Giant Impact Scenarios: Earth-Moon System Formation

3. GIANT IMPACT SCENARIOS

  • Impact origin studies aim to identify the collisional scenarios that account for the properties of the Earth-Moon system.

  • The goal includes finding plausible scenarios based on our understanding of Earth’s formation.

  • It has proven challenging, leading to various impact models.

3.1 General Constraints and Methods

3.1.1 Constraints
  • The current angular momentum of the Earth-Moon system is defined as:

    • L_{EM} = 3.5 imes 10^{41} ext{ g cm}^2 ext{ s}^{-1}

  • Tidal interactions between the Earth and Moon lead to:

    • Slowing of Earth's spin.

    • Expansion of the Moon's orbit, while conserving angular momentum.

  • The initial terrestrial day length was approximately 5 hours after a newly-formed Moon was orbiting just outside the Roche limit, assuming the primordial system's angular momentum was comparable to LEM.

  • Oblique collisions are seen as a natural source of rapid early spin for Earth.

  • Angular momentum delivered by an impactor of mass Mi = MT (where M_T represents total colliding mass) is expressed as follows (Canup 2004b):

    • \begin{align} Li = b MT \left(\frac{5}{3}\right)^{\frac{f(\gamma)}{\sqrt{2G}} \left(\frac{4}{3}\right)^{\frac{1}{3}} \left(\frac{vi}{v{esc}}\right)^{1.3} L_{EM} b\right)
      \end{align
      }

  • Definitions of symbols used in the equation:

    • b = \sin \theta (scaled impact parameter), where \theta is the impact angle (0 degrees for head-on impacts).

    • vi and v{esc} denote the impact and mutual escape velocities, respectively.

    • Average density of the impactor and target is assumed equal.

    • Function f(\gamma) is defined as:
      f(\gamma) = \gamma (1 - \gamma) \sqrt{\gamma \frac{1}{3}} \left(1 - \gamma \frac{1}{3}\right).

  • It's conjectured that the initial angular momentum of the Earth-Moon system after Moon formation needed to be close to LEM, given subsequent minor alterations in angular momentum due to:

    • Mass escape during lunar accretion,

    • Direct solar tides,

    • Effects from smaller later impacts,

    • Short-term capture into the evection resonance.

  • Identified dynamical mechanisms may remove substantial angular momentum from the Earth-Moon system after the formation of the Moon, indicating initial system angular momentum could have been as high as 2 to 3 LEM (Ćuk & Stewart 2012; Wisdom and Tian 2015; Ćuk et al. 2016; Tian et al. 2017; Rufu and Canup 2020).

  • A successful single impact scenario must result in a disk with adequate mass and angular momentum to later form a lunar-mass Moon (mass M_L = 0.0123 M), orbiting outside of the Roche limit, which is given as:

    • a_R = 2.9 R (for lunar-density materials).

  • From conservation of mass and angular momentum, the mass of the moon (MM) that can be formed at a distance (aM = Xa aR) is approximated:

    • \frac{MM}{MD} \approx C1 \left(\frac{LD}{MD\sqrt{G M} aR}\right)^{-C2-C3\left(\frac{M{esc}}{MD}\right)}

  • where:

    • M{esc} is the mass that escapes during moon accretion, and constants C1, C2, C3 depend on X_a and specific angular momenta of escaping material.

  • This equation approximates whether a disk created by an impact can result in a lunar-mass Moon, invalid if MM/MD > 1, corresponding to disks with specific angular momenta too high for final moon formation.

  • Results from early N-body lunar accretion simulations suggest:

    • = 1.3 a_R (Ida et al. 1997; Kokubo et al. 2000).

  • More recent hybrid simulations found:

    • = 2.15 a_R (Salmon and Canup 2012), indicating less efficient accretion.

  • An initial disk mass between about 1.3 and 3 lunar masses is required to yield a lunar-mass Moon under typical post-impact conditions.

3.1.2 Methods
  • Ejecta on circum-planetary orbits arise from:

    • Vaporization-related pressure gradients.

    • Gravitational torques from interactions among ejected material or between the ejecta and the post-impact planet’s distorted shape.

