Federalism: Grants, Fiscal Trends, New Federalism, and Mandates

Creative/Centralized Federalism (1964-1980)

  • Definition: Federal government takes primary responsibility for initiatives at state/local levels, leading through federal priorities.
  • Mechanism: Grant-in-aid system.
    • Block Grants: More flexibility for states in spending.
    • Categorical Grants: More federal direction and restrictive spending requirements.
    • Federal government uses grants as leverage to influence state policies (e.g., requiring seat belt laws for highway grants, setting blood alcohol levels, Medicaid eligibility).

Fiscal Trends and State Reliance

  • Increased Federal Grants: Significant increase in federal grants to states from 19601960 to 20212021.
    • Major Drivers:
      • Medicaid program (enacted 19651965) is a primary driver of federal spending via grants.
      • COVID-1919 spending (20202020-20212021) caused massive spikes, dwarfing prior spending.
  • Grant Allocation: Most federal grant money to states goes towards healthcare.
  • State Reliance: States heavily rely on federal grant money, often making up 25%25\% or more of their annual budgets. This creates political incentives to accept federal stipulations rather than raise state taxes.

New Federalism (Reagan Era)

  • Period: Briefly, but importantly, involved returning power and authority to the states.
  • Concept: Devolution - the returning of power and authority to the states.
  • Reagan's Philosophy: Believed "government is the problem, not the solution" and advocated for smaller government with less involvement in state affairs.
  • Implementation: Attempted to cut back and reorient the grant-in-aid system.
    • Converted some block grants to categorical grants.
    • Eliminated general revenue sharing.
    • Reduced overall grant funding.
  • Executive Order 12612: Issued by Reagan, aimed to restore divisional governmental responsibilities between national and state governments, emphasizing limiting federal scope to matters beyond individual state competence.
  • Impact: States were unprepared for funding cuts, leading to friction and reductions in state-level programs. Federal grants dipped significantly from 19801980 to 19901990.

Federal Mandates

  • Definition: Direct federal government orders to states that do not come with additional funds for implementation, forcing states to comply and bear the costs.
  • Examples:
    • National Energy Policy Act (19921992): Required redesigned toilets with lower flushing capacity (e.g., 1.51.5 gallons instead of 3.53.5 gallons).
    • Safe Drinking Water Act (19861986): Mandated municipal water supplies meet federal cleanliness standards, requiring states to upgrade filtration systems if needed.
    • National Voter Registration Act (19931993) ("Motor Voter Act"): Required states to allow voter registration when accessing services like driver's licenses.
    • No Child Left Behind Act (20022002): Introduced federal education standards, inserting the federal government into local education policy.
  • Consequence: Federal mandates increase federal influence over state activities, often shifting implementation and financial burdens to states.