conflicts of the past century?

  • Thirty Years' War: The war was deeply rooted in Catholic vs. Calvinist conflicts, particularly in the Holy Roman Empire, starting with the Protestant revolt in Bohemia. Early phases saw clear religious motivations (e.g., Edict of Restitution attempting to restore Catholic lands). However, it evolved into political struggles for dominance among European powers (Bourbon vs. Habsburg), showing a transition where religious antagonisms became intertwined with and often subservient to state power politics.

  • English Civil War: The war was heavily influenced by religious divisions; Parliament was largely supported by Puritans and the monarchy by Anglicans. Tensions over foreign policy toward Catholic powers, parliamentary demands for religious reforms, and disputes over the King's authority over the Church of England demonstrate a strong continuation of religious conflict shaping political and social upheaval.

Focus Question: How did the concept of absolutism influence the rulers of Europe, and what were the effects on the nobility?

  • Influence on Rulers: Absolutism led rulers to believe they held sovereign power derived from divine right, making them accountable only to God. This concept, championed by theorists like Jacques Bossuet, justified the monarch's ultimate authority over all earthly institutions. Rulers sought to centralize power and expand state control, viewing themselves as God's representatives.

  • Effects on Nobility: Absolutism systematically weakened the power of the nobility. In France, Cardinal Richelieu curbed noble power by destroying fortified towns and banning private duels. Louis XIV further controlled the nobility by requiring them to reside at Versailles, engaging them in elaborate court rituals, and making their status dependent on royal favor, thereby reducing their independent political influence and turning them into symbols of royal authority.

Focus Question: What did Louis XIV hope to accomplish in his domestic and foreign policies to what extent did he succeed?

  • Domestic Policies: Louis XIV aimed to centralize royal power and enhance state control, deeply influenced by the Fronde, which made him wary of noble dissent. He largely succeeded in this, making Versailles the center of royal power and a tool for controlling the nobility. However, internal administration faced challenges from provincial parlements that sometimes resisted royal decrees, indicating limits to absolute control and the ongoing need for local cooperation.

  • Foreign Policies: Louis XIV's goal was to expand France's borders and establish its dominance in Europe through costly wars (e.g., War of Devolution, War of the Spanish Succession). While these wars did elevate France’s status as a major European power, they also led to immense financial strain, despite the mercantilist policies of his finance minister Jean-Baptiste Colbert.

Focus Question: How did Peter modernize Russia and in what ways did Russia remain traditionally bound?

  • Modernization: Peter the Great actively modernized Russia through extensive reforms: creating a standing army and modern navy based on European models, replacing the Duma with a Senate, dividing Russia into provinces, establishing the Holy Synod to control the Church, promoting mercantilist economic policies, founding St. Petersburg, and mandating Western dress and education for nobles to break traditional boyar power.

  • Traditionally Bound: Despite these efforts, Russia remained traditionally bound in several key ways. Peter's reforms solidified serfdom to support the state and army, tying peasants more firmly to the land. The fundamental nature of Russian government remained an autocracy, with Peter exercising absolute and often brutal power. A significant cultural divide persisted, with the Westernized nobility contrasting sharply with the conservative, traditional Russian Orthodox majority of the peasantry. Furthermore, Russia continued its traditional expansionist foreign policy.

Focus Question: How did the fight for power between parliament and the king lead to the English Civil War, ultimately to the formation of the new government?

  • Fight for Power to Civil War: The struggle began with James I's belief in divine right, which alienated Parliament over issues like finance, foreign policy, and religion. This intensified under Charles I, who also asserted divine right and attempted to rule without Parliament during his "Personal Rule," and initially accepted but then ignored the Petition of Right (1628). These escalating conflicts between the monarchy's absolute claims and Parliament's demands for limitations on royal power directly led to the outbreak of the English Civil War.

  • Formation of New Government: The Civil War resulted in the defeat and execution of Charles I, leading to the establishment of the Commonwealth under Oliver Cromwell, which became a military dictatorship (Protectorate). After the Restoration of the monarchy with Charles II, tensions over religion and royal power continued. The Glorious Revolution (1688) saw James II deposed and William and Mary enthroned, leading to the Bill of Rights in 1689. This document cemented Parliamentary supremacy, guaranteed fundamental rights, and prohibited a standing army without Parliament's consent, effectively creating a constitutional monarchy.


Ergot - a grain that makes people act crazy when they digest it.

40 - 50,000 people were executed during the which craft.