Learning and Memory - Comprehensive Notes
Revision - Brain Regions Involved in Different Kinds of Learning and Memory
- Long-term memory
- Declarative (explicit)
- Episodic: Hippocampus, medial temporal lobe, neocortex
- Semantic: Lateral and anterior temporal cortex, prefrontal cortex
- Nondeclarative (implicit)
- Skill learning (procedural): Striatum, motor cortex, cerebellum
- Priming: Neocortex
- Classical conditioning: Amygdala and cerebellum
- Nonassociative learning: Reflex pathways
- Spatial memory: Hippocampus and cortex
- Short-term memory (working memory)
- Sensorimotor and prefrontal cortex
Definition of Memory & Learning
- Learning: The process of acquiring new and relatively enduring information, behavioral patterns, or abilities; characterized by modification of behavior as a result of practice, study, or experience.
- Memory: The ability to store (encode and retain for some interval of time) and retrieve (or reactivate) information.
- The specific information stored in the brain.
- A complex dynamic system (change in response to input and to maintain this change for some time).
- More than stimulus-response reflex.
- Neural representation.
Memory Storage and Physical Changes in the Brain
- Memory storage requires physical changes in the brain.
- Invertebrate nervous systems show plasticity.
- Some simple learning in mammals relies on circuits in the cerebellum.
- Synaptic plasticity can be measured in simple hippocampal circuits.
- In the adult brain, newly born neurons may aid learning.
- Learning and memory change as we age.
Hebbian Cell Assembly
- Engram = memory trace
- Should explain cellular and physiological underpinning of memory
- Current hypothesis: memory is in the changing of synaptic connections (and their strengths).
Neuroplasticity
- Neuroplasticity (or neural plasticity) is the ability of neurons and neural circuits to be remodeled in response to experience or the environment.
- Sherrington
- Introduced the term: synapse
- Speculated that alterations in synapses were the basis for learning.
- Synaptic changes can be physiological or structural (and they can be measured physiologically).
- Changes may be
- presynaptic,
- postsynaptic, or
- both.
Synaptic Changes
- Changes include
- increased neurotransmitter release
- changes in neurotransmitter-receptor interactions
- changes in the rate of inactivation of transmitter
- Greater effect: increased PSP = post-synaptic potential
- Inputs from other neurons may modulate neurotransmitter release (depolarization or hyperpolarization of axon terminals).
Neuronal Remodeling
- Structural changes at the synapse may provide long-term storage.
- New synapses could form or some could be eliminated with training.
- Training might also lead to synaptic reorganization.
Glial Cells and Memory
- Beyond neural cells – recent findings (Alberini et al, 2017): all types of glial cells (astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and microglia) make important contributions to the processing of encoded information and storing memories
- Role of astrocytes: providers of energy for the long-lasting neuronal changes - necessary for long‐term memory formation.
- Role of glucose metabolism in learning through activity‐dependent metabolic coupling between astrocytes and neurons → long‐term memory formation;
- Role of astrocytic glucose metabolism in arousal →state that contributes to the formation of very long‐lasting and detailed memories
- High energy demands of the brain during early development → the possible role of astrocytic and neuronal glucose metabolisms in the formation of early‐life memories
Environmental Complexity
- Lab animals living in a complex environment demonstrated biochemical and anatomical brain changes different from those living in simpler environments.
- Three housing conditions:
- Standard condition (SC)
- Impoverished condition (IC)
- Enriched condition (EC)
- Animals housed in EC, compared to those in IC, developed
- Heavier, thicker cortex
- Enhanced cholinergic activity
- More dendritic branches (esp. basal dendrites), with more dendritic spines, suggesting more synapses
- Similar findings in other mammals, even in humans (MRI studies)
Aplysia and Synaptic Changes
- Aplysia (sea slug) is used to study plastic synaptic changes in neural circuits.
- The advantages of working with Aplysia:
- Fewer nerve cells
- Can create detailed circuit maps for particular behaviors
- Little variation between individuals
Nonassociative Learning
- Invertebrates demonstrate simplest type of learning: nonassociative learning
- A single stimulus presented once or repeated alters the strength or probability of a response according to the strength and temporal spacing or the stimulus (stimuli)
- Three types of nonassociative learning
- Habituation—a decreased response to repeated presentations of a stimulus (not sensory adaptation or motor fatigue!)
- Dishabituation—restoration of response amplitude after habituation.
