class 2 history of political ideologies

chapter 1 The unraveling of the medieval order (1450-1650)

common thread, through the trends = emergence of capitalism

renaissance: rebirth of classical antiquity (Romans, Greeks)

  • new view on men, life and society

  • groundwork for enlightenment

  • gradually view on men central (not church/God), Curiosity to understand the world

renaissance: 2 phases:

  1. rediscovery ancient Greek/Roman past

  2. more future oriented, empirical

scientific progress and gradual emancipation of politics

  • Leonardo Da Vinci:

    • the logical (the exact, math) and experimental (empirical, the actual): scientific method

    • changing economic relations in a divided Italy (city-states)

    • mercantilism: the sovereign had the task of developing the nation’s income; maximize the exports and minimize the imports for an economy (so use the country’s resources)

    • emancipation and secularization (city-states no longer led by church/clergy, still important though, but by men with vision)

  • Nicollo Machiavelli:

    • book Il Principe: analysis of politics as art without morality and religion

    • rejected morality as basis politics, introduced more scientific view on human social behaviour

    • wanted to know how politics functioned

    • secularization of politics (≠ anti-religiousness)

    • 2 criticisms on church:

      • undermined religous belief by bad conduct

      • secular power popes + politics to which it leads prevents unification of Italy

    • ~scientific method = groundwork later scientific politcal approach

    • book la raison d’état: all means legitimate, if necessary

      • the end justifies the means

      • strong army very important, also an army motivated to fight for the state not because they get a paycheck

      • when people want freedom, they mean security, inviolability of private property = regulation needed

    • better to be feared than loved: you have control over who fears you = popular machiavellism

  • Thomas More:

    • book Utopia:

      • part 1: description social and economic changes in England (capitalism)

      • part 2: description of the ideal society (positive mirror image of England at that time)

    • Utopianism; rejection of the existing, unjust order on religious and/or moral grounds, projection of an ideal into another, imaginary world

end catholic hegemony: reformation and counterreformation

  • Luther: humanism, religious liberation of man (= strong government, not freedom)

    • 1517: these of indulgence (rebelled against these indulgences, paying for forgiveness sins, you don’t need church (institution) if you have faith, direct relationship with God)

  • Calvin: turned his back to the church

    • man was helpless creature in face of God’s omnipotence

    • human predestination: assumed man’s fate fixed, he couldn’t do anything about it (God’s will) => seek signs of God’s favor

    • moved to geneva, commercial city, founded a theocracy there

      • government 2 parts: consistory (reponsible for morality) and ministry (spread Calvin’s teachings + acted as courts)

    • profit result of hard work (God’s will), wealth must be invested usefully = early capitalism economic order

    • social inequality but equality for the law

colonial encounters: dispute of Valladolid

1550-1555: how should Spain wage war on the American continent and spread catholicism? → actually question of humanity of the indigenous peoples; moral and theological debate anchored in the economic exploitation of the colonies

  • first argument about handling indigenous people; underlying economic motivation

  • Sepulveda:

    • brutal subjugation and christianization allowed

    • indigenous people are idolators; enslaved by nature, practiced human sacrifice, cannibalism and sodomy → wars had to be fought to eradicate these crimes against nature

    • natural slavery (Aristotle)

    • excessive force to convert indigenous people

  • de las Casas:

    • against use of force to bring christianity

    • didn’t deny natural slavery but indigenous peoles weren’t Aristotle’s barbarians → no forced christianization by war

    • war against heretics and infidels was justified but not against the indigenous peoples because they weren’t heretics who needed to be punished

    • Portuguese had the idea of kidnapping Africans to the Americas to work in place of the indigenous people (who fled and died a lot), based on idea of natural slavery (Africans naturally inferior)

  • conquistadores; encomienda system (slavery)

  • slavery in exchange for the “gift” of catholicism

  • it kicked off soread capitalism, slavery and racism

the glorious revolution

  • capitalist changes in Britain → political & constitutional conflict

  • 1629-1660

  • King Charles I: conflict with parliament (puritans) over limitation king’s power; he disbanded parliament: realised he needed it

    • parliament (puritans who targeted Roman catholic church) listed objections, king didn’t do shit as reaction, leading to 1st and 2nd civil war

  • Olivier Cromwell:

    • questioned king’s absolute power, because it endangered private property

    • he established the New Model army

    • groups with slightly different ideas and levels of radicalism develop

  • the Levellers:

    • people’s sovereignty (the people = not workers class, of course white men, not beggers/unemployed, not women/children)

    • representation as an idea

    • defended private property

    • anti-normandism (royal family), against institutionalized church

  • the Diggers:

    • economic equality

    • women still inferior, but foundation feminism laid by Mary Astell

scientific developments and new insights:

  • Bacon: observation and experiment as the basic of knowledge

  • Hobbes: dynamic view of man

    • authoritarian state authority

    • state of nature: human nature, self-realization, selfishness → he thought back to human in society without authority, leads to…

    • … homo-homini-lupus society → every man for himself, competition and combat

    • unconditional social contract (people give up part freedom to the leader (called Leviathan) in exchange for security

    • impose authority through monopoly legitimate force, take care of poor, religious/moral rules pushed aside (= state religion)

    • common wealth, administration, law and order, poor people’s welfare responsibility leader

  • Descartes: reason as a possibility of knowledge (I know therefore I am)

  • de Spinoza: God determined by reason

    • rationalist

    • combined reason and religion

    • break with medieval philosophy

    • God’s understanding according to reasonable understanding

    • selfishness of man can only be given up by the love of God, not by a social contract => taking away freedom from man doesn’t take away their selfishness, they’ll still fight amongst each other

    • man is selfish = power not in hands of 1 man

    • laid groundwork ideas of democracy