Takeover Defenses and Fiduciary Duties
Takeover Defenses Terminology
- Crown Jewel:
- When a company is threatened with a takeover, management may try to make the company less attractive to the raider.
- This is done by selling the company's most valuable asset (the "crown jewel") to a third party.
- Golden Parachute:
- When a takeover is successful, top management is usually changed.
- To prepare for this, a company may establish special termination or retirement benefits that must be paid to top managers if they are "retired."
- A departing high-level manager's parachute will be "golden" when they are forced to "bail out" of the company.
- Greenmail:
- To regain control, a target company may pay a higher-than-market price to repurchase all of the stock that the acquiring corporation bought.
- When a takeover is attempted through a gradual accumulation of target stock rather than a tender offer, the intent may be to induce the target company to buy back the shares at a premium price.
- This concept is similar to blackmail.
- Pac-Man:
- Named after the Atari video game.
- This is an aggressive defense in which the target corporation attempts its own takeover of the acquiring corporation.
- Poison Pill:
- The target corporation issues to its stockholders rights to purchase additional shares at low prices when there is a takeover attempt.
- This makes the takeover undesirably or even prohibitively expensive for the acquiring corporation.
- White Knight:
- The target corporation solicits a merger with a third party.
- The third party then makes a better (often simply a higher) tender offer to the target's shareholders.
- The third party that "rescues" the target is the "white knight."
Fiduciary Duties and Entrenched Management
- The board of directors has a fiduciary duty to the corporation and its shareholders to act in the best interests of the company.
- In a hostile takeover attempt, directors’ duties of loyalty may collide with self-interest (i.e., the desire to keep their jobs).
Heightened Standards of Review
- Courts have articulated different heightened standards of review in specific change-of-control scenarios.
- Unocal Review:
- Courts apply the Unocal Test to analyze defensive measures taken by directors in response to a hostile takeover.
- Revlon Review:
- Courts apply the Revlon Test when the sale of a company is inevitable.
Asset Stripping
- Asset-Stripping:
- The process of buying an undervalued company with the intent of selling off its assets to generate profit for shareholders.
- While proceeds from asset stripping may be used to pay down debt, proceeds are often used to pay a dividend to shareholders.
Impact on Other Corporate Stakeholders
- Creditors:
- Asset stripping weakens the company, which has less collateral for borrowing.
- The company may have its value-producing assets stripped out, leaving it less able to support debt on the books.
- Employees:
- Asset stripping can result in a significant loss of jobs, especially if the sale of assets involves moving subsidiaries to new locations.
Fiduciary Duty: To Whom?
- Does harm to creditors, employers, or other corporate stakeholders matter?
- Should a corporation not take actions that harm other corporate stakeholders unless the benefit to shareholders exceeds such harm?
- Do we need to redefine fiduciary duties more broadly to include other corporate stakeholders?
- Or should we put the onus on the legislature to enact laws to protect these stakeholders against business entities that ruthlessly act to maximize shareholder value?