class 2 history of political ideologies
chapter 1 The unraveling of the medieval order (1450-1650)
common thread, through the trends = emergence of capitalism
renaissance: rebirth of classical antiquity (Romans, Greeks)
new view on men, life and society
groundwork for enlightenment
gradually view on men central (not church/God), Curiosity to understand the world
renaissance: 2 phases:
rediscovery ancient Greek/Roman past
more future oriented, empirical
scientific progress and gradual emancipation of politics
Leonardo Da Vinci:
the logical (the exact, math) and experimental (empirical, the actual): scientific method
changing economic relations in a divided Italy (city-states)
mercantilism: the sovereign had the task of developing the nation’s income; maximize the exports and minimize the imports for an economy (so use the country’s resources)
emancipation and secularization (city-states no longer led by church/clergy, still important though, but by men with vision)
Nicollo Machiavelli:
book Il Principe: analysis of politics as art without morality and religion
rejected morality as basis politics, introduced more scientific view on human social behaviour
wanted to know how politics functioned
secularization of politics (≠ anti-religiousness)
2 criticisms on church:
undermined religous belief by bad conduct
secular power popes + politics to which it leads prevents unification of Italy
~scientific method = groundwork later scientific politcal approach
book la raison d’état: all means legitimate, if necessary
the end justifies the means
strong army very important, also an army motivated to fight for the state not because they get a paycheck
when people want freedom, they mean security, inviolability of private property = regulation needed
better to be feared than loved: you have control over who fears you = popular machiavellism
Thomas More:
book Utopia:
part 1: description social and economic changes in England (capitalism)
part 2: description of the ideal society (positive mirror image of England at that time)
Utopianism; rejection of the existing, unjust order on religious and/or moral grounds, projection of an ideal into another, imaginary world
end catholic hegemony: reformation and counterreformation
Luther: humanism, religious liberation of man (= strong government, not freedom)
1517: these of indulgence (rebelled against these indulgences, paying for forgiveness sins, you don’t need church (institution) if you have faith, direct relationship with God)
Calvin: turned his back to the church
man was helpless creature in face of God’s omnipotence
human predestination: assumed man’s fate fixed, he couldn’t do anything about it (God’s will) => seek signs of God’s favor
moved to geneva, commercial city, founded a theocracy there
government 2 parts: consistory (reponsible for morality) and ministry (spread Calvin’s teachings + acted as courts)
profit result of hard work (God’s will), wealth must be invested usefully = early capitalism economic order
social inequality but equality for the law
colonial encounters: dispute of Valladolid
1550-1555: how should Spain wage war on the American continent and spread catholicism? → actually question of humanity of the indigenous peoples; moral and theological debate anchored in the economic exploitation of the colonies
first argument about handling indigenous people; underlying economic motivation
Sepulveda:
brutal subjugation and christianization allowed
indigenous people are idolators; enslaved by nature, practiced human sacrifice, cannibalism and sodomy → wars had to be fought to eradicate these crimes against nature
natural slavery (Aristotle)
excessive force to convert indigenous people
de las Casas:
against use of force to bring christianity
didn’t deny natural slavery but indigenous peoles weren’t Aristotle’s barbarians → no forced christianization by war
war against heretics and infidels was justified but not against the indigenous peoples because they weren’t heretics who needed to be punished
Portuguese had the idea of kidnapping Africans to the Americas to work in place of the indigenous people (who fled and died a lot), based on idea of natural slavery (Africans naturally inferior)
conquistadores; encomienda system (slavery)
slavery in exchange for the “gift” of catholicism
it kicked off soread capitalism, slavery and racism
the glorious revolution
capitalist changes in Britain → political & constitutional conflict
1629-1660
King Charles I: conflict with parliament (puritans) over limitation king’s power; he disbanded parliament: realised he needed it
parliament (puritans who targeted Roman catholic church) listed objections, king didn’t do shit as reaction, leading to 1st and 2nd civil war
Olivier Cromwell:
questioned king’s absolute power, because it endangered private property
he established the New Model army
groups with slightly different ideas and levels of radicalism develop
the Levellers:
people’s sovereignty (the people = not workers class, of course white men, not beggers/unemployed, not women/children)
representation as an idea
defended private property
anti-normandism (royal family), against institutionalized church
the Diggers:
economic equality
women still inferior, but foundation feminism laid by Mary Astell
scientific developments and new insights:
Bacon: observation and experiment as the basic of knowledge
Hobbes: dynamic view of man
authoritarian state authority
state of nature: human nature, self-realization, selfishness → he thought back to human in society without authority, leads to…
… homo-homini-lupus society → every man for himself, competition and combat
unconditional social contract (people give up part freedom to the leader (called Leviathan) in exchange for security
impose authority through monopoly legitimate force, take care of poor, religious/moral rules pushed aside (= state religion)
common wealth, administration, law and order, poor people’s welfare responsibility leader
Descartes: reason as a possibility of knowledge (I know therefore I am)
de Spinoza: God determined by reason
rationalist
combined reason and religion
break with medieval philosophy
God’s understanding according to reasonable understanding
selfishness of man can only be given up by the love of God, not by a social contract => taking away freedom from man doesn’t take away their selfishness, they’ll still fight amongst each other
man is selfish = power not in hands of 1 man
laid groundwork ideas of democracy