Chapter 8: Inventories – Measurement
Inventory Overview
Inventory represents assets a company:
Intends to sell in the normal course of business
Is in production for future sale (work in process, WIP)
Is currently used in production of goods to be sold (raw materials)
Cost of goods sold (COGS) is an expense on the income statement that represents the cost of the inventory sold during the year.
Types of Inventory
Merchandising inventory
Goods purchased primarily in finished form from wholesalers/retailers
Cost includes: purchase price plus any other costs necessary to get goods in condition and location for sale
Manufacturing inventory
Consists of: raw materials, work-in-process (WIP), finished goods
Raw materials: cost of materials to be used in production
WIP: costs of components that have started production but are not yet complete
Finished goods: goods completed in production but not yet sold
Cost components in manufacturing: direct materials, direct labor, manufacturing overhead
Inventory for a Manufacturer (Component Costs)
Raw materials: materials purchased that will be used in production
Direct labor: labor directly traceable to production
Manufacturing overhead: indirect costs allocated to production
Work in process (WIP): costs of partially completed goods
Finished goods: completed goods awaiting sale
Flow: Raw materials purchased → Direct labor and overhead applied → Work in Process transferred to Finished Goods → Finished Goods sold -> Cost of Goods Sold is applied when goods are sold
Inventory Disclosure (Examples: Intel and Best Buy)
Manufacturing companies disclose dollar amount of each inventory category (in notes or balance sheet)
Merchandising companies typically disclose a single inventory category
Intel (example, $ in millions):
Raw materials: $1,517
Work in process: $7,565
Finished goods: $4,142
Merchandise inventory: —
Total inventories: $13,224
Best Buy (example, $ in millions):
Raw materials: —
Work in process: —
Finished goods: —
Merchandise inventory: $5,140
Total inventories: $5,140
Inventory Components and Cost Flow (Manufacturing Company)
Raw materials purchased
Raw materials used
Direct labor incurred
Manufacturing overhead incurred
Work in process transferred to finished goods
Finished goods sold
Direct labor applied
Manufacturing overhead applied
Cost of Goods Sold (COGS)
Inventory Systems
Perpetual Inventory System
Continuously adjust the inventory account for purchases, sales, and returns
Continuously adjust COGS for goods sold or returned by customers
Provides up-to-date view of goods on hand on any date
Perpetual Inventory System (illustrative example: Lothridge Wholesale Beverage)
Beginning inventory: $120,000 on hand
Purchases on account: $600,000
Sales for the year: $820,000
COGS for inventory sold: $540,000
Ending inventory: $180,000
Journal entries illustrate recording purchases, sales, and COGS under a perpetual system
Periodic Inventory System
Adjusts inventory and records COGS only at end of period
Merchandises purchases, returns, discounts, and freight-in are recorded in temporary accounts
COGS for the period: Beginning inventory + Net purchases - Ending inventory
For Lothridge example under periodic system:
Beginning inventory: $120,000
Purchases: $600,000
Ending inventory (physical count): $180,000
COGS: $540,000
Net purchases = Beginning inventory + Purchases - Ending inventory; COGS computed at period end
Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) and Periodic vs Perpetual
COGS formula (Periodic):
Ending inventory and COGS are determined at period-end physical count or adjustment
Perpetual system provides more timely information; periodic system reduces ongoing recordkeeping but requires physical counts
Comparison: Perpetual vs Periodic (LO8-1)
Perpetual: limited recordkeeping during period; higher ongoing costs but more timely data
Periodic: higher recordkeeping complexity during period; requires physical count for end-of-period values
Financial statement effects: generally not significant; timing and accuracy differ
Physical Units Included in Inventory (LO8-2)
Items in possession of the company
Goods in transit
Goods on consignment
Anticipated sales returns
Goods in Transit (LO8-2)
Inventory items being shipped from seller to buyer
Ownership at year-end determines which entity reports the inventory in its balance sheet