  • Producing disks involves:

    • 3D hydrodynamical modeling, including phase changes and self-gravity.

    • The most used method is Smoothing Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH):

    • Objects are represented by numerous particles evolved by

      • Self-gravity,

      • Pressure forces,

      • Shock dissipation (Benz et al. 1989).

    • Each particle is ascribed a composition (silicate or iron) and a corresponding equation of state.

    • Limited simulations have also applied grid-based Eulerian codes (Wada et al. 2006; Canup et al. 2013).

3.2 Canonical Impact

  • An impactor approximately Mars-mass colliding with Earth at low speed (similar to v_{esc}) can produce:

    • An iron-depleted Moon,

    • A planet-disk system with angular momentum L_{EM} (Canup and Asphaug 2001; Canup 2004a,b, 2008, 2014).

  • Impactor mass and velocity are common in terrestrial planet accretion models:

    • Collision angle needed is between 40 to 50 degrees (Canup 2004, 2008) centered on the average angle (45 degrees) for random impacts, thus around 20% fall in this range.

  • A central difficulty for canonical impacts is explaining isotopic similarities between Earth and Moon.

    • Typically, 70-80% of the disk comes from the impactor's mantle, resulting in:

    • f_T = -70 ext{ to } -90 ext{ percent} (e.g., Fig. 1 in Canup 2014).

  • This discrepancy yields greater compositional differences than the required |f_T| < 5 ext{%} for Mars-like hypothetical impactors.

  • Identifying canonical impacts, pre-impact rotation affects disk portion from the impactor modestly:

    • This percentage varies from 60 to 90% with pre-impact rotation, with fT ≤ -50 ext{%} under the condition that L{EM} remains intact (Canup 2008).

  • Research by Hosono et al. (2019) indicates:

    • A canonical impact can yield a disk mainly from Earth's mantle if:

    1. Earth's surface magma ocean existed at the time of impact.

    2. Utilized a modified SPH code.

    • Their adjusted simulations yielded massive disks (MD ≥ MM), primarily Earth-dominated, averaging only 30% impactor material, or f_T = -17 ext{%}.

  • In contrast, standard SPH and hard-sphere EOS simulations led to impactor-dominated disks.

  • A successful canonical Moon-forming impact necessitates either:

    • An impactor with Earth-like isotopic composition,

    • Vapor mixing between the impact disk and planet effectively erasing the impactor's compositional signature.

  • The latter process is termed equilibration and is deeply uncertain (Pahlevan and Stevenson 2007; §4.2).

3.3 Hit-and-Run Impact

  • Less oblique, higher-velocity impacts produce disks with more target material:

  • Increased vi results in substantial escaper angular momentum, enabling larger values of Li, thus potentially larger impactors.

  • Reufer et al. (2012) define a hit-and-run category with impact angles of 30 to 40 degrees, where:

    • 1.2 < \frac{vi}{v{esc}} < 1.4

    • Lead to massive disks, achieving 40-60% from the impactor, and giving -50 < f_T < -35 (e.g., Fig. 1 in Canup 2014).

  • While this reduces the planet-disk compositional difference, it remains larger than needed to validate the isotopic similarities, particularly for Mars-like impactors.

  • The most effective hit-and-run impacts producing sufficient mass to generate a lunar-mass Moon and maintaining angular momentum around 1.3 ext{ to } 1.4 L_{EM} require mechanisms to extract angular momentum afterward (§4.7).

3.4 Fast-Spinning Earth Impact

  • Recent studies focus on impacts yielding significantly higher angular momentum systems to rationalize isotopic similarities between Earth and Moon (Ćuk and Stewart 2012; Canup 2012; Lock et al. 2018).

  • Two principal configurations generate post-impact planet-disk systems with roughly similar amounts of material from both bodies, i.e., |f_T| in the range 1 to 10%:

    1. An impact with a proto-Earth spinning with angular momentum far exceeding LEM.

    2. A collision between two half-Earth mass bodies (§3.5).

  • Both configurations necessitate a subsequent adjustment mechanism to achieve current angular momentum levels (§4.7).

