Crises in the Early Church – Comprehensive Bullet-Point Study Notes
Chapter I The Jewish Crisis – New Testament Phase
• Central question – “Shall Christianity remain a Jewish sect?”
• Jesus’ personal stance toward Judaism
- Born, circumcised, educated and worshipping as a Jew.
- Accepted the whole as binding, yet saw it as pointing beyond Israel (e.g., ).
- Key principle: not abolition but fulfilment – .
• Universal vision implicit in prophets; explicit in Great Commission .
• Critics (esp. Moffatt) object to authenticity of the Commission → Faulkner’s counter-arguments:
1. Jesus’ authority already recognized in .
2. Promise of spiritual presence saturates synoptics (e.g., ).
3. Disciples did not live in “flagrant disobedience”; plan was – cf. .
4. “Trinitarian” phrasing not premature – latent throughout gospel.
5. Baptism “in Christ’s name” in Acts ≠ liturgical formula, only confessional badge.
• Acts narrative:
- Initial temple fellowship, Jewish preaching (§2–4).
- Stephen’s speech triggers persecution; believers scatter (Hellenists).
- Philip evangelises Samaria; Peter admits Cornelius without circumcision.
- Antioch mission (Cyprus & Cyrene men) – Gentiles converted, Barnabas + Paul teach.
• Council of Jerusalem (≈ AD 49) decides:
- Gentiles saved by faith; no circumcision.
- “Decree” of four abstentions (idols’ meat, blood, things strangled, fornication) = temporary, regional, conciliatory.
- Faulkner defends historicity against advanced critics (Pfleiderer, Seeberg) via four counters (Gal 2 ≠ Ac 15 etc.).
• Aftermath: Pauline epistles (Gal, Rom) safeguard liberty; Jewish churches gradually fade after AD 70.
Chapter II Jewish Crisis – Post-Apostolic
• Events pushing separation:
- Fall of Jerusalem 70 AD.
- Bar-Kochba revolt 132-135 AD → Jerusalem renamed Aelia Capitolina; Jews banned; anti-Christian anathemas added to synagogue liturgy.
• Two strands of Jewish Christians:
1. Ebionite/strict – insisted on law; later sectarian.
2. Nazaraean/liberal – kept law personally but accepted Gentile freedom.
• Patristic witnesses:
- Justin’s Dialogue §46-47: tolerant to law-keepers if they impose not on others.
- Ignatius (Mag., Philad.) condemns Judaizers: “It is monstrous to confess Christ and practise Judaism.”
- Ep. Barnabas (70-138?) caricatures Judaism as error – extreme anti-Jewish line.
• Extreme developments:
- Cerinthus (docetic-Jewish)—Jesus merely human; Christ-Spirit descends at baptism.
- Ebionites: used Hebrew Mt, denied virgin birth, rejected Paul.
- Elkesaites: syncretistic, magical washings, angel-Christ.
- Clementine Homilies/Recognitions: “Gnostic Ebionism,” Adam-Christ theory, vegetarianism, legalism.
Chapter III Gnostic Crisis – Threat of Theosophic Transformation
• Gnosis = salvation by Esoteric Knowledge.
• Soil: Jewish allegory (Philo), Hellenic myth-allegory, oriental magic, syncretism.
• Common Gnostic motives
1. Speculative cosmology; series of aeons.
2. Demiurge creator < Supreme God.
3. Dualism matter vs spirit; salvation = escape.
4. Docetic Christ; varying Christ-Jesus split.
5. Elitist anthropology: pneumatic – psychic – hylic.
6. Mixed ethics: asceticism OR libertinism.
• Marcion (fl. 155) – polished Latin form:
- OT God just/harsh ≠ good Father.
- Christ a heavenly phantom; overturns law; canon = mutilated Luke + 10 Paulines.
- Spread Persia → Italy.
• Church’s triple answer
1. Theological refutation – Irenaeus, Tertullian, Origen etc.
2. Rule of Faith & Creeds – brief baptismal symbols to screen false gnosis.
3. Canon formation + sound exegesis – delimiting authoritative NT.
• Absorption: certain liturgical, philosophical and monastic elements taken over, yet core stayed biblical; body, OT and free-will preserved.
Chapter IV Montanist Crisis – Is Christianity Progressive by Spirit?
• Background: still living prophetic charisma; ecstatic speech; lively Parousia hope; moral laxity rising c AD 150.
• Montanus (Phrygia c 155) + prophetesses Prisca, Maximilla claim final out-pouring of Spirit = age of Paraclete (Joel 3).
• Key features
- Universal, continuing prophecy; ecstatic, first-person divine oracles.
- Ethical rigor: second marriages forbidden; fast-rules; veiling; refusing post-baptismal absolution for mortal sin; no flight from martyrdom; anti-military.
- Imminent New Jerusalem at Pepuza; though chiliastic not detailed.