Shipping terms (e.g., FOB shipping point vs FOB destination) determine who bears risk and title during transit
Goods in Transit (continued): FOB Terms (LO8-2)
If shipped FOB shipping point, title transfers to the buyer at shipment; buyer records inventory earlier; seller may have no entry at shipment date
If shipped FOB destination, title transfers to the buyer only upon arrival; seller retains ownership until delivery
Goods in Transit (Illustration: Lothridge example) (LO8-2)
Sale on Dec 29, 2027; goods arrive Jan 3, 2028
Depending on terms (FOB shipping point vs destination), balance sheet reporting may differ for year-end
Goods on Consignment (LO8-2)
Transferor (consignor) retains legal title until sold by consignee
Consignee (buyer) holds physical possession and is responsible for selling
Inventory remains on consignor’s books until sale occurs; sale is recorded by consignor when title passes to third party
Example: Premier Clothing (consignor) ships inventory to Regal Outlets (consignee) with a 10% commission; any unsold items after six months are returned to consignor
Sales Returns (LO8-2)
When customers return merchandise:
1) Debit Sales Returns; credit Refund Liability
2) Reduce COGS
3) Increase InventoryAt period-end, estimate future returns and adjust ending inventory accordingly to include costs of inventory expected to be returned
Net Purchases and Inventory Costs (LO8-3)
Inventory costs include expenditures to acquire inventory and bring it to desired condition and location for sale or use in manufacturing
Product costs include:
Purchase price
Freight-in (incoming) borne by buyer
Insurance during transit (if shipped f.o.b. shipping point)
Costs of unloading, unpacking, preparing inventory for sale, or raw materials for use
Freight-in on Purchases
In perpetual system: freight-in is added to the inventory account
In periodic system: freight-in is added to a temporary account (freight-in or transportation-in) and included in net purchases for COGS calculation
Freight-out (outgoing shipping) is not included in inventory cost; charged to COGS or operating expense
Purchase Returns
A buyer views a purchase return as a reduction of purchases
Perpetual system: return reduces inventory
Periodic system: use Purchase Returns to accumulate returns and subtract from total purchases to compute net purchases
Purchase Discounts (LO8-3)
Represents reductions if payment is made within a designated period (e.g., 2/10, n/30)
Recorded by either gross method ornet method
Gross method example: purchase for $20,000 with terms 2/10, n/30; if paid within discount period, cash and accounts payable are reduced by the discounted amount; inventory unaffected under gross method at purchase date
Net method example: record payable net of discount; cash paid equals discounted amount; inventory recorded at discounted price
Lothridge example illustrates both methods and the effect on entries
Inventory Transactions — Perpetual and Periodic Systems (LO8-3)
Provided example shows: purchases, freight-in, returns, discounts, cash payments, sales, and COGS under both systems
End-of-period adjustments differ depending on the chosen system
Illustration—Inventory Cost Flow (LO8-4): Converse Company
Beginning inventory and purchases during the year:
Beg. Inv: 4,000 units @ $5.50 = $22,000
Jan 17 purchase: 1,000 @ $6.00 = $6,000
Mar 22 purchase: 3,000 @ $7.00 = $21,000
Oct 15 purchase: 3,000 @ $7.50 = $22,500
Goods available for sale: 11,000 units, total cost $71,500
Sales: 6,500 units
Question: What is the cost of the 6,500 units sold? (LO8-4)
Using weighted-average cost (Periodic):
Weighted-average unit cost =
COGS for 6,500 units =
Ending inventory (4,500 units) =
Allocation of Units Available for Sale (LO8-4)
Beginning inventory: 4,000 units @ cost; Purchases: 7,000 units total
Ending inventory: 4,500 units; Units sold: 6,500
Goods available for sale: 11,000 units
Ending inventory + COGS must equal cost of goods available for sale ($71,500)
Specific Identification Method (LO8-4)
Tracks actual units sold
Used for unique, expensive items with low volume (e.g., automobiles with serial numbers)
Each item’s actual cost is matched to its sale
Cost Flow Assumptions (LO8-4)
Average cost: cost of inventory is a weighted average of all goods available for sale