  • N-body simulations indicate that high-energy impacts likely result in rapid rotation, suggesting many Earth-like planets formed quickly due to giant impacts, excluding fragmentation.

  • Ćuk and Stewart (2012) scrutinized impacts into rapidly rotating targets with angular momentum between around 2.0 to 3.0 LEM before Moon formation, with the upper limit being near spin stability.

  • Fast impactors (Mi = 0.026 ext{ to } 0.1M, vi = 1.5 ext{ to } 3 v{esc}) with retrograde angles (0 to -20 degrees) yield disks with |fT| between 4 and 15%, mostly from the target’s mantle.

  • The fast-spinning Earth impact scenario maintains specific energy one order of magnitude above a canonical impact, with the resultant disk regions largely vapor, contrasting with canonical impacts led by molten materials (leading to different post-impact characteristics and evolutions) (§4.4).

3.5 Half-Earth Impact

  • If the mass of the Moon-forming impactor is much smaller than M, the final planet derives mostly from the target (near unity)

  • A disk needing minimal compositional variance from the planet means that F_{P,tar}
    ightarrow 1, established by equation (3.3).

  • The challenge extends to ensuring the entirety of silicate compositions in both disk and planet matches, requiring:

    • \frac{F{P,tar}}{F{D,tar}} \rightarrow 1

    • For completely symmetrical collisions involving half-Earth mass bodies, the concluding disk and planet both contain equal proportions of their respective contributions (50% target and 50% impactor).

  • Notably, then:

    • F{P,tar} = F{D,tar} = 0.5,

    • \frac{F{P,tar}}{F{D,tar}} = 1, leading to f_T = 0.

  • Some collisions with impactors exceeding 40% of Earth's mass can yield minimal compositional differences between disk and planet (up to 1 to 10% difference, as suggested by Canup 2012).

  • Successful scenarios accommodate various impact speeds (1 < \frac{vi}{v{esc}} < 1.6) and impact parameters (0.35 < b < 0.7), regardless of the proto-Earth's pre-impact spin state.

  • Such impacts are akin to processes responsible for the Pluto-Charon binary (Canup 2005).

  • A half-Earth impact can also create a larger disk mass than other scenarios (approaching MD ~ 2 to 5M_L), which assists in forming a lunar-sized Moon in case of inefficient accretion (Lock et al. 2018, Fig. 7).

  • The produced Earth-disk system aligns angular momentum between 1.8 and 2.7 LEM, necessitating subsequent momentum reduction.

3.6 General High-Angular Momentum/High-Energy Impact

  • Scenarios of fast-spinning Earth and half-Earth take their positions as extreme cases of high-angular momentum impacts yielding near-equivalent silicate compositions in resulting disk-planet systems.

  • Conversely, a broader array of high angular momentum impacts remains viable if disk-planet compositional differences moderate upon equilibration.

  • Lock and Stewart (2017) found numerous giant impacts yielding a synestia, a partially vaporized, highly rotating planetary body with internal energy exceeding stationary objects (refer to §4.4).

  • Such equilibration within a synestia is potentially achievable via multiphase convective and turbulent mixing, especially in high-entropy regions (Lock et al. 2018).

  • A notable percentage of impacts producing post-impact bodies with angular momentum greater than 1.7 LEM (including fast-spinning Earth and half-Earth impacts) likely result in synestias, while impacts generating lower angular momentum systems might also yield synestias under very high-energy criteria (§4.4).

  • Many Earth-like planets likely experienced a sequence of synestia-producing impacts during their late accretion phase (Quintana et al. 2016; Lock and Stewart 2017).

3.7 Multiple Impacts

  • Simulations indicate that Earth endured multiple planetary-scale impacts throughout its final accretion phase (Agnor et al. 1999).

  • The hypothesis that the Moon formed from cumulative effects of numerous collisions was initially presented by Ringwood (1989) and later refined with contemporary methodologies.

  • Rufu et al. (2017) propose a multiple impact model where:

    • The Moon emerges from a series of medium- to large-size collisions involving impactors with mass ranging from 10^{-2} to 10^{-1} M.