- Sensitization—prior strong (and/or painful) stimulation increases response to most stimuli.
Aplysia and Habituation
- Habituation is studied in Aplysia.
- Squirts of water on its siphon causes it to retract its gill.
- After repeated squirts, the animal retracts the gills less; it has learned that the water poses no danger.
Synaptic Changes in Habituation
- The habituation is caused by synaptic changes between the sensory cell in the siphon and the motoneuron that retracts the gill.
- Less transmitter released in the synapse results in less retraction.
- Over several days, the animal habituates faster, representing long-term habituation.
- Long-term habituation due to retraction of some synaptic terminals (= number of synapses between the sensory cell and the motoneuron is reduced)
Cerebellum and Classical Conditioning
- In mammals, neural circuits studied in the eye-blink reflex
- A circuit in the cerebellum is necessary for some types of classical conditioning.
- An air puff (US) is preceded by an acoustic tone (CS); conditioned animals will blink (CR) when only the tone is heard.
- The circuit:
- Trigeminal (V) pathway carries sensory information from the cornea to its nucleus in the brainstem (inferior olive)
- Interneurons then send climbing fibers to synapse on cerebellar neurons in the interpositus nucleus
Interpositus Nucleus
- GABA antagonists reversibly shuts down interpositus nucleus → cause conditioned behaviors to disappear until the drug wears off.
Hebb and Synaptic Connections
- Hebb proposed that when two neurons are repeatedly activated together, their synaptic connection becomes stronger = „fire together, wire together”
- Cell assemblies—ensembles of neurons— linked via Hebbian synapses could store memory traces.
- When researchers applied a tetanus (brief high-frequency burst of electrical stimuli) to the hippocampus, response of postsynaptic neurons changed—larger EPSPs.
Long-Term Potentiation (LTP)
- Long-term potentiation (LTP)—a stable and enduring increase in the effectiveness of synapses following repeated strong stimulation (tetanus)
- Weakening of synaptic efficacy—termed long-term depression—can also encode information.
- The hippocampal formation consists of two interlocking C-shaped structures
- In CA1, LTP is dependent on NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptors that work with AMPA receptors.
- AMPA=α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid
Glutamate and Receptors
- Glutamate first activates AMPA receptors.
- NMDA receptors do not respond until enough AMPA receptors are stimulated, and the neuron is partially depolarized.
Calcium Influx and Protein Kinases
- The large Ca2+ influx activates certain protein kinases—enzymes that add phosphate groups to protein molecules.
- One protein kinase, CaMKII (calcium-calmodulin kinase II), affects AMPA receptors in several ways:
- Causes more AMPA receptors to be produced and inserted in the postsynaptic membrane
- Moves existing nearby AMPA receptors into the active synapse
- Increases conductance of Na+ and K+ ions in membrane-bound AMPA receptors
- These effects all increase the synaptic sensitivity to glutamate
CREB
- Protein kinases activate CREB (=cAMP responsive element-binding protein)
- CREB
- Transcription factor
- → binds to DNA promoter regions and changes the transcription rate of genes
- Genetic deletion leads to impairment in LTM (associated with long-lasting LTP)
Retrograde Messenger
- Strong stimulation of a postsynaptic cell causes release of a retrograde messenger, that travels across the synapse and alters function in the presynaptic neuron.
- Ensure that more glutamate released
- Messenger types: diffusible gas like carbon monoxide (CO) or nitric oxide (NO)
- Yet, other varied mechanisms of LTP:
- Mossy fiber pathway (hippocampus): LTP without NMDA receptor activity
- Drugs with different modes of action can sometimes block LTP (eg: opiate antagonists)
- Evidence indicates LTP may be one part of memory formation
- Correlational observations
- time course of LTP is similar to time course of memory formation
- induced within seconds and lasts days / weeks
- Somatic intervention experiments—
- pharmacological treatments that block LTP impair learning
- Eg: NMDA blocker, CaMKII inhibitor, genetic manipulation of kinase or receptor genes
- Behavioral intervention experiments
- training an animal in a memory task can induce LTP
- Eg: fear conditioning paradigm
LTP and Neuronal Computations
- Contrary to current conceptual frameworks, we found that hippocampal CA1- region LTP is not required for accurate representations of space in hippocampal neurons, but rather endows these neurons with reward- and novelty-coding properties.
- Thus, instead of driving formation of cognitive maps and memory engrams, CA1-region LTP incorporates salience information into cognitive representations.