FIFO (First-In, First-Out): units acquired first are sold first; ending inventory consists of most recently acquired units
LIFO (Last-In, First-Out): units acquired last are sold first; ending inventory consists of oldest units
Periodic Average Cost (LO8-4)
Beginning inventory balance: 4,000 units @ $5.50
Additions: purchases at various costs
Cost of goods available for sale: 11,000 units; Weighted-average cost per unit =
COGS (6,500 units) =
Ending inventory (4,500 units) =
Note: The weighted-average cost is calculated at the end of the period in periodic systems
Perpetual Average Cost (LO8-4)
Moving-average cost is updated after each purchase
New average = (cost of existing inventory balance + cost of new purchase) / (units on hand after purchase)
Example shows sequential updates of average cost after each transaction
Resulting COGS and ending inventory reflect moving-average costs
FIFO — Periodic (LO8-4)
Under periodic FIFO, oldest units are sold first, regardless of timing of purchases within the period
Ending inventory consists of the most recently acquired units
Example results: COGS and ending inventory differ from other methods (FIFO vs average vs LIFO) depending on cost changes during the period
LIFO — Periodic (LO8-4)
Under periodic LIFO, last units purchased are assumed sold first; ending inventory consists of oldest units
Example results illustrate higher COGS and lower ending inventory for rising costs
Comparison of Cost Flow Methods (LO8-4)
Periodic methods: Average, FIFO, LIFO
Example comparison (goods available for sale $71,500):
Average: COGS = $42,250; Ending inventory = $29,250
FIFO: COGS = $38,500; Ending inventory = $33,000
LIFO: COGS = $46,500; Ending inventory = $25,000
The choice of method affects COGS and ending inventory values
The overall goods available for sale remains the same across methods
Inventory Cost Flow Under GAAP vs IFRS (LO8-9)
GAAP: LIFO is permissible in the U.S. for financial reporting
IFRS: LIFO is generally not permitted; FIFO and other methods are common
Some firms disclose a mix of methods, and note differences in inventories between GAAP and IFRS (e.g., General Mills example comparing inventories under LIFO vs FIFO/NRV)
Factors Influencing Method Choice (LO8-5)
Choices reflect a combination of objectives and incentives:
Inventory cost flow method
Depreciation method
Pension assumptions
Other strategic choices to meet objectives
Managers may pursue methods that maximize personal or organizational benefits
Practical Considerations: Method Choice and Physical Flow (LO8-5)
FIFO is often suited to situations where oldest goods are sold first (physical flow)
Average cost can approximate actual flow for inventories with a mix of items purchased at different times
LIFO is less commonly used because of recordkeeping and potential liquidation risks
Tax and Reporting Considerations (LO8-5)
Rising costs: LIFO often yields lower reported profits for tax purposes (tax advantages)
IRS LIFO conformity rule: If LIFO is used to measure taxable income, it must also be used for external financial reporting
LIFO Reserves (LO8-6)
LIFO Reserves = Inventory balance under LIFO (external reporting) minus Inventory balance under FIFO or average (internal records)
LIFO reserve is reported as a contra account to adjust the internal method to the external LIFO method for reporting
Reasons to avoid maintaining LIFO internal records:
1) High recordkeeping costs
2) Bonus/profit-sharing plans tied to non-LIFO measures
3) Using FIFO/average for pricing decisions
4) Maximizing tax deductions
LIFO Reserves: Illustrative Adjusting Entries (LO8-6)
Doubletree Corporation example (internal FIFO, external LIFO):
2027 (first year): LIFO ending inventory = $110,000; FIFO ending = $120,000; LIFO reserve = $10,000
End-of-year adjusting entry (to convert to LIFO):
Debit Cost of Goods Sold $10,000; Credit LIFO Reserve $10,000
2028: LIFO reserve increases to $30,000 (FIFO $160,000 vs LIFO $130,000)
Debit Cost of Goods Sold $20,000; Credit LIFO Reserve $20,000
2029: LIFO reserve decreases to $25,000 (FIFO $175,000 vs LIFO $150,000)
Debit LIFO Reserve $5,000; Credit Cost of Goods Sold $5,000
Result on financial statements: LIFO reserve adjustments affect reported COGS and ending inventory
LIFO Reserve Disclosure (Caterpillar, Inc.)