  • Each impact results in a sub-lunar mass satellite migrating outward due to tidal interactions:

    • It initially migrates faster and slows down as it moves further from the proto-Earth.

  • A subsequent impact can yield a new inner moonlet, which through tidal expansion may merge with the preceding outer moon.

  • This chain process facilitates the Moon's assembly from smaller moonlets produced by several impacts.

  • Analyzing over 10% of the simulation trajectories leads to a final Earth rotating at a suitable rate (Rufu et al. 2017; §5.4).

  • Comparatively, the Rufu et al. model includes smaller impactors and a wider spectrum of impact angles (head-on to grazing) and velocities (1 - 4 v_{esc}).

  • Higher proportions of target materials arise from nearly head-on or high-velocity impacts, increasing the chance for compositional matches between Earth and Moon.

  • Increased impactor and moonlet counts reduce compositional variances between Earth and Moon, expressed as \sqrt{N}, aligning both closer to the mean planetesimal neighborhood.

  • Monte Carlo simulations estimate sequences of around N ~ 20 to 30 impacts can generate a lunar-sized satellite; substantial fractions of these histories yield isotopically comparable Earth and Moon pairs.

4. POST-IMPACT EVOLUTION

  • This section examines the post-impact evolution of Earth and its satellite material, emphasizing a multidisciplinary perspective.

  • The evolution must deliver an Earth-Moon system that meets various dynamical and compositional constraints.

4.1 Mixing During a Moon-Forming Impact and Earth's Mantle Heterogeneity

  • The relevant geochemical system for early Earth studies involves Hf-W isotopes.

  • Conventionally, Earth’s present mantle indices are noted as:

    • ^{182}W = 0,

    • while chondrites reveal ^{182}W = -1.9 (Schoenberg et al. 2002; Kleine et al. 2002; Yin et al. 2002).

  • Recent findings unveil some Archean Earth samples display positive W anomalies relative to BSE (e.g., ^{182}W = 20 ext{ ppm} by Willbold et al. 2011; Touboul et al. 2012) and modern flood basalts exhibit even greater anomalies (e.g., ^{182}W > 50 ext{ ppm}, Rizo et al. 2016), while others present negative deviations (Mundl et al. 2017).

  • Such early W discrepancies might correlate with seismic anomalies observed at the core-mantle boundary, like the LLSVPs (large low-shear velocity provinces, Garnero and McNamara 2008).

  • Besides tungsten, other isotopic systems may also reflect early ancient mantle heterogeneity preservation.

  • Mukhopadhyay (2012) notes Ne (neon) ratios, like ^{20}Ne/^{22}Ne and ^{129}Xe/^{130}Xe (with 129Xe being the decay product of ^{129}I with half-life t_{1/2} = 16 ext{ Myr}), can suggest preservation linked to their separation since approximately 4.45 Ga.

  • The similarity of ^{20}Ne/^{22}Ne ratios in fluid inclusions of plume-related formations to solar metrics (Yokochi and Marty 2004) points towards the growing Earth’s mantle capturing nebular gas while the solar nebula persisted, without complete homogenization.

  • The Moon-forming impact is generally deemed to have transpired roughly 60-70 Myr after the initial solid formation of the solar system (§2.5).

  • Nonetheless, uncertainties concerning metal-silicate equilibration during Earth's accretion lead studies to suggest a formation window extending broadly from 10 to 175 Myr (Fischer and Nimmo 2018).

  • If the Moon's formation followed the development of the recognized mantle heterogeneities, it implies that the Moon-forming instance(s) did not entirely homogenize Earth’s mantle.

  • Canonical and multiple impact models align with theories concerning a non-fully mixed mantle.

  • Conversely, the significantly high-energy fast-spinning Earth impact might conserve some mantle heterogeneities contrary to the impact point (refer to Figure 3b).

  • A half-Earth impact is reputedly likely to dynamically mix the mantle, potentially erasing such heterogeneities (Nakajima and Stevenson 2015; Fig. 3c).

  • Further investigation is essential for a comprehensive understanding of this complex domain.