- Ecclesiology: Spirit > bishop; democracy of charismatics.
• Reception
- Initially welcomed in Asia; soon opposed; councils excommunicate, yet some Roman bishops vacillate.
- Tertullian (after AD 200) embraces movement in N. Africa.
• Evaluation
- Positives: protest against worldliness; reminder of gifts.
- Negatives: rigid legalism; denial of Church’s forgiving power; over-reliance on ecstasy; localised eschatology.
- Church rejected “New Prophecy” but retained principle of progress via Spirit within Scriptural bounds.
Chapter V Monarchian Crisis – Who is Jesus Christ?
• Issue: reconcile one God (Monarchy) with worship of Christ.
• Types
1. Dynamic Monarchianism – Jesus a mere (though unique) man endowed with divine “power” (Theodotus leather-worker; Paul of Samosata).
2. Modalistic / Patripassian – Father, Son, Spirit = modes of same person (Noetus, Praxeas, Sabellius; some Roman popes Zephyrinus, Callistus).
• Church response: affirm real distinction yet unity: Logos-Christ eternally with Father; true humanity preserved; Tertullian & Hippolytus refute; Novatian, Origen develop arguments.
• Outcome: Monarchian forms fade; set stage for Nicene development.
Chapter VI Chiliastic Crisis – Catastrophe or Leaven?
• Chiliasm (= premillennialism) promises visible 1000-yr reign.
- Roots: Zoroastrian ages; certain Jewish apocalypses (1 Enoch 91-93; 4 Ezra 7; 2 Baruch 40); not in Jesus’ teachings.
• Early Fathers
- Papias, Irenaeus, Justin expect earthly plenty, Jerusalem rebuilt.
- Didache, 2 Clem etc. expect near Parousia but non-chiliastic.
• Opposition
- Alexandrians (Origen) spiritualize; Dionysius of Alex. refutes Nepos; Revelation’s authority contested in East.
- Augustine spiritualises millennium → present Church = kingdom; view prevails; chiliasm wanes.
Chapter VII Arian Crisis – Have We a Saviour as Divine as Human?
• Arius (presbyter, Alexandria 318): Son a creature, ; “there was when he was not.”
• Opponents: Alexander, Athanasius (deacon, later bishop).
• Council of Nicaea 325
- Three blocs: right (Athanasians), centre (Origenist/Caesarean), left (Arians ≈ 20).
- Reject Arian draft; adopt Caesarean creed with anti-Arian additions:
• “from the substance of the Father”
• “begotten not made”
• “ (of one essence) with the Father”
- Anathema clauses enumerate Arian slogans.
- All but two bishops sign; Constantine backs settlement.
• Reasons for victory
1. Religious soteriology – only God can save (Athanasius).
2. Traditional faith of majority once clarified.
3. Strong personalities (Athanasius, Hosius, Eustathius).
4. Imperial pressure after Constantine convinced.
• Aftermath: Creed safeguards Incarnation; Church avoids both sub-ordinationism and modalism.
Chapter VIII The Catholic Change – From Spirit to System
• Gradual institutional shift, not single crisis.
• Doctrine
- “Faith + sacraments” displaced “faith alone.”
- Baptismal regeneration; Eucharistic real-presence; penitential system.
- Rule of Faith--Creed solidifies; becomes baptismal test.
• Ministry / Government
- Charismatic prophets & itinerants dominant in 1C (1 Cor 14; Didache 11).
- By mid-2C monarchical episcopate consolidates (Rome only after c 140).
- Clergy evolve from ministers to priests; altars appear c 3C; Cyprian systematises.
• Worship
- Early free services (reading, spontaneous prayer, love-meal).
- 2C formularies (Clement’s prayer; Justin’s outline).
- 3-4C fixed liturgies, eucharistic symbolism, hierarchy.
• Ethos
- Ascetic ideals, monastic seeds; legalistic morality; loss of immediacy.
- Yet charity, missions and doctrinal consolidation accompany.
Over-arching Insights & Exam Cues
• Crises act as divine pedagogy; each error forces clearer definition.
• Jew–Gentile schism settled question of universal gospel.
• Gnosticism & Marcionism compel canon + creed; Monarchian & Arian crises shape Christology; Montanism and Chiliasm refine pneumatology and eschatology.
• Catholic evolution shows strengths (unity, doctrinal clarity) and perils (legalism, sacerdotalism).
Key Formulas & Texts (memorise in )
• Nicene term: .
• Arian catch-word:
• Great Commission: – debate of authenticity.
• Didache baptismal triad echoes .
• Rule of Faith sample (2C):
Mnemonic Timeline
1 C Jewish dispute → 2 C Gnostic/Montanist/Monarchian → mid 3 C Cyprianic system → 325 Nicaea → 4 C Augustine anti-Chiliast → Mediaeval Catholicism.