Inventory reported at FIFO (internal) less the LIFO reserve to arrive at LIFO amount on the balance sheet
Inventories and LIFO reserve (illustrative figures in dollars, e.g., 2022 and 2021):
Inventories at FIFO: $19,591 (2022) / $16,637 (2021)
Less: LIFO reserve: $(3,321)$ (2022) / $(2,599)$ (2021)
Inventories at LIFO: $16,270$ (2022) / $14,038$ (2021)
LIFO Liquidations (LO8-6, LO8-5)
LIFO liquidation: when the number of units sold exceeds the number purchased in a period, causing old layers to be liquidated
Consequence: old, lower-cost layers may be matched with current selling prices, affecting net income depending on cost changes
Example (National Distributors):
Beginning inventory: 20,000 units @ $16
Purchases: 30,000 units @ $20
Goods available for sale: 50,000 units
Sold: 45,000 units
If no liquidation, COGS would be 45,000 × $20 = $900,000
LIFO liquidation effect (before tax) reduces COGS to $840,000, increasing gross profit by $60,000
Decision Makers’ Perspective—Inventory Management (LO8-7)
Objectives: maintain sufficient inventories to sustain operations while minimizing ordering and carrying costs
Conflicts: too much inventory raises costs; too little inventory can cause stockouts
Tools to balance: computerized inventory control systems, outsourcing, Just-in-Time (JIT)
Just-in-Time (JIT) System (LO8-7)
Raw materials and components arrive when needed to meet exact demand, minimizing high inventory balances
Example: Harley-Davidson uses JIT to coordinate production and minimize inventory while meeting custom-order demands
Key Ratios Used to Monitor Inventories (LO8-7)
Gross profit ratio (gross margin):
Gross profit = Net sales − COGS
Inventory turnover ratio: measures how many times inventory is sold during a period
Higher ratios indicate more efficient inventory management; declining ratios may signal obsolescence or weak marketing/sales
Methods of Simplifying LIFO (LO8-8)
Limitations of LIFO: high recordkeeping costs when many distinct units or frequent cost changes
Techniques to simplify LIFO:
LIFO inventory pools
Dollar-value LIFO (DVL) method
LIFO Inventory Pools (LO8-8)
Group inventory units into pools based on physical similarities
Within pools, purchases are treated as if made at the same time and cost; unit costs within the pool are averaged
If ending inventory in a pool increases, ending inventory and beginning inventory adjust with a single layer added at the pool’s average cost
LIFO Inventory Pools: Diamond Lumber (LO8-8 to LO8-8)
Beginning inventory pool: Pine, Oak, Maple with quantities and costs
Beginning average cost for the pool = total cost / total units
Example result: average cost per board foot = $2.54; ending inventory computed by pool cost and ending quantity
Dollar-Value LIFO (DVL) (LO8-8)
Pools are defined by dollar value, not by physical units
Cost indexes track changes in inventory values over time
Cost flow is analyzed by layers created in different years
DVL Components and Process (LO8-8)
Cost indexes adjust ending inventory layers to current year costs
Steps:
1) Convert ending inventory to base-year costs
2) Identify layers of ending inventory created each year
3) Restate each layer using the cost index in the year acquired
The DVL Inventory Estimation Technique (LO8-8)
Step 1: Ending inventory in base-year costs
Example: ending inventory base-year cost = $462,000; base-year cost index 1.05; ending inventory at DVL cost ≈ $462,000 ÷ 1.05 = $440,000
Step 2: Identify layers created each year (e.g., beginning layer, new layers from increases in quantity)
Step 3: Restate each layer using the year-specific cost index to produce ending inventory at DVL cost
Example result: layers restated to produce ending inventory at DVL cost; cumulative adjustments shown
LIFO Matters: Advantages of DVL and LIFO Pools
Dollar-value LIFO advantages:
Simplifies recordkeeping
Minimizes liquidation risk of LIFO layers
Replacements of old items are viewed as maintaining the dollar value of inventory
End of Chapter 8
Inventory measurement, cost flow assumptions, and reporting affect financial statements and tax considerations
The choice of method interacts with practical flow, reporting needs, and strategic objectives