cost benefit analysis
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Introduction
- Presenter: Lorenzo Villa Zapata, PhD
- Course: PHRM6750_Pharm and US Health Care System Spring 2026
Definition and Purpose of Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA)
- Monetary Representation: Both outcomes and costs are converted to monetary units (dollars) in cost-benefit analysis.
- Comparative Aspect: CBA enables the comparison of different types of interventions or entirely different businesses.
- Challenges: Assigning reasonable costs or benefits in monetary terms can be troubling for some individuals.
- Objective: CBA is utilized to determine whether the value of the outcome of an intervention or service outweighs the cost of performing that intervention or service.
- Valuation: All values are quantified in monetary terms, essential for resource allocation from a budget to services or activities that can generate revenue or enhance a budgetary bottom line.
Historical Context
- First Use: The first documented use of CBA in healthcare was to quantify the value of a vaccination program aimed at children in the 1960s.
Benefits of Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Comparison of Programs: CBA allows for the comparison of multiple types of programs with differing outcomes, such as after-school activity programs versus smoking cessation programs or vaccination programs.
- Decision-Making Flexibility: CBA provides a unique aspect in decision-making where the option to do nothing exists, unlike cost-minimization or cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA), where treatment options are presented to a patient requiring intervention.
Calculation in Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Net Benefit: The net benefit is calculated as the difference between total benefits and total costs, derived from subtracting total costs from total benefits.
- If Net Benefit > 0: The project is regarded as cost-beneficial. - Benefit-to-Cost Ratio: Calculated by dividing the total of all benefits by the total of all costs associated with the project.
- If Benefit-to-Cost Ratio > 1: The project is also considered cost-beneficial.
Comparative Examples
- Type of Programs Compared in CBA:
- Vaccination program
- Cost-effectiveness ratio: $100,000 per case prevented
- Benefit-cost ratio: 2.4:1
- Nutrition education program
- Cost-effectiveness ratio: $30,000 per obese child avoided
- Benefit-cost ratio: 0.5:1
References and Acknowledgment
- Received: 16 April 2020
- Revised: 30 April 2020
- Accepted: 14 May 2020
- DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.13195
- Original Article: Benefit of Incorporating Clinical Pharmacists in an Adult Intensive Care Unit: A Cost-saving Study
- Authors: Daniel Muñoz-Pichuante PharmD, BCCCP & Lorenzo Villa-Zapata PharmD, PhD