Second Language Acquisition
= when two languages are NOT acquired simultaneously from birth
→ ‘second language learner’ or ‘L2 learner’
difference between child L2 learners and adult L2 learners
before age of 1 = 2xL1 children (two first languages)
1-4yrs = early successive bilinguals
4-8yrs = L2 children
8yrs+= L2 adults
child and adult L2 learners differ from monolingual and simultaneous bilingual children…
- they are cognitively more mature
- they already have their L1 lang in place, a framework
- they may fossilize and not reach native levels of competence
- if L2 exposure is extensive, they may lose properties of their L1 (‘attrition’)
*fossilization
success in L2 is not guaranteed like in L1, you can ‘hit the buffers’ and stop progressing
can incl creating an incorrect grammar for the L2, and regardless of input, being unable to surpass it
Critical Period Hypothesis
there is a biological basis for learning a language
the ability to learn a language develops within a fixed period (same for first and second lang acq)
there is an age window that closes at a certain age and prevents lang learners from using the lang-learning mechanisms that are available in infancy
Critical Period Effects
→ Phonology: pronunciation of an L2 remains difficult for L2 learners regardless of proficiency, input or years of exposure
→ Morphology and Syntax: less problematic, usually more successfully acquired
→ Vocabulary: the least problematic, mostly about memory
Case study: Genie 1970
child raised in isolation until 14yrs, developed wide vocab but not syntax and grammar
Abrahamson and Hyltelsam
very direct relationship between age of L2 onset and score of perceived nativeness
other factors
input, motivation, individual differences
some L2s are easier than others to acquire
does having an L1 help or hinder L2 development?
two ways of learning an L2
spontaneously
(ie implicit learning), can be successful eg in migrants, but the lack of input compared to childrenconsciously
(ie explicit learning), in classrooms, taught but still relies on implicit understanding of language and conversation and immersion in implicit forms