Prosocial Behavior, Its Association With Well-Being, and Predictors of Prosocial Behavior During the Coronavirus Disease Pandemic

Study Overview

  • Investigated prosocial behavior, well-being, and predictors during the COVID-19 lockdown.
  • Cross-sectional online survey with 9,496 participants from eight regions.

Key Findings

  • Prosocial behavior frequently reported during lockdowns.
  • Prosocial behavior consistently associated with better well-being across regions.
  • High perceived social support strongly associated with prosocial behavior.
  • High perceived stress, positive affect, and psychological flexibility also significant predictors.

Introduction

  • COVID-19 pandemic led to states of emergency and behavioral measures impacting daily life.
  • Lockdowns caused social isolation, conflicting with the need for social connection.
  • Selfish/antisocial behaviors (e.g., non-compliance, stockpiling) and racism were observed.
  • Prosocial responses included hygiene practices, self-isolation, and community support.
  • Trauma can generate shared identity, increasing empathy and motivation to help.

Prosocial Behavior and Well-Being

  • Prosocial behavior linked to better physical and mental health, greater longevity, and emotional well-being.
  • Buffers against negative effects of daily stress and increases feelings of belonging.
  • Driven by empathy and concern for others.
  • Social support linked to increased prosocial behavior; social exclusion decreases it.
  • High levels of perceived social support predict more prosocial behavior.

Psychological Flexibility

  • Cornerstone of health and well-being, protects from negative effects of stress and major life events.
  • Allows individuals to prioritize meaningful areas in life and values.
  • High levels positively associated with prosocial behavior.

Perceived Stress

  • Stress can elicit prosocial behavior as a coping mechanism.
  • High levels of perceived stress positively related to prosocial behavior.

Positive Affect

  • Positive mood associated with prosocial behavior.
  • Prosocial behavior is a strategy to maintain positive mood.
  • Contributes to prosocial behavior during times of elevated stress.

Present Study Aims

  • Examine the extent of prosocial behaviors during COVID-19 lockdowns.
  • Investigate the relationship between prosocial behavior and well-being.
  • Identify predictors of prosocial behavior during the pandemic.
  • Investigate region-specific differences.

Materials and Methods

  • Part of the COVID-Impact project, an international cross-sectional online survey.
  • Data collected April-June 2020 via social media and university lists.
  • Well-being measured using the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF).
    • 14 items, 6-point Likert scale, Cronbach’s alpha of 0.91.
  • Prosocial behavior measured using six items from the Prosocialness Scale for Adults (PSA).
    • 5-point Likert scale, Cronbach’s alpha of 0.83.
  • Sociodemographic predictors: age, gender, education, employment, marital status, living situation.
  • Quarantine/Self-Isolation characteristics: time in lockdown, impact on finances and daily activities.
  • Social Support measured by the Oslo 3-item Social Support Scale (OSSS-3), Cronbach’s alpha of 0.54.
    • Classified into low, moderate, and high levels.
  • Psychological Flexibility measured by a 6-item instrument (Psy-Flex), Cronbach’s alpha of 0.84.
  • Perceived Stress measured by the 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Cronbach’s alpha of 0.89.
    • Classified into low, moderate, and high stress.
  • Positive Affect measured by the PANAS subscale, Cronbach’s alpha of 0.90.

Statistical Analysis

  • Descriptive statistics: frequencies, means, SDs, medians, and IQRs.
  • Countries grouped into eight geo-cultural regions.
    • Southern Europe, Eastern Europe, Western Europe, Northern Europe, Western Asia, East Asia, Latin America, North America.
  • Linear regression to compare regional means to overall mean; Cohen’s d for effect size.
  • Bivariate correlation analysis (r) to assess associations.
    • (\leq 0.10): very small, (\leq 0.20): small, (\leq 0.30): moderate, (\leq 0.40): large, (>0.40): very large effect sizes.
  • Simple linear regressions: prosocial behavior as predictor, well-being as outcome.
  • Multiple regression analyses: prosocial behavior as dependent variable.
  • Standardized regression coefficients (Beta) with 95% CI.
  • Variance Inflation Factors (VIF) to check for multicollinearity.
  • R software version 1.3.959 used for computations.

Results

  • Sample comprised N = 9,496 participants from 60 countries in eight regions.
  • Prosocial behavior occurred often (M = 22.8, SD = 4.2).
    • Volunteering activities (M = 3.2, SD = 1.2) and spending time with lonely friends (M = 3.4, SD = 1.0) reported less frequently.
    • Sharing with friends (M = 3.9, SD = 0.92), willingness to help (M = 4.1, SD = 0.8), trying to help others (M = 4.1, SD = 0.8), and empathy (M = 4.1, SD = 0.8) reported more frequently.
  • Regional variations: Southern Europe and Western Asia reported slightly higher; Eastern Europe and Eastern Asia lower.
  • Moderate association between prosocial behavior and well-being (r = 0.32).

Regression Analysis

  • Prosocial behavior explained significant variance in well-being: F(1,9483) = 1,096, p < 0.001, R^2 adjusted = 0.104.
    • Regression coefficient: B = 1.07, CI (1.01, 1.13); (\beta = 0.32), CI (0.30, 0.34), p < 0.001.
  • Prosocial behavior significantly positively predicted well-being in all regions.
  • Well-being showed strong positive correlation with psychological flexibility and positive affect.
  • Moderate to strong negative association with perceived stress.
  • Prosocial behavior showed moderate positive correlations with well-being, social support, and positive affect.
  • Weak positive was shown with psychological flexibility, and weak negative correlation with perceived stress.

Predictors

  • High perceived social support best explained prosocial behavior.
  • Higher levels of perceived stress and positive affect also contributed.
  • Female gender, being retired, and living with friends/roommates were positive predictors.
  • Psychological flexibility, being unemployed, living with parents, and living with roommates also significant.
  • Living with own family, being in a relationship, and being widowed were negative predictors.

Regional Variations

  • Strongest predictors of prosocial behavior were high levels of perceived social support in all regions.
  • Second strongest predictor was high level of perceived stress in most regions.
  • Positive affect was a strong predictor, followed by psychological flexibility was also positive across most regions.

Discussion

  • Prosocial behavior was frequently reported during lockdowns, supporting the idea that people support each other during social dilemmas.
  • Helping behavior might occur universally.
  • Lower levels in Eastern Europe and East Asia possibly due to cultural, historic, and political factors.
  • Spending time with lonely friends and volunteering occurred least frequently due to social restrictions.
  • Prosocial behavior consistently associated with well-being across regions.

Implications

  • Doing good to others feels good; emotional rewards are inherent.
  • The link is robust to emotional and social intricacies of a global crisis.
  • Female gender, being retired, being unemployed, and living with parents positively associated with prosocial behavior.
  • Having own family was negatively associated due to time constraints.
  • Prosocial behavior strongly associated with perceived social support.
  • Perceived social stress, positive affect, and psychological flexibility connected to elevated prosocial behavior.
  • Regional variations existed in the relationship of perceived stress.

Societal Impact

  • Prosocial behaviors drive meaningful change on a societal level.
  • Counteract adverse effects of the pandemic on mental health and well-being.
  • Prosocial behavior as a therapeutic target and for policy/intervention in disease containment.
  • Prosocial emotions can instigate behavior change.

Limitations

  • Cross-sectional study design, self-report measure, varying sample sizes per region.

Conclusion

  • Prosocial behavior consistently occurred across the world and was associated with better well-being during pandemic-induced lockdowns.
  • Future policy efforts should incorporate social networks and psychological competencies to facilitate prosocial behavior.