Synapses and Memory
- Our understanding of the processes underlying learning and memory has been dominated by the view that synapses are the principal site of information storage in the brain.
- This view has received substantial support from research in several model systems, with the vast majority of studies on the topic corroborating a role for synapses in memory storage.
- Yet, despite the neuroscience community’s best efforts, we are still without conclusive proof that memories reside at synapses.
- Furthermore, an increasing number of non-synaptic mechanisms have emerged that are also capable of acting as memory substrates.
Forgetting
- Main reasons behind forgetting:
- Erasure / storage failure (true loss of memory content
- Retrieval failure
- Memory disruption
- Theory of disuse (Bjork and Bjork 1992):
- Two types of memory strength:
- Storage strength (how well a memory was learnt)
- Retrieval strength ( how well a memory can be accessed – currently!)
- Storage strength not reduced only retrieval strength changes over time
- Possible reason behind: increased adaptability – less need for older information?
- Other idea: generalization of memories?
Molecular Mechanisms of Forgetting
- Removal of GluA2/AMPAR?
- If peptide used to interfere with GluA2/AMPAR function: forgetting prevented Migues et al 2016
- Activity dependent synaptic removal of GluA2/AMPAR Forgetting – active process !
- Molecular Mechanisms:
- BRAG2 degradation
- PKMT/BRAG2
- PKMζ/BRAG2
- PICK1 degradation
- Glutamate
- Ca2+
- GluN2A/NMDAR
- GluN2B/NMDAR
- GluA2/AMPAR
Adult Neurogenesis
- Adult neurogenesis in the brain occurs primarily in the dentate gyrus.
- More plastic
- Show enhanced LTP
- Using conditional knockout studies, turning off neurogenesis in adult brains reduced spatial learning—minimal effect on other behaviors.
- Adult neurogenesis is also seen in the olfactory bulb.
Learning, Memory, and Aging
- Healthy elderly
- Some impairments in conscious recollection (presence of structure or cue will increase performance)
- Working memory impairments
- Decline in formation of new episodic and declarative memory
- Some decline in spatial memory and navigational skills
- Autobiographical memory stable
- Semantic knowledge stable
- Vocabulary: even outperform younger participants
- Pathological aging
- More severe impairments & steeper decline
- Eg: Alzheimer’s disease
- Impairments of coding and retrieval
- less frontal and temporal cortical activation in some tasks like in learning new faces
- However recognition is comparable to younger participants
- Loss of neurons and/or neural connections
- some parts of the brain lose a larger proportion of volume (especially the frontal cortex)
- Deterioration of cholinergic pathways
- the septal complex and the nucleus basalis of Meynert provide cholinergic input to the hippocampus and cortex.
- Cholinergic pathways to the cortex are lost in Alzheimer’s disease.
Nootropics and Lifestyle
- Nootropics are a class of drugs that enhance cognitive function.
- Cholinesterase inhibitors can have a positive effect on memory and cognition.
- Ampakines, which act via glutamate receptors, improve LTP in the hippocampus.
- Protein kinases, such as PKMζ (ζ is zeta) may contribute to long-term maintenance memory traces.
- Lifestyle factors can help reduce cognitive decline:
- Living in a favorable environment
- Involvement in complex and intellectually stimulating activities
- Having a partner of high cognitive status
Artificial Activation of an Engram
- Mice were genetically modified so that when neurons in the dentate gyrus (DG) were active, they would produce channelrhodopsin
- optogenetic protein that excite those cells (and only those cells) when exposed to blue light.
- Fiber optics were implanted that could be made to shine on the DG neurons.
- The mice were subjected to two contexts:
- Context A—A box with a white plastic floor, in a dimly lit room with black walls, and a faint smell of almonds; exploring the chamber triggered no signs of fear.
- Context B—A box with a wire grid floor, in a bright room, white walls and the smell of vinegar; exploration was accompanied by a tone and electrical shock, resulting in fear conditioning.
Conditioning Experiment
- Conditioning, while active neurons were able to produce channelrhodopsin, caused mice to find context B frightening—freeze response.
- Reactivating those neurons using blue light while in context A caused the mice to freeze in fear, even when they were in a completely different context.
- Turning the light off again caused the animals to resume activity, indicating that they remained unafraid of context A.
- It wasn’t just that light- induced activation of a random set of DG neurons induced fear, because when blue light reactivated DG neurons that had been active in a third (nonfearful) context (C), the animals did not freeze.